Time For Athests To Prove There Is No God.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

No.  I reject your infantile attempt to shift the burden of proof.

Problem for you: Reality has an atheistic bias. Your imaginary friend exists nowhere but in your head.

[PickelledEggs]

Atheists, time for you to present evidence that there is no God. And don't say that it is up to theists to present evidence of God. That is copping out. Also, don't say that you can't prove a negative. That is not true. The negative can be proven. It's just harder, because you have to prove the whole medium. Also, don't state that you can't prove something that doesn't exist. That is stupid, and assumes something not yet proven. If God doesn't exist, as you atheists obviously believe, then there must be a logical reason why He doesn't. I say logic, not philosophic, like "why does God allow bad things to happen". If you ask for a definition of God, He is the Deity, the first "being", the Supreme being who creates all things and has existed for all time, being omniscient and omnipotent.

lol

Go fuck yourself with your coming in here and giving us orders

[SGOS]

Well, don't keep me in suspense - did you ever regain some semblance of consciousness?

zzzzzzz

[sdelsolray]

Problem for you: Reality has an atheistic bias. Your imaginary friend exists nowhere but in your head.

Are you sure you quoted the right post?  My comment was addressed to the OP.

[Mr.Obvious]

Are you sure you quoted the right post?  My comment was addressed to the OP.

Starting to think you attract this kind of thing.

[Sargon The Grape]

I love how he started ignoring this thread after I posted my argument. I think Casperov is the only person' who's ever had the balls to try responding.

[Baruch]

One time, I even replied to somebody's post, but somehow ended up posting it in a different thread.  Of course, being in a different thread, my reply made no sense whatsoever.  I don't even know how I managed to put it in a different thread.  But the really weird thing was that no one even bothered commenting on it.  Maybe they figured I had posted something that was beyond their personal ability to comprehend.  More likely, they probably thought I was once again lost in my own incomprehensible mental chaos, and that I would regain some semblance of consciousness if they just let me be.

This is why editing, and cross-referencing is your friend.

[Baruch]

Does god know beforehand what he will do? If he does, then he is incapable to have any will of any sort, and merely is an autonom. And can he do impossible things?

All your meandering is just fanciful play on language and thereof semantics.

We have the son of Muad' Dib to fix that for us.  Leto II restored free will.

[Baruch]

Well, for all we know you could be a chat-bot - but if so, you're a pretty damned good one!

If I were a chat bot who voted for Donald ... I would by yuuuuge!  Sorry, as Tay showed a year ago, chat bots tend to de-evolve into raving bigots and Nazis.  Hitler was a android.

[Baruch]

The Q Continuum could be considered Geek mythology...

In Star Trek classic, Kirk beat the Greek gods not once, but twice.  The first time because Apollo was messing with Kirk's girl ;-)  Viking gods would have been a better challenge.  "I challenge you to drink a barrel of mead in one gulp!".

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Are you sure you quoted the right post?  My comment was addressed to the OP.

Sorry, that comment was aimed at Gourd's Massager.

[fencerider]

"If God doesn't exist, there must be some logical explanation that proves he doesn't exist"

That argument assumes we live in a logical universe where everything can be explained. I have yet to see a logical argument that proves god exists. Maybe OP can provide one.

Here's a classic: The universe can not exist without being created. The universe exists, therefore it was created. God exists. - "the universe can not exist without being created" is not a premise. It is the conclusion of an argument that hasn't been presented. Without any proof of being a true statement it is a faulty premise in a logical argument.

Let's see your logical argument that god exists. Then you can either be the first to provide a real logical argument for the existence of god or we can correct your mistakes.

[PickelledEggs]

I love how he started ignoring this thread after I posted my argument. I think Casperov is the only person' who's ever had the balls to try responding.

He was banned. Don't think too highly of yourself.

[Hydra009]

Starting to think you attract this kind of thing.

It's the avatar.  The god-botherers rarely take the time to set an avatar.  So if you're an AF vet and you don't have an avatar, you run the risk of getting confused with them.

[SGOS]

Here's a classic: The universe can not exist without being created. The universe exists, therefore it was created. God exists. - "the universe can not exist without being created" is not a premise. It is the conclusion of an argument that hasn't been presented. Without any proof of being a true statement it is a faulty premise in a logical argument.

Not a premise!  That clears something up that has been niggling the back of my brain for a long time.