Started by Absurd Atheist, November 06, 2016, 02:44:26 PM
Quote from: aitm on November 06, 2016, 02:57:54 PMOne should not argue with stupid, they have far more ammunition than you do. One must merely nod and escape without them shooting you, do not worry about them, turn your attention to the youth, they recognize stupidity quite easily once pointed out to them.
Quote from: Cavebear on November 08, 2016, 11:28:34 PMOne of the things that frustrates me about theist vs atheist discussions is that the theists just offer a biblical citation or quote or question and answering it takes a page. Something like a book that replies in equal shorthand.Like...1.1.1 The Universe is 13.666 billion years old.1.1.2 The stars formed from gas clouds.1.1.3 The planets formed around the stars.That sort of easy reply. Maybe it would really annoy them.
Quote from: Sal1981 on November 08, 2016, 11:37:32 PMNot to mention that it's, in my experience, quite skewed effort gone into each discussee argument; whereas the atheist gives pages of reasonable objection only to be met with a few passages from their holy texts.
Quote from: popsthebuilder on November 22, 2016, 10:34:16 PMAny theist refuting sound science is quite confused
Quote from: sdelsolray on November 27, 2016, 03:01:51 PMRegardless of labels, anyone who refutes sound science is a possible candidate for a Nobel Prize.
Quote from: aitm on November 24, 2016, 11:29:43 AMMy sister in law has a doctorate....but thinks a carpenter is someone who installs carpet....so....
Quote from: Cavebear on November 28, 2016, 12:56:27 AMThat is quite correct. Refutation of science errors has great value.