| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mr_C
Reckoner
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 6756
Local time: 10:18 PM
Location: Pale Blue Dot
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:28 pm Post subject: Re: question re evolution |
  |
|
| WashMDJD wrote: | | I'd be curious, from the point of view of the person making such an argument, just how they objectively decided that the wolf had 'more' information than the chihuahua. How would they measure the 'information' that they claim exists in genetic material in order to make an ordinal comparison? |
Cuz teh wolf is bigger lulzzzz |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
baddogma
antitheist
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 9958
Local time: 1:18 PM
Location: Colorado
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:31 pm Post subject: Re: question re evolution |
|
|
| WashMDJD wrote: | | I'd be curious, from the point of view of the person making such an argument, just how they objectively decided that the wolf had 'more' information than the chihuahua. How would they measure the 'information' that they claim exists in genetic material in order to make an ordinal comparison? |
If that is the case then Chimps are MORE evolved than we are.
_________________
Join http://www.sefora.org/
Beamishboy: Let me tell you what the real pink unicorn is - it's the erroneous belief (based on atheistic faith) that Christians must be bound by the Bible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BarkAtTheMoon
O Captain, my Captain
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 5035
Local time: 12:18 AM
Location: Wilmington, DE
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:34 pm Post subject: Re: question re evolution |
|
|
| baddogma wrote: | | WashMDJD wrote: | | I'd be curious, from the point of view of the person making such an argument, just how they objectively decided that the wolf had 'more' information than the chihuahua. How would they measure the 'information' that they claim exists in genetic material in order to make an ordinal comparison? |
If that is the case then Chimps are MORE evolved than we are. |
In some cases? ......
_________________
"The very existence of flame throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, 'You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.' - George Carlin
"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Deep Thoughts by Jack Handey |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wickedtruth
Forum Master
Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 2216
Local time: 11:18 PM
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:35 pm Post subject: Re: question re evolution |
|
|
| BarkAtTheMoon wrote: | | baddogma wrote: | | WashMDJD wrote: | | I'd be curious, from the point of view of the person making such an argument, just how they objectively decided that the wolf had 'more' information than the chihuahua. How would they measure the 'information' that they claim exists in genetic material in order to make an ordinal comparison? |
If that is the case then Chimps are MORE evolved than we are. |
In some cases? ...... |
Ron perlman :X |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eyedunno
The Great JuJu at the Bottom of the Sea
Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 3815
Local time: 2:18 PM
Location: Cin City, OH!
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:45 pm Post subject: Re: question re evolution |
|
|
| baddogma wrote: | | WashMDJD wrote: | | I'd be curious, from the point of view of the person making such an argument, just how they objectively decided that the wolf had 'more' information than the chihuahua. How would they measure the 'information' that they claim exists in genetic material in order to make an ordinal comparison? |
If that is the case then Chimps are MORE evolved than we are. |
Well, chimps have an extra set of chromosomes and maybe a slightly larger genome.
But these guys are REALLY "evolved" (more than 35 times the size of the human genome):
Edit: Oh, and this guy's around 200 times "more evolved" than humans:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wickedtruth
Forum Master
Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 2216
Local time: 11:18 PM
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ron Perlman...missing link :X
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
baddogma
antitheist
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 9958
Local time: 1:18 PM
Location: Colorado
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:00 pm Post subject: Re: question re evolution |
|
|
| Wickedtruth wrote: | | BarkAtTheMoon wrote: | | baddogma wrote: | | WashMDJD wrote: | | I'd be curious, from the point of view of the person making such an argument, just how they objectively decided that the wolf had 'more' information than the chihuahua. How would they measure the 'information' that they claim exists in genetic material in order to make an ordinal comparison? |
If that is the case then Chimps are MORE evolved than we are. |
In some cases? ...... |
Ron perlman :X |
_________________
Join http://www.sefora.org/
Beamishboy: Let me tell you what the real pink unicorn is - it's the erroneous belief (based on atheistic faith) that Christians must be bound by the Bible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
josephpalazzo
Illusion Master
Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 8036
Local time: 11:18 PM
Location: D-brane
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:26 pm Post subject: Re: question re evolution |
|
|
| baddogma wrote: | | WashMDJD wrote: | | I'd be curious, from the point of view of the person making such an argument, just how they objectively decided that the wolf had 'more' information than the chihuahua. How would they measure the 'information' that they claim exists in genetic material in order to make an ordinal comparison? |
If that is the case then Chimps are MORE evolved than we are. |
And every T-rex was a monumental, humongus genius...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WashMDJD
Forum Leader
Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 794
Local time: 8:18 PM
Location: Everett/Seattle, WA
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:12 pm Post subject: Re: question re evolution |
|
|
| baddogma wrote: | | WashMDJD wrote: | | I'd be curious, from the point of view of the person making such an argument, just how they objectively decided that the wolf had 'more' information than the chihuahua. How would they measure the 'information' that they claim exists in genetic material in order to make an ordinal comparison? |
If that is the case then Chimps are MORE evolved than we are. |
Yeah, I mean, I understand how from a geneticist's perspective, one genome may contain the recipe for 'more' stuff (even if most of that genome's recipe codes for absolutely nothing that is activated).
But the creationist can't be basing his claim that the wolf has 'more' information off of genetics, can he? I mean, he wants to get to the proposition that the wolf has more so that he can say that the wolf was a prior form and due to the introduction of sin the genome is corrupting, hence it is going from 'more' perfection to 'less' perfection over time (due to the corrupting power of sin). However, I don't think that proposition can be even remotely supported with genetics - which means that if the creationist is making that claim about wolves and chihuahuas, he must either be begging the question and assuming that his "sin over time = 'less' information in a genome" starting position, or he must be measuring information in some fashion other than by looking at the numbers of chromosomes.
If he is looking at the information level in some fashion other than by counting chromosomes (in which case many plants have more information than we do), I am curious to hear what that methodology is like. If he cannot produce one that satisfies, it looks more and more like he was simply begging the question, in which case the response is, "Well, yes, I agree with you. If we accept your assumptions as a starting basis, then the wolf does have more information than the chihuahua, which is why the wolf could evolve into a chihuahua but not the other way around. However, since genetics observably doesn't work like that, we must question your assumption much more heavily or reject it outright." Then that opens up a nice opportunity to give a beautiful talk about inactive DNA, promoters, and 'nonsense' DNA that with a single addition error somewhere could start some little RNA molecules building peptide chains.
_________________
"Ne mea dona tibi studio disposta fideli,
Intellecta prius quam sint, contempta reliquas."
-Lucretius, De rerum natura
("...that my gifts here set forth for you with faithful solicitude, may not by you be contempuously discarded before they have been understood.")
"Mes amis, si j'avance, suivez-moi! Si je recule, tuez-moi! Si je meurs, vengez-moi!" --Henri de la Rochejaquelein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
monkeybyte
Forum Master
Joined: 04 Jan 2004
Posts: 3575
Local time: 2:18 PM
Location: At E's place for tea.
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:19 pm Post subject: Re: question re evolution |
|
|
[quote="Wickedtruth"] | BarkAtTheMoon wrote: |
Ron perlman :X |
I swear they gotta make this friggin' movie and they gotta put him in it. 
_________________
"Setting people on fire is wrong." -Todd "Squee" Casil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Live Video and Chat Room
Freethought Videos
FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Register
