| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
greyghost Annoyingly Addicting

Joined: 19 Sep 2007 Posts: 1251 Local time: 4:57 AM Location: Earth, Milky way, Universe
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jkorath wrote: |
I don't know which group is most ignorant/childish: Satanists or Christians who actually take satanists seriously. |
None, the answer would be Satanists who take satanism seriously. Back when I posted more regularly I mentioned I had an ex who was a satanist, but not really.
I will repeat that one more time: A SATANIST, BUT NOT REALLY. 'Nuff said.... _________________ "There is no such uncertainty, as a sure thing."-Robert Burns
"A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be."-Albert Einstein
"Patriotism is the willingness to kill and be killed for trivial reasons."-Bertrand Russell
"I want someone to quote me in their signature. That's why I'm a pandering whore."-CET
New blog entry- 11/03/08 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Tornado_Creator Royal Citizen


Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 328 Local time: 9:57 AM

|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You had a bad experience there T. Superstar, not all Satanists are like that.
Although I'm not actively a part of the CoS, I used to be quite an active Satanist. About a third to a half of them are atheists, which shocked me, because I thought it was basically atheism with a shared philosophy but it's not, and many of them actually believe in God, demons and magic which personally I find insulting to the intelligence of the atheistic satanists however as a philosophy, I can't find much wrong with it.
The reason for paying the $200 is simple and understandable. It's security. Many people would claim to be satanists just so they can join the church, find out who else is a satanist, and cause shit for them as it gets a lot of bad rep.
Honestly, I still follow many of the ideals of Satanism. I don't tolerate people being rude to me in my own home, I respect people in their home, I avoid stupidity, pretentiousness and self-deceit as traits in both myself and those I associate with. I try to keep perspective and challenge popular decision. I question authority and avoid being too prideful.
All in all, if someone says they're a satanist I feel no lack of respect for them and I feel I would likely have many opinions in common. If someone asked me if I was a satanist, I'm unsure how I would answer. I would however ask them if they believed in God, if they said no, I would probably feel quite comfortable around them.
As for the name, satanist is hebrew for "coping with adversaries" it's why Satan is called Satan, it means "Adversary". The term satanist actually pre-dates Christianity, not sure if it pre-dates Judaism though.
One of the major faults you did make T. Superstar is telling a satanist that they broke any satanic rules. That basically told them that you didn't get it. Satanism is very much opposed to religious dogma. The rules are guidelines, nothing more. You take what you can from them. If you wish you build on them and live your life based of a set of rules that you personally arrived at based on your own ideals and personal values. It's the most important teaching of satanism and the one most people don't understand. I suppose, considering this rule, I am more a satanist than most people who call themselves satanists, as I've done exactly what was intended. I've taken what I like and decided to build my life with my own values, while incorporating some of the ideas of LaVey.
If anyone else has any questions on satanism I would be happy to answer them if people want to PM me, however I was only an active satanist for about a year and a half. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Totalitarian Superstar Intern


Joined: 28 Jun 2008 Posts: 62 Local time: 2:57 AM Location: America

|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | | You had a bad experience there T. Superstar, not all Satanists are like that. |
Thanks for writing a civil post. It's getting boring having a bunch of adolescents bother me.
I understand not all Satanists are like that. But generally speaking, almost everyone I know who is in the CoS are like that. People who are Satanists but don't adhere to some silly organization tend to behave better.
Yeah, it was a bizzare experience.
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | | Although I'm not actively a part of the CoS, I used to be quite an active Satanist. About a third to a half of them are atheists, which shocked me, because I thought it was basically atheism with a shared philosophy but it's not, and many of them actually believe in God, demons and magic which personally I find insulting to the intelligence of the atheistic satanists however as a philosophy, I can't find much wrong with it. |
That's strange. I thought LaVey said Satanist who believe in that stuff are "kooks"; in fact the CoS has terms for them, like "kooks", and "faux Satanists"?
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | | The reason for paying the $200 is simple and understandable. It's security. Many people would claim to be satanists just so they can join the church, find out who else is a satanist, and cause shit for them as it gets a lot of bad rep. |
Alright that makes sense now.
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | | Honestly, I still follow many of the ideals of Satanism. I don't tolerate people being rude to me in my own home, I respect people in their home, I avoid stupidity, pretentiousness and self-deceit as traits in both myself and those I associate with. I try to keep perspective and challenge popular decision. I question authority and avoid being too prideful. |
I like some of the ideals of Satanism. As you can tell, I treat people the way they treat me. Knight_Skinhead and Dawk_in_the_closet get no respect from me and it's entirely earned.
Because of Satanism, I have a very confrontational attitude with people who are rude for no reason. I see no reason to show civility and respect to complete retards.
Satanism does teach pride has its limits. Egotistic individuals are too prideful and ruin life for the rest of us.
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | | All in all, if someone says they're a satanist I feel no lack of respect for them and I feel I would likely have many opinions in common. If someone asked me if I was a satanist, I'm unsure how I would answer. I would however ask them if they believed in God, if they said no, I would probably feel quite comfortable around them. |
Well after my experience I obviously have a grudge against the CoS but not against individual Satanists like yourself. I also am more comfortable with secularists (agnostics and atheists and others) than theists.
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | | As for the name, satanist is hebrew for "coping with adversaries" it's why Satan is called Satan, it means "Adversary". The term satanist actually pre-dates Christianity, not sure if it pre-dates Judaism though. |
I didn't know that; thank you for sharing that with me.
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | | One of the major faults you did make T. Superstar is telling a satanist that they broke any satanic rules. That basically told them that you didn't get it. Satanism is very much opposed to religious dogma. The rules are guidelines, nothing more. You take what you can from them. If you wish you build on them and live your life based of a set of rules that you personally arrived at based on your own ideals and personal values. It's the most important teaching of satanism and the one most people don't understand. I suppose, considering this rule, I am more a satanist than most people who call themselves satanists, as I've done exactly what was intended. I've taken what I like and decided to build my life with my own values, while incorporating some of the ideas of LaVey. |
I only pointed out each time he broke a Satanic rule because he said I broke rules. I was giving him what he gave me; if he was a Satanist he would understand that. I think I have my response and his post saved, I could relay it to you. It's absolutely sick how rude he is and how blatantly unSatanic he was. Due to him and due to Ventrue not giving a shit, I lost interest in CoS.
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | | If anyone else has any questions on satanism I would be happy to answer them if people want to PM me, however I was only an active satanist for about a year and a half. |
If I come up with questions I'll be sure to ask you.
Thank you for your civility. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3kixintehead Intern

Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 62 Local time: 3:57 AM
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Doesn't seem all the bad to me. Probably just villainized by Christians. I like the nine satanic sins lol: |
Perhaps because of statements like this:
When walking in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him
If a guest in your lair annoys you, treat him cruelly and without mercy
Acknowledge the power of magic if you have employed it successfully to obtain your desires. If you deny the power of magic after having called upon it with success, you will lose all you have obtained
A few of the Satanic Statements as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tornado_Creator Royal Citizen


Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 328 Local time: 9:57 AM

|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Remember that the Satanic Statements and Satanic Rules as well as many other parts of Satanism are meant to be read with a slight mocking feel and an air of irony. The fact that they are pretending to be rules in the irony, the wording is exceptionally overzealous to make that point more apparent. Again it's a matter of, "Have you really got it". Remember in Satanism you should learn something, and get some value from what it has to teach, but nothing should be set in stone and nothing is to be taken so seriously.
The first rule.
"When walking in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him".
This should be taken as meaning.
"When in public be considerate of other people, do not be patient or polite with people who are not considerate of you".
The second rule.
"If a guest in your lair annoys you, treat him cruelly and without mercy".
This should be taken as meaning.
"Do not tolerate people being disrespectful to you in your own home"
Also remember the above rule comes directly after.
"When in another’s lair, show them respect or else do not go there".
Which honestly, change the word lair to home and it's perfect.
And finally.
"Acknowledge the power of magic if you have employed it successfully to obtain your desires. If you deny the power of magic after having called upon it with success, you will lose all you have obtained".
This can be interpreted as meaning many things depending on your beliefs. I took it to mean.
"If you succeed in casting magic, don't claim it's not real a few days later... but remember the 'if' at the beginning".
Or alternatively.
"If you're going to prayer to an invisible sky daddy, don't mock other people for praying to a different invisible sky daddy".
Either one works.
Remember if you're taking it seriously and literally, you're missing the point. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tornado_Creator Royal Citizen


Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 328 Local time: 9:57 AM

|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Totalitarian Superstar wrote: | | Thank you for your civility. |
No need to thank me, and I imagine you wouldn't have thought it necessary if it wasn't for people calling themselves Satanists in the past being so uncivil, but thanks all the same.
As for whether I still give myself that title, I wonder sometimes. Some days I would openly say I'm a Satanist, others I would laugh and say I left those ideas over a year ago. It depends really. I suppose I am in the way I live my life, however as far as organisations go, both the Church of Satan and the First Satanic Church are rather misguided in my eyes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Totalitarian Superstar Intern


Joined: 28 Jun 2008 Posts: 62 Local time: 2:57 AM Location: America

|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | | Totalitarian Superstar wrote: | | Thank you for your civility. |
No need to thank me, and I imagine you wouldn't have thought it necessary if it wasn't for people calling themselves Satanists in the past being so uncivil, but thanks all the same.
As for whether I still give myself that title, I wonder sometimes. Some days I would openly say I'm a Satanist, others I would laugh and say I left those ideas over a year ago. It depends really. I suppose I am in the way I live my life, however as far as organisations go, both the Church of Satan and the First Satanic Church are rather misguided in my eyes. |
I thanked you because you're among the most civil people I've met here so far. I appreciated it very much.
Why don't you just say you're a humanist? You don't have to, but it might be more accurate. Or a Naturalistic Humanist. I'm kindof phobic towards "Satanist" but it's not a bother to me on any serious level.
About your comments on both Churches, you are right. They have lost perspective. They have lost sight of the teachings of LaVey and now they are only interested in hierarchy and elitism.
I do consider myself a Satanist on many levels. Satanism is different from humanism. I obviously reject the mystical hocus-pocus of Satanism, but I completely love the ways to behave and interact. They're great advice for treating people the way they treat you.
Therefore, perhaps someone needs to create a free organization of unaffiliated Satanists. Instead of organizing some silly little church, just make it a place online where Satanists and others can speak freely. Clearly it would be Satanist-centered, but it would allow other viewpoints. CoS' forum does NOT allow other viewpoints nor debate, which I think is adolescent of them. We can't evolve ourselves without being challenged fundamentally, can we not? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tornado_Creator Royal Citizen


Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 328 Local time: 9:57 AM

|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Humanism is something completely different and something I know too little about to be able to give myself that label.
One thing that has occurred to me, and perhaps I'm doing this based only out of admiration for Anton LaVey. But he always stated religion should never be taken seriously and you should just take what little bits of value you can from it and leave the rest. I wonder if all the hocus-pocus crap was put there as nothing more than a joke, a way of making his point clearer that he thinks religions are taken too far. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raskolnikov The Axe Murderer

Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 1906 Local time: 1:57 AM Location: Las Vegas

|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:03 am Post subject: Re: Satanism: Why's it got such a bad rap? |
|
|
| Totalitarian Superstar wrote: | | Raskolnikov wrote: | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Satan
Doesn't seem all the bad to me. Probably just villainized by Christians. I like the nine satanic sins lol:
Stupidity
Pretentiousness
Solipsism
Self-deceit
Herd Conformity
Lack of Perspective
Forgetfulness of Past Orthodoxies
Counterproductive Pride
Lack of Aesthetics |
Satanists are exceptionally rude for no reason.
I was about to join their Church just for shits and giggles, and because I like their ideas (I don't agree with all of them), so I posted some Nietzschean views which conform to Satanist writings.
Some guy named Daark who is a mod basically tells me he's a big shot and he doesn't like me and he'll ban me. I literally hadn't been there for 30 minutes before I was told off like this.
So I write to him back through PM, telling him he's broken 11 Satanic Church rules.
His response: ban me. So I contact Ventrue, and he doesn't care.
Satanists are just as bad as the Theists they hate.
And the funniest thing is all I did was just post one post that wasn't offensive; no harsh language, just an analysis of the ideas of Nietzsche in a "Nietzsche 101".
Besides, to join the CoS you have to pay them $200. |
Not talkin about Satanists, just the philosophy of Satanism (Specifically the La Veyan Satanism) Here's what Peter H. Gilmore, the current leader, says about Satanism:
"Satanists do not believe in the supernatural, in neither God nor the Devil. To the Satanist, he is his own God. Satan is a symbol of Man living as his prideful, carnal nature dictates. The reality behind Satan is simply the dark evolutionary force of entropy that permeates all of nature and provides the drive for survival and propagation inherent in all living things. Satan is not a conscious entity to be worshipped, rather a reservoir of power inside each human to be tapped at will. Thus any concept of sacrifice is rejected as a Christian aberration—in Satanism there’s no deity to which one can sacrifice."
Aside from all the woo-woo shit, it doesn't seem all that bad. It doesn't advocate violence (Except when exacting revenge on someone who wrongs you), it encourages individualism, and it advocates naturalism and common sense. IMO, Christianity is far worse. _________________ "Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, underwhich weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God, for if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
-Thomas Jefferson
"The future is not set in stone. The future is what you make it. So make it a good one!"
-Dr. Emmett Brown |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Totalitarian Superstar Intern


Joined: 28 Jun 2008 Posts: 62 Local time: 2:57 AM Location: America

|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have said multiple times I like the ideals of Satanism. If anything, I've clarified that my enemy is the Church of Satan which wronged me. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oradan Visitor


Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 23 Local time: 3:57 AM
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think by name, Satanism is just stroking the Christian's big egos. It's a "See there are people praying to the devil just like god said." Wether or not they actually are preying to the lord of knowledge. _________________ "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
Stephen Roberts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tornado_Creator Royal Citizen


Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 328 Local time: 9:57 AM

|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not Satanisms fault that Christianity named their devil Satan. Satanism has been practised for a long time, longer than Christianity even, it just wasn't put into an organised form until Anton LaVey did so recently. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raskolnikov The Axe Murderer

Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 1906 Local time: 1:57 AM Location: Las Vegas

|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | | It's not Satanisms fault that Christianity named their devil Satan. Satanism has been practised for a long time, longer than Christianity even, it just wasn't put into an organised form until Anton LaVey did so recently. |
Interesting. What proof do you have of this? _________________ "Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, underwhich weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God, for if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
-Thomas Jefferson
"The future is not set in stone. The future is what you make it. So make it a good one!"
-Dr. Emmett Brown |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tornado_Creator Royal Citizen


Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 328 Local time: 9:57 AM

|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have any proof at the present moment, but give me some time and I'll look up a few things for you. I was shown the evidence for this a while ago and it's common knowledge amongst the Satanist community...
All I know is the word Satanist comes from the Hebrew language, and it's actually entirely coincidental that it was also the word used to describe Satan. LaVey simply made the connection apparent when he formed Satanism into as a cohesive entity.
If I remember rightly it was in Greece about 500BC there was a famous philosopher who suggested Satanist ideals and hedonism as being the way life was intended to be. Stating "If God made us, he put our wants and pleasures in place. So if we want food we have food, if we want sex we have sex. God would want what we want, as he put our wants there. Thus if I want it, God wants it. My will is Gods will."
As I said, it wasn't collectively known as Satanism until Anton LaVey's influence, however it was called that in some cases even before Christianity and I will endeavour to find proof of this for you as well as any other names the practice went under. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Totalitarian Superstar Intern


Joined: 28 Jun 2008 Posts: 62 Local time: 2:57 AM Location: America

|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tornado_Creator wrote: | I don't have any proof at the present moment, but give me some time and I'll look up a few things for you. I was shown the evidence for this a while ago and it's common knowledge amongst the Satanist community...
All I know is the word Satanist comes from the Hebrew language, and it's actually entirely coincidental that it was also the word used to describe Satan. LaVey simply made the connection apparent when he formed Satanism into as a cohesive entity.
If I remember rightly it was in Greece about 500BC there was a famous philosopher who suggested Satanist ideals and hedonism as being the way life was intended to be. Stating "If God made us, he put our wants and pleasures in place. So if we want food we have food, if we want sex we have sex. God would want what we want, as he put our wants there. Thus if I want it, God wants it. My will is Gods will."
As I said, it wasn't collectively known as Satanism until Anton LaVey's influence, however it was called that in some cases even before Christianity and I will endeavour to find proof of this for you as well as any other names the practice went under. |
I did a google search because I'm also familiar with a Greek philosopher, couldn't remember his name, who preached hedonism and did have ideals similar to LaVey.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicurus
Allow me to quote the article a little bit:
| Quote: | Epicurus (Greek Έπίκουρος) (341 BCE, Samos – 270 BCE, Athens) was an ancient Greek philosopher and the founder of the school of philosophy called Epicureanism. Only a few fragments and letters remain of Epicurus's 300 written works. Much of what we know about Epicurean philosophy derives from later followers and commentators.
For Epicurus, the purpose of philosophy was to attain the happy, tranquil life, characterized by aponia, the absence of pain and fear, and by living a self-sufficient life surrounded by friends. He taught that pleasure and pain are the measures of what is good and bad, that death is the end of the body and the soul and should therefore not be feared, that the gods do not reward or punish humans, that the universe is infinite and eternal, and that events in the world are ultimately based on the motions and interactions of atoms moving in empty space.
An inscription on the gate to the garden is recorded by Seneca in his Epistle XXI:
Stranger, here you will do well to tarry; here our highest good is pleasure.
Epicurus emphasized friendship as an important ingredient of happiness, and the school resembled in many ways a community of friends living together. However, he also instituted a hierarchical system of levels among his followers, and had them swear an oath on his core tenets. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicurus#Teachings
Enjoy the article and read up on Epicureanism. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|