Started by randomvim, September 11, 2016, 03:14:56 AM
Quote from: randomvim on September 16, 2016, 06:38:31 PMSome atheists don't know the Bible as well as they think they do. Same may be said for clergy and practicing religious. this is why it should be studied with an open mind.
Quote from: Johan on September 16, 2016, 07:21:21 PMSo you've decided to leave deuteronomy off your biblical buffet plate then?
Quote from: Johan on September 16, 2016, 07:29:24 PMEither you don't understand what the term open mind means or you don't understand atheists.
Quote from: doorknob on September 16, 2016, 08:45:15 PM"you don't have to be so open minded that your brains fall out"
Quote from: doorknob on September 16, 2016, 08:52:53 PMactually I was very open minded while reading the bible and I still determined it to be bull shit. The bible has a lot of very juvenile and shallow teachings. As you would expect to see from its time period. Nothing special or inspirational there sorry. And I was raised catholic so don't tell me about not knowing what's in the bible. I even had bible study. I still was able to see through it. It's a bunch of garbage that needs to die. Religion is like a weapon. Yes it can be used for good but often for evil.
Quote from: Sal1981 on September 16, 2016, 06:07:23 PMYes.Sendt fra min SM-G920F med Tapatalk
Quote from: randomvim on September 16, 2016, 08:57:36 PMThen what is my Bible?
Quote from: randomvim on September 16, 2016, 08:52:12 PMNo. Deuto is present and well. I remember the taking of hands was for thieves and no passages described a woman as having sinned when she is attacked. Instead the attacker would have been killed. But many of these laws were man's law.T here is more than Just God in the Bible - or so this is how some Christians describe the Bible.
QuoteIf two men fight together, and the wife of one draws near to rescue her husband from the hand of the one attacking him, and puts out her hand and seizes him by the genitals, then you shall cut off her hand; your eye shall not pity her.
Quote from: Johan on September 17, 2016, 10:04:03 AMRead what I wrote. No one said anything about the woman being attacked. It was her husband that was being attacked. Or possibly it was her husband that was attacking another. The passage doesn't really make it clear who started it. Apparently it doesn't matter who started it. If the wife of one man steps in to help her husband and touches the other man's wedding tackle, you must cut off her hand and show her no pity. Seems pretty straight forward to me what god is telling us to do in this particular situation. And yeah, call me crazy but it seems pretty immoral to me.