| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rickyroma Repressed hippy

Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 6516 Local time: 6:27 AM Location: England
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 7:43 am Post subject: Creationism in Orwell's 1984 |
|
|
Is denying evolutionary biology as absurd as denying that 2 and 2 make 4?
Quite literally yes:
[Winston:] 'But the world itself is only a speck of dust. And man is tiny helpless! How long has he been in existence? For millions of years the earth was uninhabited.'
[O'Brien:] 'Nonsense. The earth is as old as we are, no older. How could it be older? Nothing exists except through human consciousness.'
'But the rocks are full of the bones of extinct animals -- mammoths and mastodons and enormous reptiles which lived here long before man was ever heard of.'
'Have you ever seen those bones, Winston? Of course not. Nineteenth-century biologists invented them. Before man there was nothing. After man, if he could come to an end, there would be nothing. Outside man there is nothing.'
'But the whole universe is outside us. Look at the stars ! Some of them are a million light-years away. They are out of our reach for ever.'
'What are the stars?' said O'Brien indifferently. 'They are bits of fire a few kilometres away. We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out. The earth is the centre of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it.'
George Orwell, 1984 _________________ Theists wank too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
redraiderdude187 The Madcap Laugher

Joined: 19 Jan 2007 Posts: 1152 Local time: 1:27 AM Location: Houston, Texas

|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 9:31 am Post subject: Re: Creationism in Orwell's 1984 |
|
|
| rickyroma wrote: | Is denying evolutionary biology as absurd as denying that 2 and 2 make 4?
Quite literally yes:
[Winston:] 'But the world itself is only a speck of dust. And man is tiny helpless! How long has he been in existence? For millions of years the earth was uninhabited.'
[O'Brien:] 'Nonsense. The earth is as old as we are, no older. How could it be older? Nothing exists except through human consciousness.'
'But the rocks are full of the bones of extinct animals -- mammoths and mastodons and enormous reptiles which lived here long before man was ever heard of.'
'Have you ever seen those bones, Winston? Of course not. Nineteenth-century biologists invented them. Before man there was nothing. After man, if he could come to an end, there would be nothing. Outside man there is nothing.'
'But the whole universe is outside us. Look at the stars ! Some of them are a million light-years away. They are out of our reach for ever.'
'What are the stars?' said O'Brien indifferently. 'They are bits of fire a few kilometres away. We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out. The earth is the centre of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it.'
George Orwell, 1984 |
Some of George Orwell's predictions for the world are staggering, especially if you compare them to Maoist China during the cultural revolution. _________________ Above the hive, beyond the lynch mob, where two and two always make four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ophis Royal Citizen


Joined: 15 Feb 2006 Posts: 470 Local time: 7:27 AM Location: Manchester, UK
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 1984 seems to me much closer to religion than to any authoritarian regime. This is especially obvious in Winston's conversion in the last couple of pages. Pretty much every theme in that book is analogous to some major aspect of Christianity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Specus_Meretricis Peddler of Bombast

Joined: 08 Mar 2007 Posts: 2754 Local time: 2:27 AM
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would think it has a lot more to do with that societies need to "cleanse the past" and have total control over all thoughts. If they supported science, it would just naturally lead to questioning Big Brother or the leadership. By saying "there is only us and we are all that matters", you are basically saying "Nothing will change, so do not envision a world without us in control of it"
Not that it isn't a criticism of Church, but I took it more to be a way of preventing anyone from eventually wanting to overthrow the government. _________________ Fuck you bitch!!! I told you the asparagus is in the freezer! - William Shatner
What do you call someone that doesn't laugh at asparagus jokes? A human being. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SalsaShark has filled in a custom rank.

Joined: 07 Aug 2006 Posts: 1036 Local time: 4:27 PM Location: Regina SK CAN

|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Specus_Meretricis wrote: | I would think it has a lot more to do with that societies need to "cleanse the past" and have total control over all thoughts. If they supported science, it would just naturally lead to questioning Big Brother or the leadership. By saying "there is only us and we are all that matters", you are basically saying "Nothing will change, so do not envision a world without us in control of it"
Not that it isn't a criticism of Church, but I took it more to be a way of preventing anyone from eventually wanting to overthrow the government. |
I definitely agree with you. I also think it has a lot to do with how much control they actually have vs. how much control the populace thinks they have. I did get a lot of anti-christianity in the book, but I don't think that particular quote has a lot to do with christianity or creationism. Just power. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rickyroma Repressed hippy

Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 6516 Local time: 6:27 AM Location: England
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Everyone I know interprets 1984 to suit their own opinions. Christians will tell you it is a parable against atheistic states such as the Soviets and North Korea; capitalists that it is about the evils of communism; socialists that it is about the evils of inequalities in wealth and power; atheists that it is a metaphor for religion. _________________ Theists wank too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Friend thinking
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 796 Local time: 4:27 PM
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The book is a response to personality cults, be they based either on the fictional super attributes given to a real-life leader figure (aka. Kim Jong-il, Mao), or fictional super attributes given to an imagined Wizard of Oz like leader figure (aka. Bible God, and other fictional religious gods). It describes a society which relies on misinformation, and ignorance to maintain authoritarian order. Which is why any form of government secrecy, or other cultish group secrecy is so pernicious. Take for example Islamic suicide bombers. A major reason why they keep coming is because they are conditioned as pubescent teens to think their cause is all holy Big Brother by middle-aged Islamic extremists who expect their young people to respect manager seniority status. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nimitz Guest
Local time: 4:27 PM
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rickyroma said: | Quote: | | 'What are the stars?' said O'Brien indifferently. 'They are bits of fire a few kilometres away. |
It's funny you posted this passage. I read the a similar statement yesterday on a fundie board. (you know the one) Science can't possibly tell how far away the stars really are. It's impossible to triangulate them from Earth. They could only be a few thousand light years away at most. Creation is only a few thousand years old, so that all adds up. But another opinion was that the star really are billions of light years away, but the light coming from them was created so we could see it. In transit as it were. "Insta-light" was the word used.
Fuckin' shoot me now!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rickyroma Repressed hippy

Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 6516 Local time: 6:27 AM Location: England
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Friend wrote: | | The book is a response to personality cults |
It certainly exploits personality cults as a literary device but I would be wary of declaring the novel as a response to them.
But then I am very anal when it comes to 1984.
For those interested I have recently joined a 1984 discussion forum. It's full of atheists, unsurprisingly. _________________ Theists wank too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rickyroma Repressed hippy

Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 6516 Local time: 6:27 AM Location: England
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Nimitz wrote: | | the star really are billions of light years away, but the light coming from them was created so we could see it. In transit as it were. "Insta-light" was the word used. |
"Insta-light" lol. I love it when creationist dickheads make up scientific sounding terms for their bullshit. _________________ Theists wank too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|