Why it's important to be honest about the Ghostbusters remake

[Hydra009]

In the written example you used, the writer flows along well enough, and he does offer a kind of wordsmith flair, but I agree that he doesn't have a whole Hell of a lot to say.  Actually, I'm suspicious that he's more of a pitchman than a seriously reviewer.

Yep.  Could be a shill who never even saw the movie.  We wouldn't know the difference.  By relying on a long-established critic like Ebert, that risk is significantly reduced.