intro

[EnvireMental]

they are the very very filtration of what you wanna learn. and sure that u got the point.

like you said: rhetoric is bullshit.

because in rhetoric,  sometimes 2+2 not=4, we can't trust it.

[Nam]

they are the very very filtration of what you wanna learn. and sure that u got the point.

like you said: rhetoric is bullshit.

because in rhetoric,  sometimes 2+2 not=4, we can't trust it.

Brain filled with nonsense.

-Nam

[EnvireMental]

Brain filled with nonsense.

-Nam

do you have anything worth to say? except ad hominem

[Nam]

do you have anything worth to say? except ad hominem

Yeah, you thinking i'm attempting to get a reaction out of you. All I want from you is to speak coherently. You barely do that.

-Nam

[EnvireMental]

Yeah, you thinking i'm attempting to get a reaction out of you. All I want from you is to speak coherently. You barely do that.

-Nam

haha you read my mind. i really exactly thinking about that.

you have jinn or something, you can know what i am thinking. ? or i guess u r a teenager

[Nam]

haha you read my mind. i really exactly thinking about that.

The fact that what I type is incoherent to you speaks volumes to me.

you have jinn or something, you can know what i am thinking. ? or i guess u r a teenager

And, if I were it'd be bad for you since I have a better grasp of English than you.

-Nam

[EnvireMental]

so it means from the first what you write to me is planned to provoke me? right? do u confess?

on a purpose writing incoherent.

[Sargon The Grape]

EnvireMental, write proper English or quit fucking talking.

[Nam]

so it means from the first what you write to me is planned to provoke me? right? do u confess?

No. However, it does seem you wish to provoke me by your incessant repetitious questioning of me about it.

All I want is for you to speak coherently; that's it.

on a purpose writing incoherent.

I am writing coherently, it is you who is writing incoherently.

-Nam

[frosty]

You are confusing the words 'complain' and 'criticiize"
Pointing out and criticising a double standard is not complaining about it.
Your agro/emo problem isn't my problem. And atheist antipathy doesnt change my heart rate one iota.

Yet it certainly seems to raise your ire and get you going. You whine that you get mistreated, you lash out in emotional responses back, I think you're lying to yourself. The antipathy indeed bothers you, that's why you reply back with such snide and conviction. If it's any consolation I can truly say theist antipathy doesn't bother me either; it once did, but that's before I realized how self-assured and abusive irrational people can be regarding the subject of faith.

Yes, I guess that DOES come across as a little bit arrogant doesnt it.

You knew exactly what I meant. I do not accept people bashing one set of mythological beliefs while holding their own and arrogantly proclaiming that their side is correct, abusing the other mythological side in the process. This is not the year 435 AD, if you make a claim you are expected to back it up, not just beat your chest and say "OMG GUYZ MY FAITH IS RIGHTER THAN YOURS!!!". That will get you rightly mocked, criticized and attacked. You know exactly what I mean by this, don't play dumb.

I'm ALWAYS emotional. Robots don't have souls or emotions. I do.
Materialists are the ones who need to account for their "programming"

Citation please (sound familiar?). If you are ALWAYS emotional then you actually have a lot of problems. Humans are supposed to be a balance between emotional and rational, neither one or the other in constant is necessarily healthy. It seems like you just conceded that you are always emotional hence you use emotions in your argument, which in the real world would get you laughed at. "Materialists" try to account for their programming with some type of evidence, you do not, you simply say you have a "soul" with no proof then lash out at everyone else that doesn't agree with you. You need to do some self reflecting about how you talk to other people, it's obviously not working for you.

So I'm not allowed to be 'sassy' but you are?

How about a bit of post-modern humanism and an agreement that we are BOTH humans with different world views and that this forum is a good venue for equality of free speech and contest of ideas????

That is utterly laughable that you cling to ancient beliefs and yet you pull out the "let's all get along and respect each other" card when your back is against the wall. You go after other people, they go after you back, then you bitch constantly about how you are being picked on and nobody is being fair. I got a little hint for you: Treating others with respect, and providing some evidence for your erroneous claims, is a start. That's a good start to truly acting on what I'm quoting you said. But I assume that you'll just argue back, being a snide little shithead, provide no proof for your claims, and forever argue in circles until you leave the forum.

I guess if I was so spiteful and angry like you I would post an emoticon here to counter his one, but I'm not 4 years old anymore.

[Nam]

^CE and BCE.

;-)

-Nam

[Lion IRC]

Introduction threads are pointless anyway....

Then why are you posting in this one?

[Lion IRC]

Not tribulation, distress, persecution, famine, or nakedness, peril, sword...neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature,

Yes, I guess that DOES come across as a little bit arrogant doesnt it.


I'm ALWAYS emotional. Robots don't have souls or emotions. I do.
Materialists are the ones who need to account for their "programming"

Citation please (sound familiar?).

Which part did you need the citation for?
The bit about robots not having emotion?

[stromboli]

Citation because you'll be kicked off the forum for not doing so. Its a legal thing.

[Lion IRC]

You seem to know.
Which part of my post needs the citation?