The Infidel Guy Show
The Debate Hour Show

Faith and Freethought
3 Podcasts, One Feed

or visit this page.


FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MemberlistMemberlist    UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister   
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 VideoRoom and ChatLive Video and Chat Room   The Infidel Guy's Video RoomFreethought Videos
BlogsBlogs    My BlogWeblogs News


Embed Our Player

~ TIP JAR ~


Ask a Logician
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> Philosophy & Rhetoric General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Chaoslord2004
Philosopher & Logician


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 8427
Local time: 5:26 PM
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:39 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Wickedtruth wrote:
"And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into the *DOUCHE* fire:"


::Wicked plucks out an eye at the Douch man picture:: lol


thats pretty funny.
_________________
An artist sees beauty in a painting. I see beauty in a logical proof.

"All error is due to extraneous factors, reason itself does not err"
~Kurt Gödel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Mr_C
Reckoner


Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 6752
Local time: 4:26 PM
Location: Pale Blue Dot
us.gif

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:51 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Chaoslord2004 wrote:
Wickedtruth wrote:
"And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into the *DOUCHE* fire:"


::Wicked plucks out an eye at the Douch man picture:: lol


thats pretty funny.


Yes, but was it the truth?



...the wicked truth?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wickedtruth
Forum Master
Forum Master


Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 2211
Local time: 5:26 PM

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:31 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Mr_C wrote:
Chaoslord2004 wrote:
Wickedtruth wrote:
"And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into the *DOUCHE* fire:"


::Wicked plucks out an eye at the Douch man picture:: lol


thats pretty funny.


Yes, but was it the truth?



...the wicked truth?




Yeah..I think I chose the wrong moniker when I joined this forum. Shoulda went with "GoofyTruth" or "Loadedtruth" or sumtin like dat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
josephpalazzo
Illusion Master


Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 8036
Local time: 5:26 PM
Location: D-brane

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:05 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Since no one attempted my logic problem (5 houses, 5 nationalities,...), you can pm me for the answers. I know, you klutzes are too shy to give a wrong answer for fear of me really making you look bad, hah.

Here's the famous Cretan liar paradox:

Epimenides, a Cretan, said: "All Cretans are liars." Is it true or false?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog
Chaoslord2004
Philosopher & Logician


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 8427
Local time: 5:26 PM
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:38 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

josephpalazzo wrote:
Since no one attempted my logic problem (5 houses, 5 nationalities,...), you can pm me for the answers. I know, you klutzes are too shy to give a wrong answer for fear of me really making you look bad, hah.

Here's the famous Cretan liar paradox:

Epimenides, a Cretan, said: "All Cretans are liars." Is it true or false?


I've actually done work on the liar paradox. The solution I advocate is what I call the "parametric solution to the liar." This solution solves all variants of the liar paradox. Basically, it says all propositions are conjunctions, on proposition asserting P and the other asserting T(P). The liar becomes simply false, not T <--> F.
_________________
An artist sees beauty in a painting. I see beauty in a logical proof.

"All error is due to extraneous factors, reason itself does not err"
~Kurt Gödel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Philosophos
When we look at you, we see an asshole


Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9299
Local time: 5:26 PM
Location: In ur body cast

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 1:13 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Chaoslord2004 wrote:
Basically, it says all propositions are conjunctions, on proposition asserting P and the other asserting T(P). The liar becomes simply false, not T <--> F.

All propositions are conjunctions? Yikes. I saw that solution before, but am too lazy to look it up. I presume you mean a conjuction with something like the following: "and that's true".

So, any proposition's best analyzed by the following: for all propositions X, we need to analyze that stuff as "X and "X is true"".

Is that what you're getting at?

Cuz... if so... that shit's wrong.
_________________
Ass!
Hole!
Ass!
Hole!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
josephpalazzo
Illusion Master


Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 8036
Local time: 5:26 PM
Location: D-brane

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 2:29 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Chaoslord2004 wrote:
josephpalazzo wrote:
Since no one attempted my logic problem (5 houses, 5 nationalities,...), you can pm me for the answers. I know, you klutzes are too shy to give a wrong answer for fear of me really making you look bad, hah.

Here's the famous Cretan liar paradox:

Epimenides, a Cretan, said: "All Cretans are liars." Is it true or false?


I've actually done work on the liar paradox. The solution I advocate is what I call the "parametric solution to the liar." This solution solves all variants of the liar paradox. Basically, it says all propositions are conjunctions, on proposition asserting P and the other asserting T(P). The liar becomes simply false, not T <--> F.


Very good answer. Obviously, the proposition, "All Cretans are liars," is false, that is, some Cretans do tell the truth sometimes, and Epimenides is a fucking liar.


Now, what about this:


"This statement is false."

Is it true or false?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog
Chaoslord2004
Philosopher & Logician


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 8427
Local time: 5:26 PM
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:30 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Philosophos wrote:
Chaoslord2004 wrote:
Basically, it says all propositions are conjunctions, on proposition asserting P and the other asserting T(P). The liar becomes simply false, not T <--> F.

All propositions are conjunctions? Yikes. I saw that solution before, but am too lazy to look it up. I presume you mean a conjuction with something like the following: "and that's true".

So, any proposition's best analyzed by the following: for all propositions X, we need to analyze that stuff as "X and "X is true"".

Is that what you're getting at?

Cuz... if so... that shit's wrong.


I'm not sure its the right solution anymore. Not much work, before me, has been done on it. However, I did demonstrate that it solved ALL variants of the Liar...even Yablo's paradox. It is a pretty wacky solution.
_________________
An artist sees beauty in a painting. I see beauty in a logical proof.

"All error is due to extraneous factors, reason itself does not err"
~Kurt Gödel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
rickcopeland648
The Phantom Teabagger


Joined: 09 Sep 2005
Posts: 3064
Local time: 10:26 PM

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:36 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Chaos,
Can you please list what you think is an essential course in logic? By that The Rick Copeland does not mean an undergrad couse (but please do that as well. He'd like that greatly) but just enough to see through the bullshit. In short, a series of books regarding critical thinking...
_________________
“I think it’s also important for the President to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn.”
-- George W. Bush on Clinton's involvement in Kosovo, 1999

"Syphilis is the algebra of infection."

(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
Can't... fight... any... longer... must.. help.. bunny.. achieve.. global.. domination.. All.. hail... bunny...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chaoslord2004
Philosopher & Logician


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 8427
Local time: 5:26 PM
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:38 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

josephpalazzo wrote:
Chaoslord2004 wrote:
josephpalazzo wrote:
Since no one attempted my logic problem (5 houses, 5 nationalities,...), you can pm me for the answers. I know, you klutzes are too shy to give a wrong answer for fear of me really making you look bad, hah.

Here's the famous Cretan liar paradox:

Epimenides, a Cretan, said: "All Cretans are liars." Is it true or false?


I've actually done work on the liar paradox. The solution I advocate is what I call the "parametric solution to the liar." This solution solves all variants of the liar paradox. Basically, it says all propositions are conjunctions, on proposition asserting P and the other asserting T(P). The liar becomes simply false, not T <--> F.


Very good answer. Obviously, the proposition, "All Cretans are liars," is false, that is, some Cretans do tell the truth sometimes, and Epimenides is a fucking liar.


Now, what about this:


"This statement is false."

Is it true or false?


Let me post the proof:

1. T(L) [assumption for reductio]

2. T(L) & F(L) [equivalent to 1 on PTP view]

3. L ^ ~L [from (2) and exclusive bivalence]

Therefore,

4. F(L) [reductio]

1. F(L) [assumption]

2. ~L [from 1]

3. ~(T(L) & F(L)) [equivalent to (2) on PTP view]

4. ~T(L) or ~F(L) [equivalent to 3]

5. F(L) or T(L) [equivalent to 4 and exclusive bivalence]

6. ~T(L) [equivalent to 1 modulo exclusive bivalence]

Therefore,

7. F(L) [disjunctive syllogism: 5, 6]

We have, in fact, a proof given my solution to the liar that it is just false. Unlike other solutions, this ALSO solves ALL strengthened versions.
_________________
An artist sees beauty in a painting. I see beauty in a logical proof.

"All error is due to extraneous factors, reason itself does not err"
~Kurt Gödel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Chaoslord2004
Philosopher & Logician


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 8427
Local time: 5:26 PM
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:44 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

rickcopeland648 wrote:
Chaos,
Can you please list what you think is an essential course in logic? By that The Rick Copeland does not mean an undergrad couse (but please do that as well. He'd like that greatly) but just enough to see through the bullshit. In short, a series of books regarding critical thinking...


If you're more interested in critical thinking, I can't think of a better book than this one:



I know the cover is stupid...

Now, if your more interested in the logic, Irving M. Copi and Carl Cohen's Introduction to Logic is ideal:



Are you looking for more advanced material? What are your primary interest in logic?
_________________
An artist sees beauty in a painting. I see beauty in a logical proof.

"All error is due to extraneous factors, reason itself does not err"
~Kurt Gödel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Wickedtruth
Forum Master
Forum Master


Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 2211
Local time: 5:26 PM

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:48 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Chaoslord2004 wrote:
What are your primary interest in logic?




He thinks it will impress the chicks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rickcopeland648
The Phantom Teabagger


Joined: 09 Sep 2005
Posts: 3064
Local time: 10:26 PM

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:49 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Perhaps a bit more. The Rick Copeland has read both of those...
_________________
“I think it’s also important for the President to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn.”
-- George W. Bush on Clinton's involvement in Kosovo, 1999

"Syphilis is the algebra of infection."

(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)
Can't... fight... any... longer... must.. help.. bunny.. achieve.. global.. domination.. All.. hail... bunny...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chaoslord2004
Philosopher & Logician


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 8427
Local time: 5:26 PM
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:49 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Wickedtruth wrote:
Chaoslord2004 wrote:
What are your primary interest in logic?




He thinks it will impress the chicks.


Laughing
_________________
An artist sees beauty in a painting. I see beauty in a logical proof.

"All error is due to extraneous factors, reason itself does not err"
~Kurt Gödel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Philosophos
When we look at you, we see an asshole


Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9299
Local time: 5:26 PM
Location: In ur body cast

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:49 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

How To Think About Weird Things kicks serious fucking ass. That's one hell of a book.
_________________
Ass!
Hole!
Ass!
Hole!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> Philosophy & Rhetoric General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 8 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Credit Cards Help - Deaf - Credit Cards - Ultimate Credit Card Guide - Problem Mortgage
phpBB SEO