Started by stromboli, January 01, 2016, 11:04:12 PM
QuoteTwin myths undergird the claim by Israeli hardliners that they own the land of Palestine: the Biblical stories about the Exodus and the ancient kings of Israel and the claim that the Romans forced the Diaspora of Jews to Europe, a fiction that a brave Israeli scholar exploded, as Morgan Strong reported in 2009.The founding narrative of the modern State of Israel was born from the words of Moses in the Old Testament, that God ordered the Jewish people to conquer the land of Israel and that it was to be theirs for all time (a promise supposedly given originally to Abraham).Then, there was the story of the Diaspora â€" that after Jewish uprisings against the Romans in the First and Second centuries A.D., the Jews were exiled from the land of Israel and dispersed throughout the Western world. They often were isolated from European populations, suffered persecution, and ultimately were marked for extermination in the Nazi Holocaust.Finally after centuries of praying for a return to Israel, the Jews achieved this goal by defeating the Arab armies in Palestine and establishing Israel in 1948. This narrative â€" spanning more than three millennia â€" is the singular, elemental and sustaining claim of the State of Israel as a Jewish nation.But a 2008 book by Israeli scholar Shlomo Sand challenges this narrative, claiming that â€" beyond the religious question of whether God really spoke to Abraham and Moses â€" the Roman-era Diaspora did not happen at all or at least not as commonly understood.In When and How Was the Jewish People Invented?, Dr. Sand, an expert on European history at the University of Tel Aviv, says the Diaspora was largely a myth â€" that the Jews were never exiled en masse from the Holy Land and that many European Jewish populations converted to the faith centuries later. (Sandâ€™s book was published in English as The Invention of the Jewish People.)Thus, Sand argues, many of todayâ€™s Israelis who emigrated from Europe after World War II have little or no genealogical connection to the land. According to Sandâ€™s historical analysis, they are descendents of European converts, principally from the Kingdom of the Khazars in eastern Russia, who embraced Judaism in the Eighth Century, A.D.The descendants of the Khazars then were driven from their native lands by invasion and conquest and â€" through this migration â€" created the Jewish populations of Eastern Europe, Sands writes. Similarly, he argues that the Jews of Spain came from the conversion of Berber tribes from northern Africa that later migrated into Europe.The Zionist NarrativeSand, himself a European Jew born in 1946 to Holocaust survivors in Austria, argues that until little more than a century ago, Jews thought of themselves as Jews because they shared a common religion, not because they possessed a direct lineage to the ancient tribes of Israel.However, at the turn of the 20th Century, Sand asserts, Zionist Jews began assembling a national history to justify creation of a Jewish state by inventing the idea that Jews existed as a people separate from their religion and that they had primogeniture over the territory that had become known as Palestine.The Zionists also invented the idea that Jews living in exile were obligated to return to the Promised Land, a concept that had been foreign to Judaism, Sand states.Like almost everything in the Middle East, this scholarship is fraught with powerful religious, historical and political implications. If Sandâ€™s thesis is correct, it would suggest that many of the Palestinian Arabs have a far more substantial claim to the lands of Israel than do many European Jews who arrived there asserting a God-given claim.Indeed, Sand theorizes that many Jews, who remained in Judea after Roman legions crushed the last uprising in 136 A.D., eventually converted to Christianity or Islam, meaning that the Palestinians who have been crowded into Gaza or concentrated in the West Bank might be direct descendants of Jews from the Roman era.Despite the political implications of Sandâ€™s book, it has not faced what might be expected: a withering assault from right-wing Israelis. The criticism has focused mostly on Sandâ€™s credentials as an expert on European history, not ancient Middle Eastern history, a point that Sand readily acknowledges.One critic, Israel Bartal, dean of humanities at the Hebrew University, attacked Sandâ€™s credentials and called Sandâ€™s thesis â€œbaseless,â€ but disagreed mostly over Sandâ€™s assertion that the Diaspora story was created as an intentional myth by Zionists seeking to fabricate a direct genealogical connection between many of the worldâ€™s Jews and Israel.â€œAlthough the myth of an exile from the Jewish homeland (Palestine) does exist in popular Israeli culture, it is negligible in serious Jewish historical discussions,â€ Bartal wrote in the newspaper Haaretz. â€œImportant groups in the Jewish national movement expressed reservations regarding this myth or denied it completely. â€¦â€œThe kind of political intervention Sand is talking about, namely, a deliberate program designed to make Israelis forget the true biological origins of the Jews of Poland and Russia or a directive for the promotion of the story of the Jewsâ€™ exile from their homeland is pure fantasy.â€In other words, Bartal, like some other critics, is not so much disputing Sandâ€™s historical claims about the Diaspora or the origins of Eastern European Jews, as he is contesting Sandâ€™s notion that Zionists concocted a false history for a cynical political purpose.But there can be no doubt that the story of the Diaspora has played a key role in the founding of Israel and that the appeal of this powerful narrative has helped the Jewish state generate sympathy around the world, especially in the United States.â€œAfter being forcibly exiled from their land, the people remained faithful to it throughout their Dispersion and never ceased to pray and hope for their return to it and for the restoration in it of their political freedom,â€ reads the preamble to the Israeli Declaration of Independence.Reality from MythologyIn January 2009, as the Israeli army bombarded Palestinians in Gaza in retaliation for rockets fired into southern Israel, the world got an ugly glimpse of what can result when historical myths are allowed to drive wedges between people who otherwise might have a great deal in common.After the conflict ended â€" with some 1,400 Palestinians dead, including many children and other non-combatants â€" the Israeli government investigated alleged war crimes by its army and heard testimony from Israeli troops that extremist Rabbis had proclaimed the invasion a holy war.The troops said the Rabbis brought them booklets and articles declaring: â€œWe are the Jewish people. We came to this land by a miracle. God brought us back to this land, and now we need to fight to expel the non-Jews who are interfering with our conquest of this holy land.â€In his book â€" and in an interview with Haaretz about his book â€" Sand challenged this core myth. In the interview, he said:â€œI started looking in research studies about the exile from the land â€" a constitutive event in Jewish history, almost like the Holocaust. But to my astonishment I discovered that it has no literature. The reason is that no one exiled the people of the country.â€œThe Romans did not exile peoples and they could not have done so even if they had wanted to. They did not have trains and trucks to deport entire populations. That kind of logistics did not exist until the 20th Century. From this, in effect, the whole book was born: in the realization that Judaic society was not dispersed and was not exiled.â€The True Descendants Asked if he was saying that the true descendants of the inhabitants of the Kingdom of Judah are the Palestinians, Sand responded:â€œNo population remains pure over a period of thousands of years. But the chances that the Palestinians are descendants of the ancient Judaic people are much greater than the chances that you or I are its descendents.â€œThe first Zionists, up until the Arab Revolt [1936-1939], knew that there had been no exiling, and that the Palestinians were descended from the inhabitants of the land. They knew that farmers donâ€™t leave until they are expelled.â€œEven Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, the second president of the State of Israel, wrote in 1929 that, â€˜the vast majority of the peasant farmers do not have their origins in the Arab conquerors, but rather, before then, in the Jewish farmers who were numerous and a majority in the building of the land.â€™â€Sand argues further that the Jewish people never existed as a â€œnation raceâ€ but were rather an ethnic mix of disparate peoples who adopted the Jewish religion over a great period of time. Sand dismisses the Zionist argument that the Jews were an isolated and seminal ethnic group that was targeted for dispersal by the Romans.Although ruthless in putting down challenges to their rule, the Romans allowed subjects in their occupied territories a great many freedoms, including freedom to practice religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of assembly.Thousands of Jews served in the Roman legions, and there was a sizable Jewish community in Rome itself. Three Jewish descendants of Herod the Great, the Jewish Emperor of Jerusalem, served in the Roman Senate.Jewish dietary laws were respected under Roman law, as well as the right not to work on the Sabbath. Jewish slaves â€" 1,000 carried to Italy by Emperor Titus after crushing the first Jewish rebellion in 70 A.D. â€" were bought and set free by Jewish families already long settled into Roman society.After the final Jewish rebellion, the Bar Kokhba revolt of 132-136 A.D., historians say the Romans placed restrictions on Jews entering Jerusalem, which caused other areas, such as Galilee in northern Palestine, to become centers of Jewish learning. But there is little or no evidence of a mass forced relocation.Sand says the Diaspora was originally a Christian myth that depicted the event as divine punishment imposed on the Jews for having rejected the Christian gospel.Genetic EvidenceThere has been no serious rebuttal to Sandâ€™s book, which has been a bestseller in Israel and Europe. But there were earlier genetic studies attempting to demonstrate an unbroken line of descent among Ashkenazi Jews in Europe from the Hebrew tribes of Israel.In a genetic study published by the United States National Academy of Sciences, the Y chromosomes of Ashkenazi, Roman, North African, Kurdish, Near Eastern, Yemenite, and Ethiopian Jews were compared with 16 non-Jewish groups from similar geographic locations. It found that despite long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level.Although the study also demonstrated that 20 percent of the Ashkenazim carry Eastern European gene markers consistent with the Khazars, the results seemed to show that the Ashkenazim were descended from a common Mid-Eastern population and suggested that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora.However, a monumental genetic study entitled, â€œThe Journey of Man,â€ undertaken in 2002 by Dr. Spencer Wells, a geneticist from Stanford University, demonstrated that virtually all Europeans males carry the same genetic markers found within the male population of the Middle East on the Y chromosomes.That is simply because the migration of human beings began in Africa and coursed its way through the Middle East and onward, stretching over many thousands of years. In short, we are all pretty much the same.Obsessive DelusionDespite the lack of conclusive scientific or historical evidence, the Diaspora narrative proved to be a compelling story, much like the Biblical rendition of the Exodus from Egypt, which historians and archeologists also have questioned in recent years.It is certainly true that all nations use myths and legend for sustenance; some tales are based on fact, others are convenient self-serving contrivances. However, when myth and legend argue for excess, when they demand a racial, ethnic or religious purity to the exclusion of others â€" so that some prophecy can be fulfilled or some national goal achieved â€" reason and justice can give way to extremism and cruelty.The motive for creating the state of Israel was to provide respite for the Jews of Europe after World War II, but that worthy cause has now been contorted into an obsessive delusion about an Israeli right to mistreat and persecute Palestinians.When right-wing Israeli Rabbis speak of driving non-Jews out of the land that God supposedly gave to the Israelites and their descendants, these Rabbis may be speaking with full faith, but faith is by definition an unshakable belief in something that taken by itself cannot be proven.This faith â€" or delusion â€" also is drawing in the rest of the world. The bloody war in Iraq was an appendage to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as is the dangerous rise of Islamic fundamentalism across the region.There is also now the irony that modern Israel was established by Jews of European origin, many of whom may be ethnically unconnected to Palestine. Another cruel aspect of this irony is that the descendants of the ancient Israelites may include many Palestinians, who are genetically indistinct from the Sephardic Jews who were, like the Palestinians, original and indigenous inhabitants of this ancient land.Yasir Arafat told me quite often that the Israelis are really cousins of the Palestinians. He may have been wrong; they are more likely brothers and sisters.
Quote from: Hakurei Reimu on January 02, 2016, 12:08:41 AMHebrew is semitic, same as Egyptian and Arabic. I'm not actually surprised.
QuoteSand argues further that the Jewish people never existed as a â€œnation raceâ€ but were rather an ethnic mix of disparate peoples who adopted the Jewish religion over a great period of time. Sand dismisses the Zionist argument that the Jews were an isolated and seminal ethnic group that was targeted for dispersal by the Romans.Although ruthless in putting down challenges to their rule, the Romans allowed subjects in their occupied territories a great many freedoms, including freedom to practice religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of assembly.Thousands of Jews served in the Roman legions, and there was a sizable Jewish community in Rome itself. Three Jewish descendants of Herod the Great, the Jewish Emperor of Jerusalem, served in the Roman Senate.Jewish dietary laws were respected under Roman law, as well as the right not to work on the Sabbath. Jewish slaves â€" 1,000 carried to Italy by Emperor Titus after crushing the first Jewish rebellion in 70 A.D. â€" were bought and set free by Jewish families already long settled into Roman society.After the final Jewish rebellion, the Bar Kokhba revolt of 132-136 A.D., historians say the Romans placed restrictions on Jews entering Jerusalem, which caused other areas, such as Galilee in northern Palestine, to become centers of Jewish learning. But there is little or no evidence of a mass forced relocation.
Quote from: stromboli on January 01, 2016, 11:04:12 PMExodus has long been considered to be mythical and historic evidence indicates that Judaism grew up in ancient Canaan; after the Babylonian captivity, a monotheistic religion grew out of a polytheistic one.
Quote from: Baruch on January 02, 2016, 01:39:01 AMOf course this applies to Arabs, Muslims, Americans, Mormons etc ... basically everyone. People tell stories.
Quote from: Solomon Zorn on January 02, 2016, 07:24:20 AMFascinating, Strom. Thanks for posting it.According to a Mormon genealogy one of my relatives had traced, my family arrived in America in 1767. I have often wondered how reliable that date was.
Quote from: stromboli on January 02, 2016, 08:49:48 AM@Drunkenshoe: Pharaonic and Egyptian records of events based on known periods in Egypt give a better accounting than any record left by anyone who would have been a slave, which makes sense. Likewise a culture that valued their monuments and built them to such purpose would not use slave labor because that does not provide skilled craftsmanship. Historic reenactments that I've seen of how the pyramids were built showed not only skilled craftsmanship but also that those craftsmen were likely a guild or even families that passed their skills on to the next generation. In other words, not slaves.