| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
xena Forum Master


Joined: 20 May 2008 Posts: 2384 Local time: 8:34 AM Location: Wales

|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9928 Local time: 4:34 PM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Once you have a working understanding of evolution you do not need faith, the evidence is everywhere. Every argument the creationist has fails miserably. The only argument they have is from personal ignorance and blind faith. Maybe you should not confront her about it and just ask questions. Ask about endogenous retrovirus insertions, broken vitimin C gene, Vestigial organs, why there is not one layer of rock with every living creature in it. When presented with questions it forces them to think, when confronted with "facts" they run. _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9928 Local time: 4:34 PM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd be interested to hear the theist arguments. The most common are:
1. We have not found any transitional fossils
2. DNA supports a creator not evolution.
3. Life is too complex to have come about by CHANCE!
4. Vestigial organs are not VESTIGIAL, THEY HAVE A FUNCTION!
5. things evolve to a POINT......
6. the bible saiz!
best arguments FOR evolution.
1. it is a solid scientific theory that has not been falsified.
2. Broken vitamin C gene common with apes.
3. endogenous retrovirus insertions. is god a liar?
4. transitional fossils, layering, sorting. How if not over millions of years?.
5. vestigial organs. They may have a use, they may have a NEW use, they are still vestiges of a organ used by an ancestor.
Any better arguments on either side? _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 2:34 AM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| baddogma wrote: | I'd be interested to hear the theist arguments. The most common are:
1. We have not found any transitional fossils
2. DNA supports a creator not evolution.
3. Life is too complex to have come about by CHANCE!
4. Vestigial organs are not VESTIGIAL, THEY HAVE A FUNCTION!
5. things evolve to a POINT......
6. the bible saiz!
best arguments FOR evolution.
1. it is a solid scientific theory that has not been falsified.
2. Broken vitamin C gene common with apes.
3. endogenous retrovirus insertions. is god a liar?
4. transitional fossils, layering, sorting. How if not over millions of years?.
5. vestigial organs. They may have a use, they may have a NEW use, they are still vestiges of a organ used by an ancestor.
Any better arguments on either side? |
One comment on 1. it is a solid scientific theory that has not been falsified.
Evolution can be falsified, why it is a good theory. There is a distinction between something being wrong, and something that can be falsified: Falsify means there is the possibility to find evidence that can make the theory wrong. Example, finding dinosaur bones in the Precambrian eon would make the theory of evolution wrong. OTOH, Freud's theory of psychoanalysis could not be falsified, the very reason Popper objected to it and devised the falsification test. Freud's theory was eventually abandoned, and Popper's falsification test is now a standard gauge in the formation of scientific theory. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9928 Local time: 4:34 PM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly, Evolution is a very fragile theory considering the amount of fossils out there. All it would take is ONE out of place to falsify it. For example, if humans fossils were found with dinosaurs. Game over, the theory is shot.
Of course they are found all the time together....it is a mass conspiracy to cover it up. _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xena Forum Master


Joined: 20 May 2008 Posts: 2384 Local time: 8:34 AM Location: Wales

|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
sadly, I can guarantee on hearing the phrase 'but it's all guess work' and 'no scientists agree on any one thing'
When asking for evidence for her god, I always get 'you wouldn't understand. It's faith I have within me and you just don't get it and you never will' or she has been a tad more cruel, 'what are you then? what are you without a belief?'
Like it's sad or something............ahh-bollocks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9928 Local time: 4:34 PM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| xena wrote: | sadly, I can guarantee on hearing the phrase 'but it's all guess work' and 'no scientists agree on any one thing'
When asking for evidence for her god, I always get 'you wouldn't understand. It's faith I have within me and you just don't get it and you never will' or she has been a tad more cruel, 'what are you then? what are you without a belief?'
Like it's sad or something............ahh-bollocks. |
Ask her what they do not agree on. There are only a handful of scientists that dismiss evolution, even less in the biology field. They may disagree on some of the workings of evolution like sudden change or millions of years, but there are very few that do not agree macro evolution is a fact.
It is not all guess work. It is a testable theory. It so far has stood up to all the tests. Faith is an entirely different subject. Faith needs no evidence or it shines in the face of contradicting evidence. _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 2:34 AM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| xena wrote: | 'no scientists agree on any one thing'
|
LOL.
Heck, theists disagree on what the bible actually says... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xena Forum Master


Joined: 20 May 2008 Posts: 2384 Local time: 8:34 AM Location: Wales

|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good point...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kmisho Stochastic

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 4811 Local time: 5:34 PM Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| StrawDog wrote: | | Basilosaur wrote: | | How can the christians dismiss a theory that they don't even understand? |
Most have no desire to understand it, as they already 'know' that it is wrong. |
Yeah. But if they used their frickin brains and the eyes "god gave them" they wouldn't have the problem of "knowing" bullshit. _________________ K Michau
Now this religion happens to prevail/Until by that one it is overthrown/Because men dare not live with men alone/But always with another fairy tale.
al-Ma'arri, Syrian Poet, died 1057
You deny the existence of 999 alleged Gods. I merely deny one more - yours.
John MacKinnon Robertson, "Godism" 1896
"Never is a long time." Robert Fripp, 1998
Poetry, Art, Music |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kmisho Stochastic

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 4811 Local time: 5:34 PM Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | but it's all guess work | really? we just lucked into landing on the moon and curing polio?
| Quote: | | no scientists agree on any one thing | patently false
| Quote: | | you wouldn't understand. It's faith I have within me and you just don't get it and you never will | if you yourself understood, you could explain it. YOU don't understand.
| Quote: | | what are you then? what are you without a belief? | if I don't believe the same things you do, that means I have no belief at all? bigot... _________________ K Michau
Now this religion happens to prevail/Until by that one it is overthrown/Because men dare not live with men alone/But always with another fairy tale.
al-Ma'arri, Syrian Poet, died 1057
You deny the existence of 999 alleged Gods. I merely deny one more - yours.
John MacKinnon Robertson, "Godism" 1896
"Never is a long time." Robert Fripp, 1998
Poetry, Art, Music |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xena Forum Master


Joined: 20 May 2008 Posts: 2384 Local time: 8:34 AM Location: Wales

|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rortykiller Forum Leader

Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Posts: 740 Local time: 2:34 AM
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| baddogma wrote: | Exactly, Evolution is a very fragile theory considering the amount of fossils out there. All it would take is ONE out of place to falsify it. For example, if humans fossils were found with dinosaurs. Game over, the theory is shot.
Of course they are found all the time together....it is a mass conspiracy to cover it up. |
You make it seem easy. Evolution is NOT a fragile theory in the least. In fact, its one of the most complexly reinforced theories in biology. The "fragility" you speak of is a biological impossibility, which is exactly why the theory has withheld a century of criticism from the craziest theists they could throw at it. _________________ "rights" are the modern recontextualizing of "holy"; a romanticized state of being beyond reproach. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9928 Local time: 4:34 PM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rortykiller wrote: | | baddogma wrote: | Exactly, Evolution is a very fragile theory considering the amount of fossils out there. All it would take is ONE out of place to falsify it. For example, if humans fossils were found with dinosaurs. Game over, the theory is shot.
Of course they are found all the time together....it is a mass conspiracy to cover it up. |
You make it seem easy. Evolution is NOT a fragile theory in the least. In fact, its one of the most complexly reinforced theories in biology. The "fragility" you speak of is a biological impossibility, which is exactly why the theory has withheld a century of criticism from the craziest theists they could throw at it. |
Yup....I agree, but it IS falsifiable, it just hasn't been. _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rortykiller Forum Leader

Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Posts: 740 Local time: 2:34 AM
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess if you want to think about things as Right and Wrong or something ridiculous. But in your dichotomous paradigm you actually propose that to disprove one aspect of evolution would ruin the whole thing. Of course, as a pragmatist, you wouldn't be making any such point. Its completely obvious that even if a part of evolution was disproved the theory could easy continue to help you to better cope with your environment.
And that is a fact, evolution's utility was in motion far before it ever got proven, and since it has been proven has not seized inspiring brilliant changes to the field of biology as well as other natural sciences. _________________ "rights" are the modern recontextualizing of "holy"; a romanticized state of being beyond reproach. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|