News:

Welcome to our site!

Main Menu

Atheism and Morality from Conservapedia

Started by Mermaid, April 04, 2015, 01:13:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1 2 3
User actions

Mermaid

April 04, 2015, 01:13:04 PM
This seems to be every myth, lie and misconception about atheists on one neat web page.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_Morality

A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticise work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life’s realities â€" all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority but of weakness. -TR

stromboli

#1
April 04, 2015, 01:22:26 PM
"Moral depravity as a causal factor for atheism......"  :eek:

Wow, what a find. There is enough misinformation in one place to write a dozen sermons on. I could actually feel my brain shrinking while reading that.

Mermaid

#2
April 04, 2015, 01:31:18 PM
I learned a few things. Atheists don't have an adequate explanation for what love is.

WHO KNEW!?
A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticise work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life’s realities â€" all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority but of weakness. -TR

kilodelta

#3
April 04, 2015, 01:54:59 PM
Quote from: Mermaid on April 04, 2015, 01:31:18 PM
I learned a few things. Atheists don't have an adequate explanation for what love is.

WHO KNEW!?

But, we can better define hate than Christians...
Faith: pretending to know things you don't know

SGOS

#4
April 04, 2015, 02:02:22 PM Last Edit: April 04, 2015, 02:04:30 PM by SGOS
Conservapedia sounds like a combination of "conservative" and "Wikipedia."  Is it like Wikipedia for right wingers?  Is it affiliated with the real Wikipedia?

Edit:  More importantly, is its purpose to dispense information,    or propaganda?

Mermaid

#5
April 04, 2015, 02:06:03 PM
Quote from: SGOS on April 04, 2015, 02:02:22 PM
Conservapedia sounds like a combination of "conservative" and "Wikipedia."  Is it like Wikipedia for right wingers?  Is it affiliated with the real Wikipedia?

Edit:  More importantly, is its purpose to dispense information,    or propaganda?
Yes and I seriously doubt it.
A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticise work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life’s realities â€" all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority but of weakness. -TR

SGOS

#6
April 04, 2015, 02:09:24 PM
Holy Crap, I guess this answers my question.  It's just a right wing site that uses Wikipedia's name.  Scan the following for a "fair and unbalanced" Fox News type explanation of evolution:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution

Mermaid

#7
April 04, 2015, 02:26:09 PM
Ahahahahahahahahahhahahahah
A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticise work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life’s realities â€" all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority but of weakness. -TR

trdsf

#8
April 04, 2015, 03:28:40 PM
Conservapedia is to truth and reliability as North Korea is to freedom and democracy.  Remember, these were the guys behind the Conservative re-edit of the Bible...
"My faith in the Constitution is whole, it is complete, it is total, and I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction of the Constitution." -- Barbara Jordan

SGOS

#9
April 04, 2015, 03:51:04 PM
Quote from: trdsf on April 04, 2015, 03:28:40 PM
Remember, these were the guys behind the Conservative re-edit of the Bible...
OK, that explains a lot.

Aletheia

#10
April 04, 2015, 04:31:14 PM
Was I the only one who had an Orwellian experience while reading that?
Quote from: Jakenessif you believe in the supernatural, you do not understand modern science. Period.

Sargon The Grape

#11
April 04, 2015, 05:19:54 PM
How can you doubt that this article is true? It says right up in the corner that Conservapedia is the trustworthy encyclopedia! :lol:
Speak when you have something to say, not when you have to say something.

My Youtube Channel

MagetheEntertainer

#12
April 04, 2015, 05:37:55 PM
Quote from: Mermaid on April 04, 2015, 01:13:04 PM
This seems to be every myth, lie and misconception about atheists on one neat web page.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_Morality

Wait a minute, I though all Atheist had a basement full of dead hookers!  Or is that just me?

Mermaid

#13
April 04, 2015, 05:44:25 PM
Quote from: MagetheEntertainer on April 04, 2015, 05:37:55 PM
Wait a minute, I though all Atheist had a basement full of dead hookers!  Or is that just me?
What the hell? Did you not get the memo?
A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticise work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life’s realities â€" all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority but of weakness. -TR

SGOS

#14
April 04, 2015, 06:49:30 PM Last Edit: April 04, 2015, 06:51:35 PM by SGOS
Here's what Wikipedia says about Conservapedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia

Here's what Conservapedia says about Wikipedia:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Wikipedia

Each is critical of the other.
Print
Go Up Pages1 2 3
User actions