Can't say I blame 'em either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHAT96JdGWc
I don't agree with them saying, "Showing kids boobs ain't cool." They're just boobs. You see the male version all the damn time, alright, kids are not going to be traumatized by a few bare-chested women. Other than that, this is awesome in every way.
Naked women have been around millennia longer than religion. More homphobia and misogyny from our xtian friends.
I've often said, kids spend 12 months sucking on a pair of tits, and then another 17 years told they can't look at them.
"Oh won't somebody think of the children!!"
This is why kids grow up to hate women, also it explains in the force heteronormative dogma why they see gay sex as so wrong.
(Stromboli adds "heteronormative" to his already extensive lexicon)
Agreed. :biggrin:
QuoteI don't agree with them saying, "Showing kids boobs ain't cool."
Seriously. Best keep your kids away from art galleries, or even worse Europe with all the nude statues around... not just boobs but wieners man... wieners all hanging and dangling. Those Romans today must really must be fucked up, what with all the classical statues around the town showing poor little children boobs and penises...
tits are a problem to church goers.
But not male nudity.
(seriously his dicks like a domestic cats, is this how big men were in the 1500s?
Quote from: Munch on August 12, 2014, 08:06:10 PM
tits are a problem to church goers.
But not male nudity.
Of course not, they have to see what the priest is eventually gonna make them service.
Quote from: Munch on August 12, 2014, 08:06:10 PM
(seriously his dicks like a domestic cats, is this how big men were in the 1500s?
I submit this man's shrinkage as further evidence of global warming.
Quote from: GSOgymrat on August 13, 2014, 06:37:16 PM
I submit this man's shrinkage as further evidence of global warming.
Warmer climates generally = bigger dicks, so not sure that holds up.
While I'm not quite sold on the effectiveness of protesting people who apparently thrive off conflict, I do favor the strip club for several reasons:
1) Their institution is older.
2) They provide a useful service for the community.
3) They don't shove anything down your throat unless you're into that sort of thing.
Those strippers ROCK,
Quote from: Shiranu on August 13, 2014, 06:53:30 PM
Warmer climates generally = bigger dicks, so not sure that holds up.
Yeah; and present time = bigger dicks then past (painting). So it does hold up. :laugh:
are tits freedom of speech?
JK
I see nothing wrong with breasts. But many parts of a woman's body is sexualized. I don't know why but through out the ages women were always treated like sex objects (unless of course they were ugly)
personally my girl parts are just fine it's the rest of my body I worry about.
Silly Christians, tits are for kids.
Quote from: baddogma on August 16, 2014, 10:35:55 PM
Silly Christians, tits are for me.
FTFY.
Has anyone done a study of how neurotic people are compared to how free their society allows them to be with regard to nudity?
In ancient Rome and Greece, large penises were seen as comical or grotesque, not sexy. They were really into pederasty back then, so for them, the ideal penis was small and thin with a foreskin--a boy's penis.
Also, note that Michelangelo's women don't look very feminine. That's because female nudes were out of the question back then; lacking any references, and having access only to male models, he simply painted men, stuck breasts on them, and left off the dicks. He really had no idea what a female body actually looked like. He tended to paint babies using the same method--as scaled-down, chubby adults. That's why his women look masculine (see the Sistine Chapel) and his baby-angels look surprisingly buff.
Quote from: Gawdzilla Sama on August 17, 2014, 08:10:48 AM
FTFY.
Has anyone done a study of how neurotic people are compared to how free their society allows them to be with regard to nudity?
I doubt that could be tested over different societies given how just talking about sex with certain cultures has people shut themselves off from talking about it, never getting a true answer.
Time to throw on my priest clothes and start protesting strip clubs. I will then tell the ladies that I hold my ministries at my house.
We really need more stripper based heroes
http://comicbookrealm.com/cover-scan/4ca9f917ac2b5e3d6b2bfed63a9f0288/l/class-comics-naked-justice-issue-2.jpg
Quote from: doorknob on August 15, 2014, 08:46:34 AM
are tits freedom of speech?
JK
I see nothing wrong with breasts. But many parts of a woman's body is sexualized. I don't know why but through out the ages women were always treated like sex objects (unless of course they were ugly)
personally my girl parts are just fine it's the rest of my body I worry about.
Tits are people too...Well, attached to roughly 1/2 of all people.