The Infidel Guy Show
The Debate Hour Show

Faith and Freethought
3 Podcasts, One Feed

or visit this page.


FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MemberlistMemberlist    UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister   
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 VideoRoom and ChatLive Video and Chat Room   The Infidel Guy's Video RoomFreethought Videos
BlogsBlogs    My BlogWeblogs News


Embed Our Player

~ TIP JAR ~


Military lawsuit in Kansas

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> News Stories and Current Events
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
WashMDJD
Forum Leader
Forum Leader


Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 794
Local time: 1:48 AM
Location: Everett/Seattle, WA
us.gif

PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 6:52 pm    Post subject: Military lawsuit in Kansas Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Yet another atheist with the balls to sue the U.S. military for its unconstitutional proselytizing of evangelical Christianity - again from Kansas. It's 16 pages long, but well-worth the read - particularly the 'facts' of the alleged abuses.

http://www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org/urgent%20_issues/complain_sept08.pdf
_________________
"Ne mea dona tibi studio disposta fideli,
Intellecta prius quam sint, contempta reliquas."
-Lucretius, De rerum natura

("...that my gifts here set forth for you with faithful solicitude, may not by you be contempuously discarded before they have been understood.")

"Mes amis, si j'avance, suivez-moi! Si je recule, tuez-moi! Si je meurs, vengez-moi!" --Henri de la Rochejaquelein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chookrooter
Forum Master
Forum Master


Joined: 07 Jun 2008
Posts: 2271
Local time: 7:18 PM

as.gif

PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 8:44 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Fascinating reading.

What realistic chances does the guy have of (a) winning and (b) remaining in the military with his career unaffected?

Generally speaking,no armed forces anywhere encourage individual thought or action. Members,especially combat troops are distrustful of anyone obviously "different." It's not about beliefs per se, but about being seen as a trustworthy part of the group.

When I was drafted , I tried to have "agnostic" put on my dog tags. I was told that option was not available.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
WashMDJD
Forum Leader
Forum Leader


Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 794
Local time: 1:48 AM
Location: Everett/Seattle, WA
us.gif

PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 3:51 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

chookrooter wrote:
Fascinating reading.

What realistic chances does the guy have of (a) winning and (b) remaining in the military with his career unaffected?

Generally speaking,no armed forces anywhere encourage individual thought or action. Members,especially combat troops are distrustful of anyone obviously "different." It's not about beliefs per se, but about being seen as a trustworthy part of the group.

When I was drafted , I tried to have "agnostic" put on my dog tags. I was told that option was not available.


On a legal basis, I think the soldier has a strong claim, but then again, I'm routinely shocked at some of the church-state decisions courts hand down. I think our national jurisprudence on religion in public life is radically incorrect, and I place the blame squarely on two factors: the move to democritize courts by making judges elected officials responsive to an electorate instead of life-tenured appointed positions, and the strong influence of conservative Christianity in our public square. In order to avoid pissing off an overwhelming portion of the country that thinks there's nothing wrong with forcing people to pray in public schools, the courts have had to chart a narrow path between what I think is the correct jurisprudence and one which openly embraces Christianity. They've done this largely by claiming that most religious-seeming phenomena in the public square are, in fact, not religious at all, but are merely expressions of a purely symbolic deism. While this means that the 'God' on American money isn't the God of Christianity at all, this fact doesn't register in the minds of the devout, and they claim victory - when in reality it is more like a mutual loss.

The government's official position when it comes to religious orthodoxy must, by necessity, be "no comment" when it comes to giving meaning to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. If this soldier's allegations are correct, then the government went well beyond the "no comment" level and was actively encouraging a particular brand of religion.

That said, there are two pragmatic considerations here: First, the same conservative values that inform our religious jurisprudence now are especially strong in Kansas (my old home state) - we're the ones after all who had the big flap when our state school board voted to "de-emphasize" the teaching of evolution. Whichever judge gets assigned this case is going to likely be steeped in these values from head to toe and will more than likely find some way to justify most of it or restrict the relief sought to some minor penalty as opposed to an injunction to stop the practices, military-wide. Secondly, countervailing that, the attorney representing the fellow is one of the single best civil rights attorneys on the Plains. When somebody's facing discrimination or the like, Pedro's the one you call, and he gets the job done.

So it's up in the air. Somehow, though, I don't see it likely that the 10th circuit district court judge in Kansas is going to find for the young man in this case. It'll likely have to be taken up by the 10th circuit court of appeals after a judgment against him - that's my prediction anyway.
_________________
"Ne mea dona tibi studio disposta fideli,
Intellecta prius quam sint, contempta reliquas."
-Lucretius, De rerum natura

("...that my gifts here set forth for you with faithful solicitude, may not by you be contempuously discarded before they have been understood.")

"Mes amis, si j'avance, suivez-moi! Si je recule, tuez-moi! Si je meurs, vengez-moi!" --Henri de la Rochejaquelein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hit_me_up024
Forum Master
Forum Master


Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Posts: 2392
Local time: 4:48 AM
Location: My parents basement.
us.gif

PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 3:54 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

good the military needs to move out of that holy roller shit
_________________
I know the game is crazy it's mo' crazy than it's ever been. I'm married to that crazy BITCH call me kevin federline.


Props to Enemy_of_Reality
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Kosh
Intergalactic masturbator


Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 366
Local time: 7:48 PM
Location: Pohjola

PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 3:58 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

chookrooter wrote:

When I was drafted , I tried to have "agnostic" put on my dog tags. I was told that option was not available.

What kind of an army do you speak of? My dog tags (and that goes for everybody who has served) only has a name and a number.
_________________
"God is an invention of Man. So the nature of God is a shallow mystery. The deep mystery is the nature of man." - Nanrei Kobori

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chookrooter
Forum Master
Forum Master


Joined: 07 Jun 2008
Posts: 2271
Local time: 7:18 PM

as.gif

PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:01 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:
What kind of an army do you speak of? My dog tags (and that goes for everybody who has served) only has a name and a number.


Australian.

I served with the First Battalian, Royal Australian Regiment. OK,it WAS almost 40 years ago. I may be mistaken about what was on my dog tags,and made the assumption because I WAS told that "agnostic" was not choice for one's religion.

I'm not sure where the tags are now. I think I gave them to my little brother who was 12 when I got home. I'll see if I can get hold of them and check.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kosh
Intergalactic masturbator


Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 366
Local time: 7:48 PM
Location: Pohjola

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:39 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

chookrooter wrote:
Quote:
What kind of an army do you speak of? My dog tags (and that goes for everybody who has served) only has a name and a number.


Australian.

I served with the First Battalian, Royal Australian Regiment. OK,it WAS almost 40 years ago. I may be mistaken about what was on my dog tags,and made the assumption because I WAS told that "agnostic" was not choice for one's religion.

I'm not sure where the tags are now. I think I gave them to my little brother who was 12 when I got home. I'll see if I can get hold of them and check.

Ok, it just seemed odd to me that ones religion would be written in ones dog tags.
_________________
"God is an invention of Man. So the nature of God is a shallow mystery. The deep mystery is the nature of man." - Nanrei Kobori

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Moloth
Fateless


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23105
Local time: 4:48 AM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
us.gif

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:44 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Kosh wrote:
chookrooter wrote:
Quote:
What kind of an army do you speak of? My dog tags (and that goes for everybody who has served) only has a name and a number.


Australian.

I served with the First Battalian, Royal Australian Regiment. OK,it WAS almost 40 years ago. I may be mistaken about what was on my dog tags,and made the assumption because I WAS told that "agnostic" was not choice for one's religion.

I'm not sure where the tags are now. I think I gave them to my little brother who was 12 when I got home. I'll see if I can get hold of them and check.

Ok, it just seemed odd to me that ones religion would be written in ones dog tags.


its so that they know which burial rites to give you, even out in the field.
_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-

www.Moloth.com

Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
SvZurich
Loki's Little Valkyrie


Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 23452
Local time: 1:48 AM
Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC

PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:32 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Mine said Southern Baptist back in the day. /spits
_________________
Kimberly (HSBUH) aka
Baroness Sylvia von Zurich (the only Goldwater Conservative) endorses the Meadow Party's Bill and Opus for the 2012 Presidential election!

The Atheist Forums have new rules!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Kosh
Intergalactic masturbator


Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 366
Local time: 7:48 PM
Location: Pohjola

PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:48 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Moloth wrote:
Kosh wrote:
chookrooter wrote:
Quote:
What kind of an army do you speak of? My dog tags (and that goes for everybody who has served) only has a name and a number.


Australian.

I served with the First Battalian, Royal Australian Regiment. OK,it WAS almost 40 years ago. I may be mistaken about what was on my dog tags,and made the assumption because I WAS told that "agnostic" was not choice for one's religion.

I'm not sure where the tags are now. I think I gave them to my little brother who was 12 when I got home. I'll see if I can get hold of them and check.

Ok, it just seemed odd to me that ones religion would be written in ones dog tags.


its so that they know which burial rites to give you, even out in the field.


Well our system is different then as we tend to bring our dead home to be buried. It's propably a legacy from the Winter- and Continuation wars.

EDIT: And we have all the information needed on the civil records, so all which is needed is ones number to determine the choice of poison.
_________________
"God is an invention of Man. So the nature of God is a shallow mystery. The deep mystery is the nature of man." - Nanrei Kobori

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George Orwell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chookrooter
Forum Master
Forum Master


Joined: 07 Jun 2008
Posts: 2271
Local time: 7:18 PM

as.gif

PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:07 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quote:

Well our system is different then as we tend to bring our dead home to be buried


So do we.This practice only began with the Vietnam war,in Australia AND America.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> News Stories and Current Events All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Loans - Mortgage - Debt Consolidation - Bankruptcy - Magazine Subscriptions
phpBB SEO