"Ark Encounter" Opens Today

[alexxmedeiros]

You are brainless by your statements and continuous question.  What is truth?

"You ARE" is an absolute statement. You gave up absolutes a long time ago....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[alexxmedeiros]

What do you mean by "evidence assumes truth"?

Do you doubt the information provided by your senses?

Evidence must be true. If you have never murdered anyone there can be no evidence that you have.

You have no reason to trust your senses, do you?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[alexxmedeiros]

First you have to define "crap" and "fart", and then you have to define "often".  Those are all knowledge terms and you can't have knowledge without truth and you can't have truth without his version of god.

You did a decent job there glad you're understanding some of my position.

It's not my version of God, it's the one and only God.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Evidence must be true. If you have never murdered anyone there can be no evidence that you have.

You have no reason to trust your senses, do you?

If you are not a person who regularly doubts the information of his senses, then you have no reason to ask how I know something is true.

[Hijiri Byakuren]

You did a decent job there glad you're understanding some of my position.

It's not my version of God, it's the one and only God.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There are many versions of God. Yours is #2136 on the list of ones I've been accused of defying.


Equal opportunity butt-stabber.

[Mike Cl]

"You ARE" is an absolute statement. You gave up absolutes a long time ago....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Answer the question.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Answer the question.

Do trolls actually do that?

[Jason Harvestdancer]

You did a decent job there glad you're understanding some of my position.

It's not my version of God, it's the one and only God.

Odin's beard!

[Mike Cl]

Do trolls actually do that?

No, I suppose not. :))

[alexxmedeiros]

If you are not a person who regularly doubts the information of his senses, then you have no reason to ask how I know something is true.

What I am saying is that you have no basis to trust your reasoning and senses, so you have no basis to determine whether something is true or false.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[alexxmedeiros]

If you are not a person who regularly doubts the information of his senses, then you have no reason to ask how I know something is true.

What I am saying is that you have no basis to trust your reasoning and senses, so you have no basis to determine whether something is true or false.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[alexxmedeiros]

Answer the question.

Truth is that which corresponds to reality. You can not know which reality is the right one nor can you trust that your reasoning and senses are valid. You can not have truth, just preference. Atheism fails every time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Jason Harvestdancer]

What I am saying is that you have no basis to trust your reasoning and senses, so you have no basis to determine whether something is true or false.

So what you're saying is...

If you believe in an all-powerful being capable of fooling your senses, then you have reason to trust your senses
But..
If you don't believe in an all-powerful being capable of fooling your senses, then you have no reason to trust your senses.

This is supposed to make sense?

[alexxmedeiros]

So what you're saying is...

If you believe in an all-powerful being capable of fooling your senses, then you have reason to trust your senses
But..
If you don't believe in an all-powerful being capable of fooling your senses, then you have no reason to trust your senses.

This is supposed to make sense?

No I'm saying thatI have justification for trusting my senses, you don't.

Tell me this, could you be wrong about everything you claim to know?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Your justification for believing your senses is that you believe in a being capable of fooling your senses.
You say that unless one believes in a being capable of fooling the senses, then one has no reason to trust the senses.

No, I cannot be wrong about everything I know because I know I exist.  If I am wrong about that, then who is wrong about that?