| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Philosophos The owls are not what they seem

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 8816 Local time: 6:51 AM Location: The Black Lodge
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's natural rights theory?
| Gettin' In Tune wrote: | | Drivel. Pure drivel. |
Very good. Thanks for conceding. _________________ To get rid of this God-awful feeling... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Gettin' In Tune Forum Master


Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 2167 Local time: 5:51 AM
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Philosophos wrote: | | What's natural rights theory? |
Are you fucking retarded? You have the right to own yourself and your faculties regardless of any government.
| Quote: | | Very good. Thanks for conceding. |
Your drivel does not equal a concession from me. No wonder you struggle with logic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philosophos The owls are not what they seem

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 8816 Local time: 6:51 AM Location: The Black Lodge
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gettin' In Tune wrote: | | drivel does not equal a concession from me. |
Maybe not. But it is kinda funny to watch you attempt to think!
I mixed my labor with this thread. Therefore it's mine. So GTFO. _________________ To get rid of this God-awful feeling... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gettin' In Tune Forum Master


Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 2167 Local time: 5:51 AM
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Philosophos wrote: | | Maybe not. But it is kinda funny to watch you attempt to think! |
It's cute to watch you squirm and get huffy.
| Quote: | | I mixed my labor with this thread. Therefore it's mine. So GTFO. |
You don't own this thread, nor the thoughts. All you own is your fucktarded drivel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philosophos The owls are not what they seem

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 8816 Local time: 6:51 AM Location: The Black Lodge
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gettin' In Tune wrote: | | It's cute to watch you squirm and get huffy. |
Does it make you hard?
| Quote: | | You don't own this thread, nor the thoughts. |
You've actually been thinking in this thread?  _________________ To get rid of this God-awful feeling... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gnosis Forum Leader


Joined: 27 Feb 2008 Posts: 1545 Local time: 5:51 AM Location: California

|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Knight_of_BAAWA wrote: | | Certain things you can transmit, but you can't transfer the ownership thereof. For instance: you can tell someone something and give them that thought, but you can't literally transfer the thought you have to somone else such that you will never have it. |
That's why thoughts cannot be "owned". _________________ "The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost invariably, he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally, he is apt to spread discontent among those who are." -H.L. Mencken |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philosophos The owls are not what they seem

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 8816 Local time: 6:51 AM Location: The Black Lodge
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gnosis wrote: | | Knight_of_BAAWA wrote: | | Certain things you can transmit, but you can't transfer the ownership thereof. For instance: you can tell someone something and give them that thought, but you can't literally transfer the thought you have to somone else such that you will never have it. |
That's why thoughts cannot be "owned". |
An-caps are against things like copyright precisely because of this, though. _________________ To get rid of this God-awful feeling... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Knight_of_BAAWA Jedi Slackmaster

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 8882 Local time: 5:51 AM Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Knight_of_BAAWA wrote: | | Certain things you can transmit, but you can't transfer the ownership thereof. For instance: you can tell someone something and give them that thought, but you can't literally transfer the thought you have to somone else such that you will never have it. |
| gnosis wrote: | | That's why thoughts cannot be "owned". |
Non sequitur. _________________ aa #51, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philosophos The owls are not what they seem

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 8816 Local time: 6:51 AM Location: The Black Lodge
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is my proposition above on the right track, Knight? _________________ To get rid of this God-awful feeling... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hit_me_up024 Forum Leader


Joined: 25 Dec 2007 Posts: 1683 Local time: 5:51 AM Location: repen the 540

|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the president doesnt have to pay for gas, electricity, food, or water nothing at all for as long as they are president. _________________ Im Like a flie to the NEON lights, a good BUZZ is the only thing i need
Props to Enemy_of_Reality |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Knight_of_BAAWA Jedi Slackmaster

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 8882 Local time: 5:51 AM Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Philosophos wrote: | | Is my proposition above on the right track, Knight? |
Yes, although thoughts are "owned" in the sense that they exist in each individuals head and do not have to be communicated unless the person wants to.
However, the concept that you are further talking about is why IP is bullshit: you can't own an "idea" in the sense of "the idea in the book". You can own the physicality of the book and sell it, but saying that the idea is also still "owned" by the writer and thus "stolen" if someone copies the book is bullshit, since you can't physically remove the idea from the writer's head! _________________ aa #51, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gnosis Forum Leader


Joined: 27 Feb 2008 Posts: 1545 Local time: 5:51 AM Location: California

|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Knight_of_BAAWA wrote: |
Yes, although thoughts are "owned" in the sense that they exist in each individuals head and do not have to be communicated unless the person wants to.
However, the concept that you are further talking about is why IP is bullshit: you can't own an "idea" in the sense of "the idea in the book". You can own the physicality of the book and sell it, but saying that the idea is also still "owned" by the writer and thus "stolen" if someone copies the book is bullshit, since you can't physically remove the idea from the writer's head! |
Aren't thoughts "Intellectual Property"? _________________ "The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost invariably, he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally, he is apt to spread discontent among those who are." -H.L. Mencken |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Knight_of_BAAWA Jedi Slackmaster

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Posts: 8882 Local time: 5:51 AM Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not in the sense that they exist in the physical strata called the brain, no. Again: that is the sole means that they are property, and the only way to "steal" a thought then is to physically remove the thought from the person's head. _________________ aa #51, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gettin' In Tune Forum Master


Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 2167 Local time: 5:51 AM
|
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why should my individual governance be decided upon contemporaneous political ideologies? Divine interventionism broke down under monarchy (partially due to the concept of natural rights). Majority rule interventionism is currently breaking down under democracy (partially due to natural rights).
Why should my rights to person, property, and liberty ever be jeopardized by a divinity or majority?
Last edited by Gettin' In Tune on Sat May 17, 2008 8:16 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gettin' In Tune Forum Master


Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 2167 Local time: 5:51 AM
|
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gnosis wrote: | | Aren't thoughts "Intellectual Property"? |
You can lose the modifier "intelligent". Thoughts are your property. Unless you voluntarily share them, they can only be extracted by violence. This is a universal fact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|