IG Promotional Podcast

or visit this rss feed.


FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MemberlistMemberlist    UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister   
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 ChatChat Room   The Infidel Guy's Video RoomFreethought Videos
BlogsBlogs    My BlogWeblogs News

LIVE AUDIO STREAM AND CHAT
LIVE show, 8PM ET Thursdays!
Call toll free: 888-503-0802

~ Visit Our NEW IRC ChatRoom ~


Thermonuclear fusion Vs Gravitational binding

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> Physics & Cosmology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
josephpalazzo
Illusion Master


Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 11199
Local time: 5:21 PM
Location: Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:00 am    Post subject: Thermonuclear fusion Vs Gravitational binding Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

At the heart of the sun, hydrogen is burning to make helium:

4 hydrogen → He + 27 MeV of released energy

But this is only a fraction of the rest mass involved.

Released energy/rest energy = 27MeV/(4x938MeV = 1 %

Now in forming a black hole due the gravitational binding, that is bringing a particle from infinity to a stable bound orbit around a black hole gives the following:

Released energy/rest energy = 1 – (1-2M/r) ÷SQR(1-3M/r)

At r = 6M (for stable circular orbit), this yields 6%, or six times the thermonuclear fusion. For rotating black hole, the yield can be as high as 42%, making the most energetic phenomena in nature. What has been observed recently, New class of black hole could explain cosmic leviathans might shed light on this phenomenon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
mknayman
Highly Evolved and Loving It!


Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 950
Local time: 4:21 PM
Location: Toronto
ca.gif

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:03 am    Post subject: Re: Thermonuclear fusion Vs Gravitational binding Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

josephpalazzo wrote:
At the heart of the sun, hydrogen is burning to make helium:

4 hydrogen → He + 27 MeV of released energy

But this is only a fraction of the rest mass involved.

Released energy/rest energy = 27MeV/(4x938MeV = 1 %

Now in forming a black hole due the gravitational binding, that is bringing a particle from infinity to a stable bound orbit around a black hole gives the following:

Released energy/rest energy = 1 – (1-2M/r) ÷SQR(1-3M/r)

At r = 6M (for stable circular orbit), this yields 6%, or six times the thermonuclear fusion. For rotating black hole, the yield can be as high as 42%, making the most energetic phenomena in nature. What has been observed recently, New class of black hole could explain cosmic leviathans might shed light on this phenomenon.


Prove it.
_________________
"And Yet It Moves..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Confesionalian
Banned


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 940
Local time: 4:21 PM

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:04 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I was hoping for "Hypermassive" Black Holes to be the next class.

Not "intermediate"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
josephpalazzo
Illusion Master


Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 11199
Local time: 5:21 PM
Location: Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:51 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

"Intermediate" is good as it could be a stepping stone to "hypermassive". Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
josephpalazzo
Illusion Master


Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 11199
Local time: 5:21 PM
Location: Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Thermonuclear fusion Vs Gravitational binding Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

mknayman wrote:
josephpalazzo wrote:
At the heart of the sun, hydrogen is burning to make helium:

4 hydrogen → He + 27 MeV of released energy

But this is only a fraction of the rest mass involved.

Released energy/rest energy = 27MeV/(4x938MeV = 1 %

Now in forming a black hole due the gravitational binding, that is bringing a particle from infinity to a stable bound orbit around a black hole gives the following:

Released energy/rest energy = 1 – (1-2M/r) ÷SQR(1-3M/r)

At r = 6M (for stable circular orbit), this yields 6%, or six times the thermonuclear fusion. For rotating black hole, the yield can be as high as 42%, making the most energetic phenomena in nature. What has been observed recently, New class of black hole could explain cosmic leviathans might shed light on this phenomenon.


Prove it.


I would but only if you have taken courses in advanced calculus, differential geometry, general relativity and quantum mechanics. Otherwise, see you in 4? 5? years... Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
Confesionalian
Banned


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 940
Local time: 4:21 PM

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:46 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

josephpalazzo wrote:
"Intermediate" is good as it could be a stepping stone to "hypermassive". Wink


Yeah, but that stepping stone goes right through a supermassive black hole. I'm sure that event horizon is pretty, but the flaming vortex of various gases and immense gravitational pressure does not sound a pleasant thing to go through.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
josephpalazzo
Illusion Master


Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 11199
Local time: 5:21 PM
Location: Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:22 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Confessionalian wrote:
josephpalazzo wrote:
"Intermediate" is good as it could be a stepping stone to "hypermassive". Wink


Yeah, but that stepping stone goes right through a supermassive black hole. I'm sure that event horizon is pretty, but the flaming vortex of various gases and immense gravitational pressure does not sound a pleasant thing to go through.


Those are believed to be a consequence of galaxy mergers, and we don't know if this will happen to our galaxy in the very near future. Because we don't know Andromeda's side velocity, it could collide with our Milky Way in 3, 5 or even 10 billion years. I'm not going to wait that long... Eh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
Confesionalian
Banned


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 940
Local time: 4:21 PM

PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:37 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

josephpalazzo wrote:
Confessionalian wrote:
josephpalazzo wrote:
"Intermediate" is good as it could be a stepping stone to "hypermassive". Wink


Yeah, but that stepping stone goes right through a supermassive black hole. I'm sure that event horizon is pretty, but the flaming vortex of various gases and immense gravitational pressure does not sound a pleasant thing to go through.


Those are believed to be a consequence of galaxy mergers, and we don't know if this will happen to our galaxy in the very near future. Because we don't know Andromeda's side velocity, it could collide with our Milky Way in 3, 5 or even 10 billion years. I'm not going to wait that long... Eh?


Well, hopefully, the Earth won't get ejected out of the new galaxy upon collision...or land near any pulsars because of the galactic upheaval and resulting drift. Having the atmosphere ripped asunder and the surface turn molten or being without a source of heat is kinda up there with being blackhole'd.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kniva
Forum Leader
Forum Leader


Joined: 18 May 2009
Posts: 1592
Local time: 10:21 PM

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:03 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Confessionalian wrote:
josephpalazzo wrote:
"Intermediate" is good as it could be a stepping stone to "hypermassive". Wink


Yeah, but that stepping stone goes right through a supermassive black hole. I'm sure that event horizon is pretty, but the flaming vortex of various gases and immense gravitational pressure does not sound a pleasant thing to go through.


The shear forces at the event horizon of a black hole depend on it's radius. In case of a supermassive BH, the "surface" would be so large, that the inertia effect would be far from lethal to human beings. The EH actually isn't the actual surface of the object "Black Hole", the mass of the BH is concentrated in its center. Any object that passes the EH will inevitably fall into it's center and then transfom into radiation captured within the center (the singularity).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Confesionalian
Banned


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 940
Local time: 4:21 PM

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:21 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Kniva wrote:
Confessionalian wrote:
josephpalazzo wrote:
"Intermediate" is good as it could be a stepping stone to "hypermassive". Wink


Yeah, but that stepping stone goes right through a supermassive black hole. I'm sure that event horizon is pretty, but the flaming vortex of various gases and immense gravitational pressure does not sound a pleasant thing to go through.


The shear forces at the event horizon of a black hole depend on it's radius. In case of a supermassive BH, the "surface" would be so large, that the inertia effect would be far from lethal to human beings. The EH actually isn't the actual surface of the object "Black Hole", the mass of the BH is concentrated in its center. Any object that passes the EH will inevitably fall into it's center and then transfom into radiation captured within the center (the singularity).


I'm aware. Because of the sheer size of a supermassive blackhole one could leisurely drift past the event horizon and remain alive for a few hours before tidal forces teach you a lesson in matter elongation. Conversely, a stellar-mass black hole would be more instant.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kniva
Forum Leader
Forum Leader


Joined: 18 May 2009
Posts: 1592
Local time: 10:21 PM

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:24 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Yes, the leathal forces would appear during the fall into the center. BTW, the question when an object actually passes the EH is not a simple one (it's also subject to the relativity of reference systems).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Confesionalian
Banned


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 940
Local time: 4:21 PM

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:34 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Kniva wrote:
Yes, the leathal forces would appear during the fall into the center. BTW, when an object actually passes the Eh is not a simple question (it's also subject to reference systems).


Of course. However, you could also could also lengthen your final descent into the gravity pit by tampering with acceleration of the spacecraft you should be in. And that fixture of time you win before your unavoidable fate would depend on the level of technology you possess and your fuel source. I don't think we'll have the ability to physically stumble upon any black holes for a few hundred years so we should have pocket sized fusion reactors by then. So hey, a couple of weeks before your ripped asunder. Great vacation for the kids.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kniva
Forum Leader
Forum Leader


Joined: 18 May 2009
Posts: 1592
Local time: 10:21 PM

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:38 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I doubt it would be worth to die for this experience as (in theory) there are some causality issues within the sphere formed by the EH that would probably prevent one from seeing anything.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Confesionalian
Banned


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 940
Local time: 4:21 PM

PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:40 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Unless you want a spectacular suicide. They could tell all their dead friends as St. Peter tries to put his/her atoms back together.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> Physics & Cosmology All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Breast Enlargement - Debt Management - Debt Management - Gold Chains - Cheap Home Insurance
phpBB SEO