Post Funny Videos

[Blackleaf]

Trump knows more about everything than anyone! It's a good thing he's modest!




[Spoiler]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEcNMir6aSs[/spoiler]



19 things Donald Trump knows better than anyone else, according to Donald Trump

"Let me tell you, I am so modest. There is no one more modest than me. People always tell me, Mr. Trump, you are so modest. I wish I was as modest as you. I think I'm almost as modest as I love the Mexicans."

[Blackleaf]

Virtue signaling by the genius minions of Clinton Inc?

*Anyone says anything negative about Trump*

Baruch: "But Clinton and Obama."

[Baruch]

*Anyone says anything negative about Trump*

Baruch: "But Clinton and Obama."

You can be negative on Trump all you want.  What I "get off on" is the intensity of the TDS.  It is like y'all can't orgasm without politics being involved.  Y'all's outrage is vicarious Viagra for me ;-))

[Unbeliever]

Stupid people doing stupid stuff:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt3aLev041E

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Well, half the population is below average intelligence, 

That's not how that works.

[Blackleaf]

That's not how that works.

Well, if intelligence follows the standard bell curve, it would be true. The bell could be skewed, however. I haven't seen a recent study on that, but I think I remember hearing that most people have an IQ above 100, though.

[Plu]

IQ is a forced bell-curve based on how it works, but it's global so it's possible for people within a country to not fall on the curve, or even be above average. Or below.

Actually intelligence on the other hand... it's tricky.

[Baruch]

Well, if intelligence follows the standard bell curve, it would be true. The bell could be skewed, however. I haven't seen a recent study on that, but I think I remember hearing that most people have an IQ above 100, though.

Technically, a Poisson curve ... since it starts at zero and goes up from there.  A Gaussian is centered at zero, and trails negative and positive.  When you aren't too far from the mean (average) which should be at the peak of the curve, it doesn't matter too much.  It only matters at the far ends.  Back in the day, with people using tables to do functions, it was easier working with the Gaussian than the Poisson.  Today with calculators, not so much.  And yes, 100 isn't the true average.  It actually varies below and above that.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Well, if intelligence follows the standard bell curve, it would be true. The bell could be skewed, however. I haven't seen a recent study on that, but I think I remember hearing that most people have an IQ above 100, though.

The curve is created by the people, the people don't serve the curve. Most people have an IQ around 100. I can't understand why some think only one person can have a point on the curve, a curve that is wholly artificial.

[Baruch]

The curve is created by the people, the people don't serve the curve. Most people have an IQ around 100. I can't understand why some think only one person can have a point on the curve, a curve that is wholly artificial.

So you agree that over quantifying things is wrong?  I agree.  It was invented in the US to aid the draft in 1917.  And also used by educators to rate preschoolers.  This technique proved, proved ... that I was a way cool brat at 6 years old, way cool!  So it must be accurate ;-))

[Unbeliever]

Hell, Baruch, you were probably cool before it was cool to be cool! LOL

[Baruch]

Hell, Baruch, you were probably cool before it was cool to be cool! LOL

Nah, that was Chilly Willy (early cartoon character).

[Unbeliever]

You mean this one?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inIABmgkcU4

[Munch]

thats so saccharine I think it just gave me double diabetes.

[Unbeliever]

Well, isn't that sweet!


LOL