In Case You Didn't Think Republicans Are Stupider Than Democrats

[stromboli]

https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2015/10/Presidential-debate.jpg&w=1484




Note that the graphic is about THE FOLLOWERS, NOT THE CANDIDATES.

[Hijiri Byakuren]

[drunkenshoe]

That's interesting.

Could this also be an indicator that primary school education sucks in certain regions? I don't think this is about stupidity. You guys are learning your language twice. Once when learning to speak and then again when you learn reading and writing.

For example, I don't have that experience with English, because I learned it altogether; reading, writing  and speaking.

It is also about how much people write and read and how they see 'language ' in every way.

[Baruch]

Notice Clinton and Fiorina are twins separated at birth, grammar wise ;-)

[Atheon]

It also correlates rather well with how evil the candidates are.

[trdsf]

And another piece of the Republican war on education falls into place: an electorate that can think, won't vote for them.

[josephpalazzo]

And another piece of the Republican war on education falls into place: an electorate that can think, won't vote for them.

Problem is that the "electorate that can think" is shrinking in numbers.

[Baruch]

Problem is that the "electorate that can think" is shrinking in numbers.

Yes, us Baby Boomers were G-d's gift, and we are dying off now that the oldest of us are 70 ;-)

[AllPurposeAtheist]

This is a lot of help,  confirmation bias. We've confirmed republicans aren't very good with grammar. That doesn't translate to anything at all at the ballot box. The party of rubes will only paint this as they always have and probably always will as liberal elitism and go on their merry way.
Is anyone under the illusion that some republican voter will suddenly wake up and say, "Gosh! I'm voting with a bunch of illiterates!" ?
Yeah, I didn't think so.