Atheistforums.com

News & General Discussion => News Stories and Current Events => Topic started by: WitchSabrina on August 10, 2013, 06:22:53 AM

Title: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: WitchSabrina on August 10, 2013, 06:22:53 AM
http://www.pawnation.com/2013/08/09/fos ... =webmail14 (http://www.pawnation.com/2013/08/09/fossil-of-tyrannosaurus-vs-triceratops-could-sell-for-10m-at-a/?ncid=webmail14)

QuoteA 68-million-year-old fossil of a Tyrannosaurus engaged in combat with a Triceratops is expected to sell for a record-breaking $10 million at auction, according to the Daily Mail U.K. The remains of both creatures are said to be among the most complete and best-preserved ever found, and one of the most important dinosaur discoveries of all time.

(//http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-global/dims3/GLOB/resize/510x600/http://www.blogcdn.com/www.pawnation.com/media/2013/08/dino-combat-fossils-5-510x600.jpg)
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: Solitary on August 10, 2013, 09:41:17 AM
:-k  The picture is neither a Tyrannosaurus nor a Triceratops fossil.   [-X  Solitary
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: SGOS on August 10, 2013, 09:49:29 AM
Quote from: "Solitary":-k  The picture is neither a Tyrannosaurus nor a Triceratops fossil.   [-X  Solitary
I couldn't speak to that, but for this thing to be real, it would be too big for my living room, anyway.
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: the_antithesis on August 10, 2013, 11:44:42 AM
It's also kind of unlikely they were engaged in combat. Fossilization doesn't really work like that.
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: Plu on August 10, 2013, 11:51:48 AM
They probably didn't die from being engaged in combat, but it could be they were fighting and then suddenly surprised by a landslide or such.
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: PopeyesPappy on August 10, 2013, 12:55:17 PM
Quote from: "Solitary":-k  The picture is neither a Tyrannosaurus nor a Triceratops fossil.   [-X  Solitary
QuoteThe dinosaurs in question are specifically Nanotyrannus lancensis, a close, smaller relative of Tyrannosaurus rex, and Chasmosaurine ceratopsian from the Triceratops family.

Tyrannosaurus. Just not tyrannosaurus rex.
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: Solitary on August 10, 2013, 01:04:12 PM
Quote from: "PopeyesPappy"
Quote from: "Solitary":-k  The picture is neither a Tyrannosaurus nor a Triceratops fossil.   [-X  Solitary
QuoteThe dinosaurs in question are specifically Nanotyrannus lancensis, a close, smaller relative of Tyrannosaurus rex, and Chasmosaurine ceratopsian from the Triceratops family.

Tyrannosaurus. Just not tyrannosaurus rex.


Thank you for clarifying that! Solitary
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: PopeyesPappy on August 10, 2013, 01:04:30 PM
Quote from: "the_antithesis"It's also kind of unlikely they were engaged in combat. Fossilization doesn't really work like that.
The forensic evidence suggests they killed each other.

QuoteThe remains show the dinosaurs in combat, each having died from the injuries inflicted by its opponent. The Tyrannosaurus' teeth were lodged in the Triceratops' skull. The Triceratop' had crushed the Tyrannosaurus' skull and chest.
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: PopeyesPappy on August 10, 2013, 01:14:47 PM
Quote from: "Solitary"Thank you for clarifying that! Solitary

You're welcome. I had the same "That's not a tyrannosaurus." thought when I saw the picture, and had to scroll through the picture captions to figure out what they were talking about.
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: Colanth on August 10, 2013, 05:07:47 PM
QuoteLindgren wants a museum to buy the fossils and put them on public display.
It's only the casts that are put on display, not the actual fossils.  They're available only to experts to study.
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: Jason78 on August 11, 2013, 08:32:53 AM
Quote from: "PopeyesPappy"
Quote from: "the_antithesis"It's also kind of unlikely they were engaged in combat. Fossilization doesn't really work like that.
The forensic evidence suggests they killed each other.

I still think that the Tyrannosaurus shot first.
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: Minimalist on August 11, 2013, 11:00:11 AM
...and the triceratops stood his ground?
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: Thumpalumpacus on August 11, 2013, 01:05:02 PM
Quote from: "PopeyesPappy"
Quote from: "the_antithesis"It's also kind of unlikely they were engaged in combat. Fossilization doesn't really work like that.
The forensic evidence suggests they killed each other.

QuoteThe remains show the dinosaurs in combat, each having died from the injuries inflicted by its opponent. The Tyrannosaurus' teeth were lodged in the Triceratops' skull. The Triceratop' had crushed the Tyrannosaurus' skull and chest.

That's just badass, stomping the life out of a tyrannosaur.
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: SGOS on August 11, 2013, 01:23:53 PM
Quote from: "Thumpalumpacus"
Quote from: "PopeyesPappy"
Quote from: "the_antithesis"It's also kind of unlikely they were engaged in combat. Fossilization doesn't really work like that.
The forensic evidence suggests they killed each other.

QuoteThe remains show the dinosaurs in combat, each having died from the injuries inflicted by its opponent. The Tyrannosaurus' teeth were lodged in the Triceratops' skull. The Triceratop' had crushed the Tyrannosaurus' skull and chest.

That's just badass, stomping the life out of a tyrannosaur.
I root for the triceratops just on general principle.  :-D
Title: Re: 68-million-year-old fossil- Impressive
Post by: Brian37 on August 12, 2013, 06:03:12 AM
Wow that looks like the Republican party platform.