Obama sends lesbian farmers to invade rural conservative America

Started by Hydra009, August 26, 2016, 02:49:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

FaithIsFilth

Quote from: DeltaEpsilon on August 27, 2016, 12:13:04 PM
You idiot! Yes they do have a right to exist. People have the right to express their opinion and not be censored.
Not for much longer. Oh, and idiot? Stop being an ableist asshole. I find that term to be very offensive. You are only helping the case for censorship. Words hurt.

Gawdzilla Sama

Quote from: FaithIsFilth on August 27, 2016, 01:29:51 PM
Not for much longer. Oh, and idiot? Stop being an ableist asshole. I find that term to be very offensive. You are only helping the case for censorship. Words hurt.
So does William.
We 'new atheists' have a reputation for being militant, but make no mistake  we didn't start this war. If you want to place blame put it on the the religious zealots who have been poisoning the minds of the  young for a long long time."
PZ Myers

DeltaEpsilon

Quote from: Shiranu on August 27, 2016, 01:10:20 PM
I frankly would not be opposed to the censorship of tabloids. They can still say what they want... just make sure they have an advisory warning that they are not based on any factuality and not be allowed to be sold with legitimate news sources but rather in a tabloid section/channel.

It's all fine and dandy to say "But...but... free speech!"... but when "free speech" is allowed to dictate how millions upon millions of people hate their neighbour then frankly... fuck free speech.


Propaganda without even a single shred of truth should not be socially accepted.

People should be more logical and it should be standard to provide resources to one's claims. Freedom of speech is very important and I regard freedom of speech very highly. If you take it away then who decides what should be censored.
The fireworks in my head don't ever seem to stop

DeltaEpsilon

Quote from: FaithIsFilth on August 27, 2016, 01:29:51 PM
Not for much longer. Oh, and idiot? Stop being an ableist asshole. I find that term to be very offensive. You are only helping the case for censorship. Words hurt.

I'm sorry, one of your views are idiotic. What do you mean I'm helping the case for censorship? Speak your mind, but expect ridicule from those with different opinions.

I think that, instead of playing the victim card, you should defend your own beliefs. How about that?
The fireworks in my head don't ever seem to stop

Baruch

Quote from: Shiranu on August 27, 2016, 01:10:20 PM
I frankly would not be opposed to the censorship of tabloids. They can still say what they want... just make sure they have an advisory warning that they are not based on any factuality and not be allowed to be sold with legitimate news sources but rather in a tabloid section/channel.

It's all fine and dandy to say "But...but... free speech!"... but when "free speech" is allowed to dictate how millions upon millions of people hate their neighbour then frankly... fuck free speech.


Propaganda without even a single shred of truth should not be socially accepted.

May the Bat Boy bite your &*( off!  It is all tabloids, for political purposes.  Without daytime soap operas, the feminoids would have taken over by now, turned us men into inflatable sex dolls ;-)
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

Shiranu

Tabloid was not the word I was looking for. More accurately, "news" sites should have to be advertised as commentary and op-ed rather than legitimate news. And those sites that continuously post objectively provable misinformation should have to bear a second label declaring that they cannot be trusted on subject x, y, z or whatever.

Very little need for, "who gets to decide". If you report just what happened, you are news. If you report your opinion on it, you are commentary. If you chronically lie, you are known as such. No more bullshit of Breibarts, FOXs, to an extent The Young Turks, etc. etc. being able to advertise themselves as "news" sites (though to be fair, afaik TYT at least puts out disclaimers after the actual article saying, "This is our opinion") when they spread misinformation.
"A little science distances you from God, but a lot of science brings you nearer to Him." - Louis Pasteur

Nonsensei

Quote from: drunkenshoe on August 27, 2016, 06:51:59 AM
I am visting this thread for the second time and I have no idea what is going on. 

There's nothing to understand really. The entire thing is utter bullshit.
And on the wings of a dream so far beyond reality
All alone in desperation now the time has come
Lost inside you'll never find, lost within my own mind
Day after day this misery must go on

SGOS

Quote from: Hydra009 on August 26, 2016, 02:49:14 PM
http://www.snopes.com/limbaugh-obama-sending-lesbian-farmers/

Liberals use propaganda too, but the right wing propaganda so often gets weird, surrealistic, or absurd, sometimes even borderline comical, almost to the extent that it can appear to a normal person like something that was reported by the Onion.  Sometimes, but I will admit not very often, I even hear some of my neighbors pickup on this kind of shit and get bent over it.  Sure I expect this stuff from Rush Limbaugh and Sara Palin, but not my neighbors who are for the most part reasonably intelligent and easy going.

drunkenshoe

OK. after Gawdzilla's response to me, I thought hmm who is this Alex Jones.

Oh gawd and LOOOOL.

Forget his 9/11 truther tirades â€" Here are 7 of Alex Jones’ most unhinged conspiracy theories

QuoteWhile many Americans will spend Sept. 11 remembering the people killed in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, others will presumably take the occasion to revisit their preferred conspiracy theories regarding them.

But rather than do so here, it seemed like a good moment to focus instead on radio host Alex Jones â€" who is arguably the most prominent proponent of the argument that the attack was an “inside job.” Not because of his insulting remarks toward women, or his dating site for fellow “freedom lovers,” or his worries that immigrants will eventually enslave his fellow Americans, but because of his own contributions to the conspiracy theory “field.”

That is, unless he’s a false flag himself.

But here are some Jones theories that particularly stand out:

1. Taylor Swift loves bacteria poop

When the pop and country star announced two years ago that she would be endorsing Diet Coke, Jones quickly asked her to reconsider, saying it was not worth her soul to hawk a drink that was the byproduct of a Pentagon study meant to engineer e-coli bacteria.


“In essence, Taylor Swift is telling us, she loves genetically-modified bacteria poop,” Jones fretted.

2. Harry Reid was behind the ‘false flag’ fatal shooting of Las Vegas cops

Of the several shootings that he has declared “false flags,” the deaths of Officers Igor Soldo and Alyn Beck last June might have hit closer to home for Jones, considering that the shooters, Jerad and Amanda Miller, were apparently fans of his.

Jerad Miller posted on Jones’ website, InfoWars, describing himself as “a wild coyote” and vowing to die rather than be arrested. Amanda Miller would follow her husband’s wishes, shooting first him and then herself following a shootout with authorities after killing the two officers.

On his show, Jones blamed CIA “cutouts” sent by the government for the shootings, arguing that it was staged by Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) in response to the standoff instigated by rancher Cliven Bundy against federal authorities.


“Harry Reid comes out and says we’re going to do something about this, these are domestic terrorists at the Bundy ranch, everybody needs to be arrested,” Jones said at the time. “I told you they’ve been building this behind the scenes, now they’re rolling it out.”


3. Atheists aren’t really atheists â€" they’re “occultists”

In 2012, Jones argued that his study of groups funding atheists revealed that they are actually run by “occultists.” Atheists, in turn, are led to believe that “humans are parasites.” And furthermore, they are actually Satanists.

“We’ve got a lot of atheists and agnostics listening. Even if they don’t believe in God, the point is, as a scientific historical fact, the elites do â€" and they believe in Satan and destruction and blood,” he argued.

A montage of some of his remarks on the matter can be seen below:

4. Same-sex marriage is a eugenics plot

Jones, who identifies himself as a libertarian, has argued at times that he is not against marriage equality because of those principles. But as the Southern Poverty Law Center noted, he has also insisted that there is a sinister purpose behind promoting it as a civil right.

“Clearly, from the eugenicist/globalist view â€" and they’ve written textbooks on it, you can look them up â€" they want to encourage the breakdown of the family, because the family is where people owe their allegiance,” he told a Catholic blog in 2013. “That’s why they want to get rid of God. Not because they’re atheists, but because they want the state to be God.”

5. The government is creating gay people

Speaking of gay people, the government apparently doesn’t just want them getting married in order to reduce the population; Jones argued in 2010 that the government itself is manufacturing the gay people.

“I have the government documents where they said they’re going to encourage homosexuality so people don’t have children,” he boasted. The key, he said, was an estrogen-mimicking material hidden in juice boxes.


“After you’re done drinking your little juices, well, I mean, you’re ready to go out and have a baby,” Jones said
after cutting open a juice box on the air. “You’re ready to put makeup on. You’re ready to wear a short skirt. You’re ready to go, you know, put together a, you know, garden of roses or something. You’re ready to put lipstick on.”


6. Fear the weather wizards

Jones expanded his range in the wake of the fatal tornado that hit Moore, Oklahoma in May 2013, telling a caller, “Of course there’s weather stuff going on.”

He also claimed that the Air Force was the actual cause of a reported tornado in Texas that killed “thirty-something people in one night,” though he did not outright blame the government for the twister in Moore, saying the key was whether people would report spotting helicopters and small aircraft “spraying things” in the clouds.

“If you saw that, you better bet your bottom dollar they did this, but who knows if they did,” he said. “You know, that’s the thing, we don’t know.”

BONUS: “Alex Jones” is actually Bill Hicks

OK, this theory isn’t by Jones, but it’s about him. And as Texas Monthly reported last November, it threatens to blow the whole lid off of Jones’ public persona if true. (It is not true.)

The theory, according to a 33-minute “expose” posted online, goes that the person known publicly as Alex Jones is actually a secret identity given to comedian Bill Hicks by the CIA. Hicks’ death in 1994 was actually â€" you guessed it â€" a false flag in this scenario.


As proof, the filmmakers post pictures of Hicks and Jones side-by-side, arguing that the “distinct characteristics of the two top central incisors, the bottom right cuspid and the bottom right incisor” make it obvious that the two are the same person. A photo from the video can be seen below:

jones and hicks

The whole video, which purports to contain “irrefutable evidence” as to “Jones'” true identity, can be seen here.
"science is not about building a body of known 'facts'. ıt is a method for asking awkward questions and subjecting them to a reality-check, thus avoiding the human tendency to believe whatever makes us feel good." - tp

Gawdzilla Sama

We 'new atheists' have a reputation for being militant, but make no mistake  we didn't start this war. If you want to place blame put it on the the religious zealots who have been poisoning the minds of the  young for a long long time."
PZ Myers

FaithIsFilth

Alex Jones is a comedian. Don't take him seriously. Sometimes he will even admit that he was just being silly before and joking around, and then he'll go right back into kayfabe and act like he completely believes what he is saying. Take Michelle Obama being trans for example. First Jones was sure that she was a man. Then he admitted he was only joking. Now he's back with the "I truly do believe Michelle Obama is a man" gimmick. When I see someone taking Jones seriously, that tells me that that person has not done their homework (not that I blame you. It's a lot of silly shit to sit through and watch), but when mainstream media acts like he is a serious person, they are just trying to pull the wool over your eyes and make people who question the government's BS look like shit. Mainstream media knows very well that Jones is not a serious person, but they try to play it off like he is.

Shiranu

Doesn't really matter if Jones is serious or not, what matters is that he presents himself as legitimate news and way too many people believe him.
"A little science distances you from God, but a lot of science brings you nearer to Him." - Louis Pasteur

Gawdzilla Sama

Quote from: Shiranu on August 28, 2016, 09:32:17 AM
Doesn't really matter if Jones is serious or not, what matters is that he presents himself as legitimate news and way too many people believe him.
He's a god over at abovetopsecret.com.









Yeah, your world just got weirder AGAIN.
We 'new atheists' have a reputation for being militant, but make no mistake  we didn't start this war. If you want to place blame put it on the the religious zealots who have been poisoning the minds of the  young for a long long time."
PZ Myers

FaithIsFilth

Quote from: DeltaEpsilon on August 27, 2016, 01:44:11 PM
I'm sorry, one of your views are idiotic.
Don't apologise. Tell me to shove it up my ass. I was doing a parody of a social justice warrior and trying to sound as ridiculous as possible. In reality, I dislike the language police probably more than anyone here. I'm even cool with the use of the words nigger (no, using this word is not racist), faggot (no, using this word is not homophobic), whore, slut, etc. Have at it. I don't have a problem with the use of the word idiot either, but I do think people are hypocrites when they say I shouldn't use the word nigger or fag, yet they can use idiot, stupid, blind, etc. Stupid and blind as insults are making light of the situation handicapped people find themselves in. Nigger to me pretty much just means "dude", and faggot has nothing whatsoever to do with homosexuality when I use it (of course it can be homophobic, but not unless it's meant in that way). Faggot to me just means "lame". Some might ask "how am I supposed to know you're not being homophobic?" Well, when homophobes use fag as an insult, they usually make it pretty clear that they mean to be homophobic. If someone sees a post of mine with that word in it and takes offense, that's their problem (I probably have the gayest avatar on here, well, next to Munch's that is, so there should be no reason for anyone to think I'm meaning to be homophobic). Why don't I use the word "lame" in it's place? Well, I don't see lame as being any less offensive than fag, so I'll use the word once in a blue moon just to show that I don't think the word should be considered off limits. Now, does that mean that it's cool to go up to a random person and call them fag or nigger. No, of course not, but that's an entirely different conversation. There's a time and a place to use these words, and obviously you don't just go up to a random black guy and call him nigger.

Hydra009