Atheistforums.com

Science Section => Science General Discussion => Physics & Cosmology => Topic started by: Jason78 on March 08, 2014, 03:16:48 AM

Title: A New Physics Theory of Life
Post by: Jason78 on March 08, 2014, 03:16:48 AM
QuotePopular hypotheses credit a primordial soup, a bolt of lightning and a colossal stroke of luck. But if a provocative new theory is correct, luck may have little to do with it. Instead, according to the physicist proposing the idea, the origin and subsequent evolution of life follow from the fundamental laws of nature and "should be as unsurprising as rocks rolling downhill."

From the standpoint of physics, there is one essential difference between living things and inanimate clumps of carbon atoms: The former tend to be much better at capturing energy from their environment and dissipating that energy as heat. Jeremy England, a 31-year-old assistant professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has derived a mathematical formula that he believes explains this capacity. The formula, based on established physics, indicates that when a group of atoms is driven by an external source of energy (like the sun or chemical fuel) and surrounded by a heat bath (like the ocean or atmosphere), it will often gradually restructure itself in order to dissipate increasingly more energy. This could mean that under certain conditions, matter inexorably acquires the key physical attribute associated with life.

Here's the full article. (//https://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140122-a-new-physics-theory-of-life/)
Title: Re: A New Physics Theory of Life
Post by: josephpalazzo on March 08, 2014, 07:59:16 AM
Great article.
Title: Re: A New Physics Theory of Life
Post by: Youssuf Ramadan on March 08, 2014, 08:23:39 AM
Interesting. Nice find!  :)
Title: Re: A New Physics Theory of Life
Post by: josephpalazzo on March 08, 2014, 08:57:16 AM
For the real article, see: Statistical physics of self-replication (//http://www.englandlab.com/uploads/7/8/0/3/7803054/2013jcpsrep.pdf).

I'm just reading it, and I'm struck by the similarity between England's calculations in that article and QFT, especially in regard to the statisticall approach as it was pioneered by Landau.