Welcome to our site!

Main Menu

A Question About Free Agency

Started by stromboli, July 29, 2014, 09:45:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic


QuoteQuestion: What is free moral agency?

    Answer: While the precise expression "free moral agency" is not found in the scriptures as such, the concept is present. By "free" is meant the enjoyment of certain rights, "moral" suggests right principles or conduct, and "agency" refers to the state or being of exerting power or choice.

    God has endowed man with freedom of choice. The scriptures urge man to "choose," "come unto me," and "open the door" (Josh. 24: 15; Matt. 11: 28; Rev. 3: 20). Adam and Eve were given the choice to obey or disobey God (Gen. 2: 17; 3: 1-6). The famous "curses" of the Hebrew scriptures were based on the Jew's free moral agency: "But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God...that all these curses shall come upon thee..." (Deut. 28: 15-20, 45). Jesus said to those who were spiritually doomed, "ye would not!" (Matt. 23: 37).

  Man is responsible for his own actions. Since man has the freedom to obey or disobey and God does not overpower the will of man, man is responsible for his own actions. "The soul that sinneth, it shall die," declared the prophet (Ezek. 18: 20). Sin, as such, is not inherited. "The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son." The prophet further states, "...the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him" (Ezek. 18: 20, cf. Matt. 18: 3-6; 19: 13-15).

    In view of the freedom of choice belonging to man, the book of Acts abounds with examples of the sinner being urged to come to God. At the very outset we read, "And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, save yourselves from this untoward generation. Then they that gladly received his word were baptized..." (Acts 2: 40, 41, KJV). Beloved, are you making the right choice?

Man is born with the ability to make moral choices. He can choose to adhere to a set of rules, or not. But nothing I have read indicates any preconditions to free agency; my understanding is that we would therefore be born with more or less an even chance of making choices- we did not pre-exist as Mormons claim, but are created new at birth.


According Gen. 9:20-25, Ham, because he saw Noah naked, was cursed to to be a slave

Quote“Cursed be Canaan!
    The lowest of slaves
    will he be to his brothers.”

So Ham/Canaan is cursed to be slaves. If that is the case and Ham's offspring are cursed of God, then how can they be considered able to exercise free agency? If a man is born into a tribe of aborigines that has never, and will never, learn of Christianity, how can that person make a choice of free agency, moral or otherwise?

If a person is born whole cloth into life with no precondition, how does God determine that person should be the son of Ham or someone else, a built in curse along with it, or no curse?

Genetically we can say that the offspring of Ham came from his loins, but how did God determine that particular set of DNA to appear as an offspring of a cursed man? Is it not then built in that their ability to make choices is limited by the circumstances of their birth, to some degree obviating their free agency?

I'd like to see someone from a Christian forum address this.


I worked with a man that was Mormon and he brought up free agency, I asked him if he had free agency when he has to pee. He got a spaced out look on his face and walked away.
There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action.


Free will, free agency, the power to choose, are contingent on knowing about more than one option. Otherwise, despite the fact that you still took action, cannot be said you truly chose.

QuoteMan is responsible for his own actions
And when we can't find a direct link to choice, because there isn't one (such as abject suffering), then we whip out the get out of jail free card aka original sin.
And the breathtaking idiocy and ridiculous positions this incoherent thought process puts you is a la Ken Ham's latest diatribe about how the whole entire universe was damned by the act of two and how only humankind could attain salvation, and then in the same breath talk about an all-loving absolute benevolent being.

Clear evidence how religion poisons the mind and interferes with critical thought.

Gawdzilla Sama

We 'new atheists' have a reputation for being militant, but make no mistake  we didn't start this war. If you want to place blame put it on the the religious zealots who have been poisoning the minds of the  young for a long long time."
PZ Myers


I thought for damned sure this was about baseball or football and it's about this bogus god..  I'm disappointed..  On the bright side maybe I can sign a million dollar contract to sell my services to Satan..
All hail my new signature!

Admit it. You're secretly green with envy.


Quote from: AllPurposeAtheist on July 29, 2014, 09:27:37 PM
I thought for damned sure this was about baseball or football and it's about this bogus god..  I'm disappointed..  On the bright side maybe I can sign a million dollar contract to sell my services to Satan..

I know, me too. But I'm currently watching a baseball game, so...

Mad cow's not just for cows, or the mad!