News:

Welcome to our site!

Main Menu

Rabbis on God

Started by kowalskil, September 30, 2015, 06:05:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

josephpalazzo

Quote from: stromboli on October 02, 2015, 09:31:29 PM
My math is along the lines of measure twice, cut once.

(Jeopardy) What is topology?

Baruch

Not answering for Stromboli and carpentry ... but cutting isn't allowed in topology, just stretching and folding the clothes after being cleaned ;-)
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

josephpalazzo

Quote from: Baruch on October 03, 2015, 06:29:11 AM
Not answering for Stromboli and carpentry ... but cutting isn't allowed in topology, just stretching and folding the clothes after being cleaned ;-)

You're right I was thinking of Dedekind cut, which is more in set theory than in topology.

Baruch

Yes, if your daughter mentions the Dedekind Cut ... call 911!  She responds with ... "get Real, dad".
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

josephpalazzo

Quote from: Baruch on October 03, 2015, 11:10:54 AM
Yes, if your daughter mentions the Dedekind Cut ... call 911!  She responds with ... "get Real, dad".

Does that mean you need extra care when you raise a daughter?!??

Baruch

Maybe knot (calling knot theorist) ... a topologist father wouldn't be concerned with anorexia/bulemia ... since the "genus" of his daughter is still the same (technically a toroid, just like our worm ancestors).
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

josephpalazzo

Quote from: Baruch on October 03, 2015, 11:21:04 AM
Maybe knot (calling knot theorist) ... a topologist father wouldn't be concerned with anorexia/bulemia ... since the "genus" of his daughter is still the same (technically a toroid, just like our worm ancestors).

Yikes, I ain't responding this...

Baruch

Don't you think that embryology is a fertile place for topological research? ;-)
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.


Baruch

Time lapse of an embryo, first it is a sphere, then it folds in on itself ... plus my use of "fertile".
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

josephpalazzo

Research... no. All topological spaces have already been explored. I would classify this kind of research as infertile. (Euler is not proud of you).

Baruch

Really?  The general metrizability problem (of a topological space) remains ... well worked, but not completely solved.  So further research there, will continue to impinge metrical theories like GR.
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

josephpalazzo

Granted but it has nothing with embryos. The biologists don't have to learn topology.