translated article: Failed assault on Brussels: Nail bomb didn't go off.

[Mr.Obvious]

Failed assault on Brussels: Nail bomb didn't go off.
21 june 2017 at 08:49 by Kasper Hermans

At station Brussels-central an assault failed following the perpetrator's bomb's failure to detonate. A little while before there was a small explosion in his trunk, which allowed to security services to track him down and eventually shoot and kill him. The authorities suspect this was a terrorist act.

Detonation mechanism

According to the Belgian broadcasting station VRT the visible explosion was the detonation mechanism which the man activated. But one way or another the bomb itself failed to go off. And a good thing too, as it was a large bomb which could have done massive damage.

Witnesses report that the perpetrator screamed out 'Allahu Ackbar' right before the explosion. There has been no official statement on his identity. The police is said to be conductiong home-searches, though minister of internal affairs, Jan Jambon, doesn't wish to confirm that yet.

Police-State

Jambon did answer on how things will go from here. "We need to think about the kind of society we want to live in, are we truly going to lock everything down with controles? Do we truly wish to live in such a country? If you really want to make everywhere safe and have everything controled, you find yourself in a Police State."

The damage at Brussels-Central is being repeared as we speak. The public transport on the small, subterranean station, and also in multiple different station the European Capitol, were shut down after the failed attempt. Only wednseday-morning did things get back on track, after the search for evidence was concluded.

source: https://www.metronieuws.nl/nieuws/buitenland/2017/06/mislukte-aanslag-brussel-spijkerbom-ontplofte-niet



No 72 Virgins for you.

Fun fact. Jambon is French for ham.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

The packing coefficient of nails is lousy. They need to revamp their strategy and use ball bearings or buck shot. Fuckin' amateurs are giving terror a bad name.

[pr126]

Muslims have every right to freely practice their religion.

What no one wants to understand is that their religion mandates to fight and kill the unbelievers wherever they find them.

Quran 9:5

But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

I almost forgot.  #NOTALLMUSLIMS

[Gawdzilla Sama]

What no one wants to understand is

Bad phrase to use.

[Baruch]

American civic "religion" since 1945 mandates that we make all other nations, our bitches!

[Unbeliever]

Apparently, both Christians and Muslims have a "great Commission" to convert every single human to their religion, and those who won't be converted are to die.

All holy books are bad, m'kay?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Apparently, both Christians and Muslims have a "great Commission" to convert every single human to their religion, and those who won't be converted are to die.

All holy books are bad, m'kay?

I don't know about that, Lord of Light and Creatures of Light and Darkness were pretty cool.

[Unbeliever]

Holy Book, Batman!

[Baruch]

Apparently, both Christians and Muslims have a "great Commission" to convert every single human to their religion, and those who won't be converted are to die.

All holy books are bad, m'kay?

And comic books are the worst! ;-)

[pr126]

.


The Islam in Islamic Terrorism: The Importance of Beliefs, Ideas, and Ideology

Ibn Warraq addresses several misconceptions regarding the cause of Islamic terrorism. Many scholars refuse to take into account the beliefs of the terrorists, and many seem to think that Islamic terrorism has emerged only in the last forty years or so. Many analysts believe that the United States was targeted because of its foreign policy, while others opine that we have to dig out the root causes which are essentially socioeconomic, with poverty as the favorite explanation. Ibn Warraq, on the other hand, argues that we must take the beliefs of the jihadists seriously. The acts of ISIS or the Taliban or any other jihadist group are not random acts of violence by a mob of psychopathic, sexually frustrated, impoverished vandals, but carefully and strategically planned operations that are a part of a long campaign by educated, affluent Muslims who wish to bring about the establishment of an Islamic state based on the Shari a, the Islamic Holy Law derived from the Koran, the Sunna and the Hadith. Nor did Islamic terrorism emerge, ex nihilo, in the past forty years or so. From its foundation in the seventh century, violent movements have arisen seeking to revive true Islam, which its members felt had been neglected in Muslim societies, who were not living up to the ideals of the earliest Muslims. Thus, the answer to the cause of Islamic terrorism, according to Ibn Warraq, lies in Islamic theology (especially the concepts of jihad and Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong), and Islamic history, both of which he examines closely. This is borne out by what the Islamists themselves tell us, hence Ibn Warraq s detailed examination of the writings of key Islamic thinkers of the past, such as Ibn Taymiyya, and modern activists, from Mawdudi to Khomeini.

[Baruch]

Islamic Terrorism is ...
1. Caused by Islam
2. Caused by blowback from terrorists used by the West against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan and in Chechnya
3. Caused by Russia using the same techniques as the West, against the West
4. Desire by the EU elites to replaces their own population with a people more amenable to slavery
5. CIA and MI6 psyops for their own purposes or for the various elites ... the terrorists aren't rogue, they still work for the West, but against the West

Why choose one?  Could be all five ;-(

[pr126]

I don't think so.
Islamic terrorism is 14 centuries old.


https://youtu.be/t_Qpy0mXg8Y

People here will have no problem asserting that Christian terrorism is two centuries old.
Why not about Islam?
Because Islamic history does not exist in western education.
The only thing is taught is the "Golden Age". And 1001 Islamic Inventions.
Other than that, nothing else happened for 14 centuries that is worth mentioning.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Your agenda is noted.

[Baruch]

I don't think so.
Islamic terrorism is 14 centuries old.


https://youtu.be/t_Qpy0mXg8Y

People here will have no problem asserting that Christian terrorism is two centuries old.
Why not about Islam?
Because Islamic history does not exist in western education.
The only thing is taught is the "Golden Age". And 1001 Islamic Inventions.
Other than that, nothing else happened for 14 centuries that is worth mentioning.

And human bullshit is Paleolithic.  So you love your European elites then?  OK ... enjoy being a towel boy to the Bilderbergers.

I agree we don't teach real history ... just presently useful propaganda.  If we really taught our children, they would all commit suicide ;-(

[Shiranu]

People here will have no problem asserting that Christian terrorism is two centuries old.

Name someone here who will assert that.