Dear Mr.Spinoza

[dtq123]

Please fill out the following experiments and see how you turn out! I've posted these before, but I'm not sure if you've had a chance to play with them. Since you lasted more than several days on our site, I'd like to get to know you better in a way that's easiest for me. Thanks for posting your results in advance, If you ask I'll give you my results and my interpretation of them. Thanks.

http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/euthyphro/Default.aspx
http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/health/Default.aspx
http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/god/Default.aspx

[AllPurposeAtheist]

I experimented and found out that I have to click the links which I haven't done so far. . Truth be told I have little faith in psychological experiments and the hokum involved with many of them.

[dtq123]

I experimented and found out that I have to click the links which I haven't done so far. . Truth be told I have little faith in psychological experiments and the hokum involved with many of them.

They're just for reactions silly! You think I believe more than half of the shit?
Some of it is worth it though, just moral consistency stuff.

[Sal1981]

http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/euthyphro/Default.aspx

I think that a god is logically possible, but the classical attributes I find to be logically contradictory, so though I think a god might be omnipowerful within a logical framework (none of these "make a stone so heavy he can't lift it" deals, please). Although I think there are moral standards, these are standards, I don't believe in objective morality or whatever a god does makes makes it automatically good (stinks of Divine Command Theory, IMO)

http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/health/Default.aspx

I don't entirely understand the framework and definition of "tensions", I scored 20, where the average is 27(?). But I agree with the analysis.

http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/god/Default.aspx

I agree with the hits, but not the 1 bullet I was hit with, which was about evolution, It claims there's  no definitive proof for evolution, and that there is no definitive proof for a god, but that I stated I wanted definitive proof for a god before believing in it. The problem with this is there's no definitive proof for anything; science doesn't work that way, and a definitive proof for god would be extant, since it would very well in the power to produce such result for a deity if it existed, and easily so.

[Baruch]

Sorry I missed this dtiq123.  I don't follow all strings ... that would be crazy!  I have played with Beliefnet survey before, and my "pegging" changes a little each time I try it.  I actually did these awhile back ... and I got a high score about ethics ... because I take integrity seriously.  If is a shameful thing for anyone self-identifying as Jewish, to score low on ethics (yes, I know about bad Jews).  Of course if someone has less integrity, then does their having more than one "person" in their head ... disqualify them as "serious"?  Isn't that "integrity-ism" ... kind of like "species-ism"?  Or just another bigotry against yet another handicap ... if one allows oneself to be that condescending.  Don't have time to redo them just now ... but if I find the time ...