The Infidel Guy Show
The Debate Hour Show

Faith and Freethought
3 Podcasts, One Feed

or visit this page.


FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MemberlistMemberlist    UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister   
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 VideoRoom and ChatLive Video and Chat Room   The Infidel Guy's Video RoomFreethought Videos
BlogsBlogs    My BlogWeblogs News


Embed Our Player

~ TIP JAR ~


The Atheist's Obsession With God
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 89, 90, 91 ... 141, 142, 143  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> Enter The Darkness
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Hit_me_up024
Forum Master
Forum Master


Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Posts: 2351
Local time: 3:23 AM
Location: My parents basement.
us.gif

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 1:47 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

nice quotes moloth
_________________
KILL the pancake


Props to Enemy_of_Reality
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Juno22
"Some Chicken—Some Neck!"


Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Posts: 294
Local time: 2:23 AM

ca.gif

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 3:17 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

It's boggles my mind that an adult can possibly believe the Noah's Ark stuff.
_________________
"People who harbor strong convictions without evidence belong at the margins of our societies, not in our halls of power." - Sam Harris
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Moloth
Coin Operated Boy


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23071
Local time: 3:23 AM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
us.gif

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 3:38 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Juno22 wrote:
It's boggles my mind that an adult can possibly believe the Noah's Ark stuff.




_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-

www.Moloth.com

Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Missionary
Guest




Local time: 6:23 PM

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 3:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eyedunno wrote:
Missionary wrote:
Eyedunno wrote:

And yet they didn't die "that very day" in the story - heck, he lived 930 years (Genesis 5:5). This leaves you to talk about nonsense like "spiritual death" to try and save this story from its own inconsistencies.


That was satan's argument:

Genesis 3:4-5 (KJV)
4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

1) Not Satan. It's a serpent, it's never referred to as anything but a serpent, and the Kipling-esque condemnation by God further reinforces the fact that it's a snake.
2) The whole concept of Satan as we know it is a Christian invention. The Satan in Job is one of the sons of God (often thought of as an angel to Christians who get antsy about competition with their Number One Son, even if the original Hebrew says sons of God), and it's clear that he's acting in accord with God and God's plans, even if he doubts Job's virtue. Satan means "accuser" or "adversary" in the original Hebrew, and there's no hint that it's a name, much less a demon's name - it's more likely closer to a title or manner of distinguishing this particular son.


Well, let's take a look at it.

The English word translated as serpent is transliterated from the Hebrew:

Quote:
Hebrew Strong's Number: 5175
Hebrew Word: ‏נָחָשׁ‎
Transliteration: nāḥāsh
Phonetic Pronunciation:naw-khawsh'
Root: from <H5172>
Cross Reference: TWOT - 1347a
Part of Speech: n m
Vine's Words: None
Usage Notes:

English Words used in KJV:
serpent 31
[Total Count: 31]

from <H5172> (nachash); a snake (from its hiss) :- serpent.
— Strong's Talking Greek & Hebrew Dictionary


While it indeed is used to describe a serpent creature it also has other meanings including figurative:
Quote:
1347 ‏נחשׁ‎ (nḥsh) I. Assumed root of the following.
1347a †‏נָחָשׁ‎ (nāḥāsh) <H5175> serpent, snake.
1347b ‏נְחֻשְׁתָּן‎ (neḥūshtān) <H5180> Nehushtan.
nāḥāsh. Serpent, snake. This is the most common word for "snake." It is found thirty times in the OT, distributed from Genesis through the minor prophets. It is also known from the Ugaritic nḥš.
The first five occurrences of nāḥāsh are in Genesis 3 (Genesis 3:1, 2, 4, 13, 14) and of course refer to the creature that tempted Eve to disobey God. Paul alludes to this incident in 2 Cor. 11:3 and John in Rev. 12:9ff. In all instances, including the LXX translation, the Greek word is ophis.
Opinions differ as to whether this was a satan-inspired snake or a name for satan himself (J. O. Buswell, Systematic Theology of the Christian Religion, I, Zondervan, 1962, pp. 264-65). Only naturalistic theology could hold that it was a mere snake referred to in myth or legend.
nāḥāsh occurs in Exodus 4:3; Exodus 7:15, in connection with Moses' rod turning to a "serpent. During the wilderness wanderings of the Israelites the Lord sent fiery serpents." Numbers 21:6, 7, 9; Deut. 8:15, and 2 Kings 18:4 refer both to the plague and the bronze "serpent" neḥūshtān which Moses made. Normally the "serpent" is something evil. But anyone poisoned with venom could, by looking at the bronze "serpent," be healed. Jesus alluded to this episode in John 3:14. As the object of faith resembled the curse in the case of the "snakes," so Jesus resembled the cursed in that he took the form of a servant and was made in the likeness of man (Phil. 2:7). There are at least two more noteworthy features of this account of Moses' bronze "snake." First, the word nāḥāsh is almost identical to the word for bronze" or "copper," Hebrew neḥōshet (q.v.). Some scholars think the words are related because of a common color of snakes (cf. our "copperhead"), but others think that they are only coincidentally similar. From 2 Kings 18:4 we can assume that the bronze "serpent" became a relic a religious fetish, and that the people of God acting like ordinary men, wanted to worship it. The name given it was "Nehushtan," which may refer to the words nāḥāsh (snake) and/or neḥōshet (brass).
Both Jeremiah and Amos may be alluding to this desert incident when they threaten punishment in the form of "serpents" (Jeremiah 8:17; Amos 5:19; Amos 9:3). Isaiah and Micah may have Genesis 3:14 in mind when they speak of licking the dust like a "serpent" (Isaiah 65:25; Micah 7:17).
Both Job and Isaiah mention the leviathan (q.v.) or dragon or crooked "serpent" in connection with God's power (Job 26:13; Isaiah 27:1).
Other characteristics of "snakes" receive mention. Genesis 49:17 seems to refer to a serpent's stealth; Psalm 58:4; Psalm 140:3 [H 4]; Proverbs 23:32 Eccles. 10:8, 11, Jeremiah 8:17; Amos 5:19; and Amos 9:3 to the poisonous bite; Proverbs 30:19 to their climbing ability on a smooth surface; and Jeremiah 46:22 to the hissing sound they make.
Three passages (Psalm 54:4-5; Eccles. 10:11; Jeremiah 8:17) may refer to "snake" charming. Again, the word nāḥāsh is similar to the word laḥash (enchantment or divination) in those passages (cf. nāḥash).
Three or four people and one city have names derived from this root: Nahash, the king of Ammon (1 Samuel 11:1, et al.); Nahash, the father of Abigail and Zeruiah (2 Samuel 17:25); Nahshon, the son of Aminadab and brother-in-law of Aaron (Exodus 6:23 et al.); Nehushta, the mother of king Jehoiakin (2 Kings 24:Cool; and the city of Nahash (Ir-nahash in most translations, 1 Chron. 4:12). Since there are several identical roots, these names may not necessarily mean "snake" but perhaps "diviner" (naḥash) or "copper" (neḥōshet).
Bibliography: TDNT, V, pp. 571-79.
— Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament


Here the word serpent is used figuratively such as in Genesis 3, Genesis 49, Isaiah 14
Quote:
Genesis 49:16-17 (KJV)
16 Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel.
17 Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that biteth the horse heels, so that his rider shall fall backward.

Isaiah 14:28-29 (KJV)
28 In the year that king Ahaz died was this burden.
29 Rejoice not thou, whole Palestina, because the rod of him that smote thee is broken: for out of the serpent's root shall come forth a cockatrice, and his fruit shall be a fiery flying serpent.

Jeremiah 46 refers directly to this figurative speech as having a voice:

Jeremiah 46:22 (KJV)
22 The voice thereof shall go like a serpent; for they shall march with an army, and come against her with axes, as hewers of wood.


Notice the root word in Hebrew:
Quote:
Hebrew Strong's Number: 5172
Hebrew Word: ‏נָחַשׁ‎
Transliteration: nāḥash
Phonetic Pronunciation:naw-khash'
Root: a primitive root
Cross Reference: TWOT - 1348
Part of Speech: v
Vine's Words: None
Usage Notes:

English Words used in KJV:
enchantment 4
divine 2
enchanter 1
indeed 1
certainly 1
learn by experience 1
diligently observe 1
[Total Count: 11]

a primitive root; properly to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; generally to prognosticate :- × certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) × enchantment, learn by experience, × indeed, diligently observe.
— Strong's Talking Greek & Hebrew Dictionary


Notice that this root word is used in reference to divination, omen, enchanters, and sorcery:
Quote:
1348 ‏נָחַשׁ‎ (nāḥash) <H5172> II, learn by experience, diligently observe, divine, practice divination or fortunetelling, take as an omen.
Derivative
1348a †‏נַחַשׁ‎ (naḥash) <H5173> divination.
The verb nāḥash is found only in the intensive stem (Piel) and is definitely related to the noun naḥash meaning "divination" or "enchantment."
The first occurrence of nāḥash is in Genesis 30:27, where Laban "learned from the omens" (JB) that Jacob's presence meant his blessing.
Both in Genesis 44:5, 15 the doubly intensive form (infinitive absolute plus finite verb) occurs. There we learn that Joseph claimed for his brothers' benefit that he could "divine" with a special cup and so knew secret things such as that his brothers, still unaware of who he was, had his cup in their possession. According to 1 Kings 20:33, the servants of Benhadad "took as an omen" Ahab's use of the word "brother" in reference to their king.
But divination is outlawed in Leviticus 19:26 and is spoken of with condemnation in 2 Kings 17:17 and 2 Kings 21:6 (cf. 2 Chron. 33:6). It is in the list of forbidden occult practices of Deut. 18:10.
naḥash. Divination, enchantment, omen, sorcery (Berkeley Version) augury (JPS). The noun naḥash is obviously related to the cognate verb nāḥash II. Numbers 23:23 has the word in the singular, parallel to qesem (q.v.), indicating some variety of the occult. Numbers 24:1, also part of the Balaam passages, has the only other occurrence of naḥash. Because of the similarity of naḥash to nāḥāsh (q.v.) meaning "snake," some make a connection to snakecharming. More contend that there is a similarity of hissing sounds between enchanters and serpents and hence the similarity of words.
Bibliography: Liefeld, W. L., "Divination," in ZPEB, II, pp. 146-49. Summers, Montague, The History of Witchcraft and Demonology, New York: University Books, 1956.
— Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament


Satan is a transliterated word to English.

The Hebrew:
Quote:
Hebrew Strong's Number: 7854
Hebrew Word: ‏שָׂטָן‎
Transliteration: śāṭān
Phonetic Pronunciation:saw-tawn'
Root: from <H7853>, Greek <G4566>
Cross Reference: TWOT - 2252a
Part of Speech: n m
Vine's Words: Satan
Usage Notes:
English Words used in KJV:
Satan 19
adversary 7
withstand 1
[Total Count: 27]

from <H7853> (satan); an opponent; especially (with the article prefixed) Satan, the arch-enemy of good :- adversary, Satan, withstand.
— Strong's Talking Greek & Hebrew Dictionary


The Root Word:
Quote:
Hebrew Word: ‏שָׂטַן‎
Transliteration: śāṭan
Phonetic Pronunciation:saw-tan'
Root: a primitive root
Cross Reference: TWOT - 2252
Part of Speech: v
Vine's Words: None
Usage Notes:
English Words used in KJV:
adversary 5
resist 1
[Total Count: 6]

a primitive root; to attack, (figurative) accuse :- (be an) adversary, resist.
— Strong's Talking Greek & Hebrew Dictionary


The Cross Reference to Theological Wordbook Of The Old Testament for the root.
Quote:
2252 ‏שָׂטַן‎ (śaṭan) <H7853> be an adversary, resist. ASV consistently renders the former, while RSV translates "accuse." Denominative verb.
Parent Noun
2252a ‏שָׂטָן‎ (śāṭān) <H7854> adversary, one who withstands.
2252b ‏שִׂטְנָה‎ (śiṭnâ) <H7855> enmity, accusation.
The verb śāṭan occurs six times in the OT often in participial forms for one who bears a grudge or cherishes animosity.
David employed this verb to describe his adversaries (Psalm 38:20; Psalm 109:4) who were rendering him evil for good. He prayed for their overthrow (Psalm 109:20, 29; cf. Psalm 71:13). It also represents in the noun form (Satan, KJV, NASB, NIV) a judicial accusing (Zech. 3:1). Correspondingly the noun śiṭnâ describes a written accusation (Ezra 4:6); it had earlier served as a name, Sitnah, "enmity," for a well over which men quarrelled (Genesis 26:21).
śāṭān. Adversary, one who withstands, Satan. The nominal form śāṭān identifies Solomon's adversaries (1 Kings 11:14, 23, 25; cf. 5:4; 1 Samuel 29:4). David spoke of his vengeful officer Abishai as a śāṭān (2 Samuel 19:22 [H 23]). Indeed, the pre-incarnate Christ, or Angel of Yahweh might be described or even identify himself as a śāṭān, when opposing Balaam (Numbers 22:22, 32).
Throughout history mankind's preeminent opponent has been Satan, "that old serpent" (Rev. 12:9). He is a mighty angel (cf. his appearance with other "sons of God" in Job 1:6; Jude 9). [Whether Satan was also a cherub depends on one's interpretation of Ezekiel 28:12-16. These verses condemn the king of Tyre, but go beyond him by comparing him to a figure of perfection who was in Eden, who was created holy and later fell. The figures of both Adam and Satan have been proposed for the person intended.
Three lines of evidence support the identification of this king with Satan: 1) Ezekiel may have intended to contrast the prince of Tyre (Ezekiel 28:1-10) with the king of Tyre (Ezekiel 28:11-19). Whereas the prince is a man aspiring to deity and heaven, the king is a heavenly being cast out of heaven. 2) The god of Tyre at this time is malkart, meaning "king of the city," so that would be the king of Tyre. 3) The apostle Paul identifies Satan's sin with pride (1 Tim. 3:6), the sin of this king (1 Tim. 3:7). This may be the only passage in the OT from which he could have derived this truth.
Satan may be conceived as addressed through the Tyrian, even as Christ rebuked that evil angel through Peter (Matthew 16:23). Further, if "Eden, the garden of God" (Ezekiel 28:13) refers to a heavenly garden, inhabited by angels (note how the phrases, "mountain of God" and "stones of fire" Ezekiel 28:14 do not well fit the earthly Eden), then it could be Satan who is here addressed as an "anointed cherub" (Ezekiel 28:14) or an overshadowing cherub (cf. mimshaḥ), which is inapplicable to Adam.
On the other hand, if this Eden is the earthly one of Genesis 2-3, and the mountain" and "stones" refer to the pretensions of the pagan king seated in his temple at Tyre, deluded by his commercial success (cf. Ezekiel 28:16), then the monarch's fall could be compared with Adam's. This assumes that ’att (Ezekiel 28:14) be read as ’et "with" (rather than "you". "With an anointed cherub I placed you." kerûb (Ezekiel 28:16) would be read as the subject of the verb repointing wā’abbedkā to we’ibbadkā (3 m.s. perf. for 1 common s. impf.), thus reading "the cherub drove you out," as in RSV (cf. JBL 75:326-27). r.l.h.]
Satan's career exhibits four stages of progressive failure.
(1) Satan fell into condemnation through a pride that induced him to rival God (1 Tim. 3:6 and perhaps Isaiah 14:12-15, if the king of Babylon is there a tool of Satan, something more than "hêlēl (q.v.) son of dawn." The Latin translation, lucifer, refers to the planet Venus, the morning star; see Rev. 9:1). The NT identifies Satan as the tempting power behind Adam's fall (Genesis 3:15 in Romans 16:20). The OT makes no direct reference to this fact (citing "the serpent"), though Satan's own fall may well have occurred with this same temptation (cf. creation's unimpaired goodness in Genesis 1:31). Yet despite his loss of status, the "devil" (Gr. diabolos "slanderer") continued to exercise power on earth and to have access to heaven as haśśāṭān "the accuser" (Job 1:9; Job 2:4; Zech. 3:1), or simply "the spirit" (1 Kings 22:19-22). Only in Ezra's (?) post-exilic composition does śāṭān appear as a proper noun, Satan (1 Chron. 21:1). Negative critics thus restrict haśśāṭān to the role of a "prosecuting attorney" who became evil only under later Persian concepts of dualism (M. Burrows, Outline of Biblical Theology, p. 125). Yet the testimony of the entire OT makes clear his consistent hostility toward God and animosity toward man (Job 1:11; Job 2:3-5).
(2) With the crucifixion and ascension of Christ, Satan was cast from heaven, no more to accuse the brethren (John 12:31; Rev. 12:10), though he is still "the prince of the power of the [terrestrial] air" (Ephes. 2:2). (3) Isaiah predicted a time when Yahweh would punish the satanic hosts, as well as the evil kings of earth, by confining them in prison (Isaiah 24:21-22; cf. Rev. 20:1 on Satan's millennial binding).
(4) Then "after many days they will be punished" (Isaiah 24:22 NASB), words which point to the final judgment and Satan's eternal torment in the lake of fire (Rev. 20:10).
Bibliography: Kluger, Rivkah S., Satan in the OT, Northwestern University, 1967. Payne, J. B., Theology of the Older Testament, Zondervan, 1971, pp. 291-95. Hiebert, D. E., "Satan," in ZPEB, V, pp. 282-86.
— Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament


The New Testament Greek word translated into the English as devil

Quote:
Greek Strong's Number: 1228
Greek Word: διάβολος
Transliteration: diabolos
Phonetic Pronunciation:dee-ab'-ol-os
Root: from <G1225>
Cross Reference: TDNT - 2:72,150
Part of Speech: adj
Vine's Words: Accuser, Devil, Devlish, Slandered
Usage Notes:

English Words used in KJV:
devil 35
false accuser 2
slanderer 1
[Total Count: 38]

from <G1225> (diaballo); a traducer; specially Satan [compare <H7854> (satan)] :- false accuser, devil, slanderer.
— Strong's Talking Greek & Hebrew DictionaryGreek Strong's Number: 1228


And also in the NT Greek; Satan:
Quote:
Greek Strong's Number: 4567
Greek Word: Σατανᾶς
Transliteration: Satanas
Phonetic Pronunciation:sat-an-as'
Root: of Aramaic origin corresponding to <G4566> (with the definite affix)
Cross Reference: TDNT - 7:151,1007
Part of Speech: n pr m
Vine's Words: Satan

Usage Notes:

English Words used in KJV:
Satan 36
[Total Count: 36]

of Chaldee origin corresponding to <G4566> (Satan) (with the definite affix); the accuser, i.e. the devil :- Satan.
— Strong's Talking Greek & Hebrew Dictionary


Which is used in passages such as:
Quote:
2 Corinthians 12:7 (KJV)
7 And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.

In this passage, serpent, devil, and Satan are used together to describe one single person:

Quote:
Revelation 12:8-9 (KJV)
8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.


I could also bring in exegetical commentary spanning 1800 years to confirm these findings. However for the sake of space I can just tell you that they say, "The serpent in Genesis was Satan."

Eyedunno wrote:
3) The serpent was right - "Then the Lord God said, ‘See, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil" (Genesis 3:22).


Notice the term switching and implication:
Quote:
Genesis 3:4-5 (KJV)
4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.


Satan knew the fruit and the result of eating it. His definition switch of 'die' to Eve was from spiritual to physical. He knew she wouldn't physically drop dead. Second is the indictment against God of keeping something beneficial from them when was in fact it was spiritually deadly and eventually would end in physical death. More importantly to Satan was dominion. Adam had been given right and entitlement to reign in dominion over the earth. Satan used the woman to get to the man and won dominion over the earth by default of Adam's loss. While Satan's wording is technically correct, he was calling into question the meaning and implications as Eve understood them and essentially called God a liar.

Eyedunno wrote:
Missionary wrote:
Quote:
Not only is this saying that man could become a kind of god,

Not at all, "the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil" Adam is not "a kind of god" but has knowledge of good and evil just as God has knowledge of good and evil. The "sin" was the act of disobedience. The knowledge of good and evil was moral awareness. Separation from God (spiritual death) is the result of sin and man remains in that condition unless ha is spiritually reborn.

It boggles the mind that you could read this and not get anxiety on God's part out of the text. I can't wait to hear you squirm around Genesis 11. "And the Lord said, ‘Look, they are one people, and they have all one language; and this is only the beginning of what they will do; nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them.'"


Anxiety? As in God is sitting on the Throne wringing His hands worrying if mankind will build a rocket and come beat Him up? God's move at Babel is YET ANOTHER example of His mercy and patience. His desire is repentance, atonement, and forgiveness in that order. He could have killed them all and be perfectly justified by His moral nature but instead confused the languages and spread them out to give man further time to repent.

Eyedunno wrote:
Furthermore, there's the other paradox that without the knowledge of good and evil, how could Adam have known that disobedience was a problem? It seems God set him up for failure, and this is even more the case with the modern Christian concept of the Omnimax god.


The knowledge of good and evil is not necessary to obey God by faith. Free will exists regardless and in absence of that knowledge. There was a commandment given and a punishment described for disobedience. By free will Adam disobeyed and suffered the punishment warned. God never intended for us to live by moral choices (knowledge of good and evil) but by the free will choice of faith in God's Word.

Eyedunno wrote:
Missionary wrote:
Quote:
but it also implies that God never wanted Adam to live forever in the first place, which weakens the impact of the "you shall surely die" threat. Not only was it a bluff, but God had intended for them to die without eating from the tree.


It doesn't imply that at all. It said, "...and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever..." God simply did not want man to remain in this condition of sin forever. Therefore God separated them from the Tree of Life which left them to a physical death outside of Eden. He then atoned for the sin Himself by a substitute sacrifice and clothed them with the skin.

You've again stuffed your external context into it. Nobody just reading the text would ever come to that conclusion, or at least not without being convinced beforehand that it's divinely inspired.


If you found Genesis 3 on a scrap of paper and never knew anything about God or the bible? You would be correct. However, the references to the Gen 3 event sprinkled throughout scripture expound on the event to unfold a more complete picture of not only what happened but also what was meant.

Notice the references:
Job 31:33 (KJV)
33 If I covered my transgressions as Adam, by hiding mine iniquity in my bosom:
Hosea 6:7 (NASB95)
7 But like Adam they have transgressed the covenant; There they have dealt treacherously against Me.
Romans 5:14 (NASB95)
14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.
1 Corinthians 15:22 (NASB95)
22 For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive.

Notice that Adam's transgressions were covered (sin atoned for by substitute death) and Adam was literally clothed in that skin. In Hosea Adam is said to have broken a covenant. In Romans Paul says Adam died as a result of sin and in 1 Cor, physical death.
Back to top
Missionary
Guest




Local time: 6:23 PM

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

josephpalazzo wrote:

Talk to biologists who work in that field 24/7. Read the research papers in distinguished journals of science where the real action takes place. I happen to teach (24 years now) in a small college. My specialty is physics (quantum mechanics and string theory). I have many friends in the math department, and also in the biology. They have very little doubts about evolution. They work continuously with concepts that can only be supported by this theory. And there is no competing scientific theory, none whatsoever. You are right that this debate should not be in the courts. It should in the scientific community, where people have trained for years, and are exploring new territory. But the court challenge was necessary because a few unenlightened people were forcing the schools and school boards to put a theory, that is NOT scientific, into the science curriculum. Have you ever asked you why this is so only in the US? In the rest of the world, the science community is LAUGHING at us because of these courts challenges. Most biology is being developed elsewhere, mainly because of the hurdles the religious right has put up. This is a total SHAME. You want creationism, teach it in your religion class. No one in the science community will object to that. Leave the science curriculum to scientists and science education specialists.


You're assuming I want creation taught in public schools. I could care less. My opinion is that the church should not be lobbying anything to gov't having to do with following Jesus. If the US gov't wants to teach Scientology as fact, again, the church should be steering clear. The family is responsible for raising their children not the state. If a family wants to use private or home school then they should be allowed as well.

Since you're a physics teacher interested in string theory you might be able to appreciate this...maybe you missed it 2 pages back: Here's Dr. Davies edu site -
http://cosmos.asu.edu/

Quote:
Clearly, then, both religion and science are founded on faith — namely, on belief in the existence of something outside the universe, like an unexplained God or an unexplained set of physical laws, maybe even a huge ensemble of unseen universes, too. For that reason, both monotheistic religion and orthodox science fail to provide a complete account of physical existence.

This shared failing is no surprise, because the very notion of physical law is a theological one in the first place, a fact that makes many scientists squirm. Isaac Newton first got the idea of absolute, universal, perfect, immutable laws from the Christian doctrine that God created the world and ordered it in a rational way. Christians envisage God as upholding the natural order from beyond the universe, while physicists think of their laws as inhabiting an abstract transcendent realm of perfect mathematical relationships.


Full Text Here: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/davies07/davies07_index.html

My issue is this. If it takes a PhD to understand or know for certain what a PhD is telling him there's a communication problem. If the majority of the world is uncertain, apart from "all of science" then science needs to figure out a way to communicate it other than the discovery kids channel. Set up the [b]International Symposium of Scientists for Evolutionary Information Committee[/b, step up to the plate and deliver the smoking gun. Science shouldn't be laughing but educating. 3rd world and rural people aren't taking advanced biology, paleontology, and physics classes.

It's not up to courts and school boards. It's not up to atheist or anti creation website to condescend or brow beat people into submission. If science has got the dope put it up. But there's a reason they haven't. They know there's debate. They know there's court cases. And yet?? Science is silent. Where's the wall of science?
Back to top
Missionary
Guest




Local time: 6:23 PM

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

aitm wrote:
Those who stand on the floor screaming for "intelligent design" actually call it "alternative science". These idiots could not tell the difference between science and bell peppers, yet we allow them to give their opinion on things they have no knowledge.
Allowing religion to dictate what science is is like having a bricklayer dictate how to do heart surgery.


I agree that that this "religious right" are idiots for pushing this and other agendas. However, I would point out that even you yourself have admitted to not being trained in higher science and math. My point is most people aren't. That means all those people have to "trust and believe" what science tells them because they have no way of knowing for sure. I have tons of family and friends who are not Christians or religious who and not buying this stuff.

Why would I believe any institution that's too high brow and condescending to explain exactly what they have without computer generated Jurassic Park cartoon clips of dino's fighting in tar pits? They need a wall of scientists laying out a wall of evidence. Otherwise? It's just TalkOrigins and atheists shouting into the microphone about how dumb people are.
Back to top
Missionary
Guest




Local time: 6:23 PM

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raskolnikov wrote:
Missionary wrote:
Raskolnikov wrote:
Eyedunno wrote:
Oh no, now I can't resist the urge to reply. Sad
Missionary wrote:
Genesis 2:16-17 (KJV)
16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

And yet they didn't die "that very day" in the story - heck, he lived 930 years (Genesis 5:5). This leaves you to talk about nonsense like "spiritual death" to try and save this story from its own inconsistencies. Furthermore, the reason God kicked Adam out of the garden was not a direct consequence of Adam eating from the tree. God saw that Adam was like the gods in his knowledge of good and evil, and was afraid that as a consequence of this new knowledge, Adam might also eat of the Tree of Life, granting him immortality (Genesis 3:22-23). Not only is this saying that man could become a kind of god, but it also implies that God never wanted Adam to live forever in the first place, which weakens the impact of the "you shall surely die" threat. Not only was it a bluff, but God had intended for them to die without eating from the tree.

It's an okay story, read as mythology, but for you to treat it as inspired by your all-knowing hoodoo sky fairy and worthy of serious consideration is pretty pathetic.


QFT and unless you show me, Missionary, a verse in Genesis that specifically says that death is the penalty for sin then you just lied to us.


Gen 2:17 God gives 1) commandment and 2) punishment for disobedience, "..the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, 1) thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof 2) thou shalt surely die."

Gen 3:17 God pronounces Adam guilty of disobedience "Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee"

Gen 3:19 God pronounces death "...till thou return unto the ground; [snip] and unto dust shalt thou return."


I still don't see it say death is the punishment for sin. Adam didn't die the day he disobeyed god like the Bible says.


Adam died that day (first) spiritually, was separated from God and the Tree of Life. God temporarily (second death) atoned for Adam's sin with a sacrifice (substitute death) and clothed him with the skin of that animal. God then forgave Adam and he lived for 930 years total; and finally he physically died because of sin. God did not allow Adam to eat from the Tree of Life and live forever in sin. Rather the Tree of Life will be reintroduced to mankind as written in Revelation 22 following the Judgment.

The death you're looking for to take place on the same day as the sin was 1) spiritual death, and 2) atoned for by a substitute death; the sacrifice of an animal.
Back to top
Missionary
Guest




Local time: 6:23 PM

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pr126 wrote:
Did Adam have a bellybutton?

/


No. Adam had what's called a "belly velcro pouch" where he kept loose change and chapstick. Very Happy
Back to top
Missionary
Guest




Local time: 6:23 PM

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bardolph86 wrote:
Missionary wrote:
Also, you seem to be under the impression, as most, that I would want to convince or persuade you of something. I have no intention of such.


But isn't that what you're supposed to do? Isn't that the duty of followers of Jesus?


Nope. We just point. The duty of the believer is love God, love man, follow Christ, and proclaim Him. Whether a person answers God's call is between them and God.

I'm just a pointer.
Back to top
Missionary
Guest




Local time: 6:23 PM

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Juno22 wrote:
It's boggles my mind that an adult can possibly believe the Noah's Ark stuff.


Imagine the hassle he got from PETA for cruelty and greenpeace for the timber operation. Very Happy
Back to top
Juno22
"Some Chicken—Some Neck!"


Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Posts: 294
Local time: 2:23 AM

ca.gif

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:06 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I'd love to see the 'wall of evidence' which supports Noah's Ark or Adam and Eve. Lol c'mon man, I feel like I'm talking to a 5 year old with a wild imagination.

As for the 'wall of evidence' for evolution, the science has been published, why don't you read it? And if you disagree then PROVE IT. You'd be famous if you disproved evolution.
_________________
"People who harbor strong convictions without evidence belong at the margins of our societies, not in our halls of power." - Sam Harris
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Amberli
<Something Profound>


Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 482
Local time: 1:23 AM
Location: San Bernardino, CA
us.gif

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:41 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote


_________________
I smile because I don't know what the hell is going on.

Life is not about what happens to you. It's about how you fucking DEAL with what happens to you

Every guy here has an amazing relationship with his penis, almost like a friendship.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Missionary
Guest




Local time: 6:23 PM

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Juno22 wrote:
I'd love to see the 'wall of evidence' which supports Noah's Ark or Adam and Eve. Lol c'mon man, I feel like I'm talking to a 5 year old with a wild imagination.

As for the 'wall of evidence' for evolution, the science has been published, why don't you read it? And if you disagree then PROVE IT. You'd be famous if you disproved evolution.


God's wall of evidence is before you. You deny it. The lies that man is a chimp have no proof. I don't buy it.
Back to top
joshuas3521
Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition!


Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Posts: 2236
Local time: 3:23 AM
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
us.gif

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:48 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Missionary wrote:
The lies that man is a chimp have no proof. I don't buy it.



_________________
"What I'm saying is, if God wanted to send us a message, and ancient writings were the only way he could think of doing it, he could have done a better job." --Carl Sagan

"In the beginning the universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move." --Douglas Adams

In memory of George Carlin. May he rest in peace.

Ignore list:
<empty>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Raggle Fraggle
Smells Chiiiicken


Joined: 06 Feb 2008
Posts: 1028
Local time: 4:23 AM
Location: Virginia
us.gif

PostPosted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:49 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Missionary wrote:
God's wall of evidence is before you. You deny it. The lies that man is a chimp have no proof. I don't buy it.


What evidence? The Bible?
_________________
Could you repeat that? I think I had something crazy in my ear.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> Enter The Darkness All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 89, 90, 91 ... 141, 142, 143  Next
Page 90 of 143

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Hotels in Krakow - Mortgage - Online Advertising - Books - Remortgages
phpBB SEO