Whistleblower Leaks Trove of Documents on Drones & Obama's Assassination Program

[drunkenshoe]

A New Snowden? Whistleblower Leaks Trove of Documents on Drones & Obama's Assassination Program

http://www.democracynow.org/2015/10/15/a_new_snowden_whistleblower_leaks_trove

The link: https://theintercept.com/drone-papers

Newly leaked government documents have provided an unprecedented window into the secret U.S. drone assassination program across the globe. In "The Drone Papers," The Intercept reveals drone strikes have resulted from unreliable intelligence, stemming in large part from electronic communications data, or "signals intelligence," that officials acknowledge is insufficient. The documents also undermine government claims that the drone strikes have been precise. In Afghanistan, strikes on 35 direct targets killed at least 219 other people. Among other revelations, they also suggest the strikes have hurt intelligence gathering and that unknown male victims have been labeled as "enemies killed in action" unless evidence later proves otherwise. The documents were leaked to The Intercept by an unnamed U.S. intelligence source.

TRANSCRIPT
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: Newly leaked government documents have provided an unprecedented window into the secret U.S. drone assassination program across the globe. In "The Drone Papers," the website The Intercept reveals drone strikes have resulted from unreliable intelligence, stemming in large part from electronic communications data, or "signals intelligence," that officials acknowledge is insufficient. The documents also undermine government claims that the drone strikes have been precise. In Afghanistan, strikes on 35 direct targets killed at least 219 other people.

This is Jeremy Scahill of The Intercept, which just published an eight-part series on the leaked documents.

JEREMY SCAHILL: But the fact that this is the first time that primary source documents have been published that detail the chain of command for assassinating people around the globe. The banality of the bureaucracy of assassination is so clear in these documentsâ€"the cold corporate words that they use to describe killing people. The "basics of manhunting" is one of the terms that they use. The "tyranny of distance" is another term that they use. "Arab features," you know, to describe people that they’re looking at from thousands of feet above. The corporate coldness of the way that these documents reflect what is actually a process of systematically hunting down and assassinating human beings should send chills through the spine of people who care about democracy in this society.

AMY GOODMAN: That’s The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill. The documents were leaked to The Intercept by an unnamed U.S. intelligence source. The source told The Intercept, quote, "It's stunning the number of instances when I’ve come across intelligence that was faulty, when sources of information used to finish targets were misattributed to people. And it isn’t until several months or years later that you realize that the entire time you thought you were going after this target, it was his mother’s phone the whole time. Anyone caught in the vicinity is guilty by associationâ€"it’s a phenomenal gamble," the source said. We will link to The Intercept’s exposé on "The Drone Papers" on our website.

[drunkenshoe]

Did we chuck this into the fantasy bin?

[AllPurposeAtheist]

It's ugly no doubt about that. Conversely suppose that instead of targeting individuals they instead used B-52's and high explosives to carpet bomb the entire area?  Or they could not do it at all.  I know I don't feel one iota safer with it.

[mauricio]

Did they write stupid jokes on their strategic documents?

[Jason Harvestdancer]

This has got to be awkward for Obama supporters.

[drunkenshoe]

Well, if there is really a whistleblower, it would probably continue I guess. We'll see. Also it is the end of Obama's period. Timing is important.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/16/drone-documents-whistleblower-edward-snowden-daniel-ellsberg

Classified documents on US assassination program released to the Intercept welcomed by men who exposed NSA surveillance and Pentagon Papers

American whistleblowers hailed the release on Thursday of a collection of classified documents about US drone warfare as a blow on behalf of transparency and human rights.

The documents anchored a multi-part report by the Intercept on the Defense Department assassination program in Yemen and Somalia. Amnesty International, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other rights groups said the report raised significant concerns about human rights violations by the US government, and called for an investigation.

Classified documents published by the Intercept include pages from a 2013 study of the drone program by a Pentagon taskforce. The documents came from “a source within the intelligence community who worked on the types of operations and programs described in the slides”, the Intercept said.

“It’s pretty remarkable stuff,” said Micah Zenko, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

“In some ways it reconfirms and illuminates much of what we knew, or thought we knew, about a lot of these programs, like that the administration firmly prefers kill over capture despite claiming the opposite, and that there’s not ‘a bunch of folks in the room’, as Obama calls it â€" that there’s a clear, bureaucratic process for this.

“It clearly shows, as we’ve known, that the United States does not know who it’s killing.”

The White House and National Security Council declined to comment on the leak.

“The report the Intercept story references is an internal classified document,” said Pentagon spokeswoman Linda Rojas. “As a matter of policy we don’t comment on the details of classified reports.”

The CIA maintains a drone assassination program separate from the Pentagon program, although Barack Obama has called for bringing the CIA program inside the Defense Department. That effort has stalled.

The Intercept report revealed, among other new disclosures, that at one point in 2012 Obama had approved 20 people for assassination in Yemen and Somalia. More than 200 were killed by drones in those countries that year, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

It revealed that the military labels unidentified people it kills in targeted strikes as “enemies killed in action”, although victims may be family members or associates of actual targets â€" or may just have been nearby, or mistakenly targeted.

Edward Snowden, the former government contractor who in 2013 leaked classified documents about surveillance programs to journalist Glenn Greenwald â€" then at the Guardian, now at the Intercept â€" hailed the new leak on Twitter.

“In an astonishing act of civil courage, one American just shattered an unspeakable lie,” Snowden wrote. “When we look back on today, we will find the most important national security story of the year. Today, @DanielEllsberg is smiling.”

Ellsberg, who in 1971 leaked the Pentagon Papers secret history of the Vietnam war, confirmed in an interview with the Guardian that he was smiling.

Advertisement

“He’s right about that,” Ellsberg said.

Ellsberg said the source behind the Intercept reports was part of a chain of recent whistleblowers going back to Chelsea Manning, the US army soldier who passed classified documents to WikiLeaks and was convicted of violating the Espionage Act.

“It’s wonderful,” Ellsberg said. “I waited 40 years to see somebody, for Chelsea Manning, to put out a comprehensive, sufficiently voluminous number of long-held secrets, enough to make the case clear.

“I waited 40 years for Chelsea. Three more for Snowden. And so it’s wonderful that somebody is telling the truth about this series of crimes. I’m very glad to see it.”

In a Democracy Now interview Jeremy Scahill, the lead author of the Intercept reports, called the source an “extremely principled and brave whistleblower”.

Zenko said the locus of the source was “hard to know”, because “there’s just such a crossover between the intelligence community and the military anyway”.

“As we know, to keep one Predator [unmanned aerial vehicle] aloft, you need like 130 people, and most of them are just looking at video screens and doing analysis of the collection that that drone does,” Zenko said. “There’s so many people running these programs.”

Ellsberg said of the source: “I hope they stay anonymous. Nothing at all would be gained by their suffering the fate of exile like Snowden [who now lives in Russia], or isolation or imprisonment like Chelsea [who was given a 35-year jail term]. Or the life sentences that I faced, or that others have faced.

“It comes down to this. Hundreds could have done what I did, literally. And should have. Hundreds of people could and should have done what Edward Snowden did. And hundreds of people could and should have done what Chelsea Manning did.

“They did the right thing. The others were wrong to keep those secrets.”

[drunkenshoe]

White House response:

Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen who is a Senior Operational Leader of Al Qa’ida or An Associated Force

http://tr.scribd.com/doc/123883608/Lawfulness-of-a-Lethal-Operation-Directed-Against-a-U-S-Citizen-who-is-a-Senior-Operational-Leader-of-Al-Qa-ida-or-An-Associated-Force

[Unbeliever]

If the U.S. government can kill anyone in the world, it can kill you or your loved ones! The same applies to torture - if they can do it, they will do it.

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Oh, but Obama is so wonderful, probably the best president ever, that he'd never abuse a program like this.  If you don't agree it is because you are racist.