Hello

[Moriarty]

Conservative atheist here. Not sure there are many on here but willing to give this page a try.

What a bunch of BS.  You're homophobic why?  What good reason to you as an atheist have to judge anything?
Irish.

"You're about as useful as a poopy flavored lollipop."--Patches

[The Skeletal Atheist]

Conservative atheist here. Not sure there are many on here but willing to give this page a try.

What a bunch of BS.  You're homophobic why?  What good reason to you as an atheist have to judge anything?
Irish.

I have to thank you then laugh at the lack of self awareness.

[Aletheia]

Walks in, sees the disco ball smashed to bits on the floor. Obviously no love lost here... 

You do realize you're making a big deal out of the adult version of cooties, right? You don't like gays because it makes you feel "icky."

People will be different from you. It's a fact of life. We can't all be homogeneous. Variation is the driving force of life, and always has been.

And no, nature does not always use the "parent begets children" method of ensuring gene transfer. For example, ants work together to ensure the queen survives long enough to reproduce even though all the workers will never get a chance. Why? Because the queen shares some of the same genes as the workers. Gays are about as useful as menopausal women in the group. They typically don't reproduce or do so sparingly, but are invaluable to helping the next generation of a group of relatives who share many of the same genes. When resources are rare, then quantity of offspring is counter effective to quality of offspring. This is just one manner in which gays could have evolved with a natural purpose. Remember, evolution is usually from the perspective of the gene, not so much the individual or the species.