| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Philosophos
When we look at you, we see an asshole
Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9299
Local time: 4:02 AM
Location: In ur body cast
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: |
  |
|
| Gettin' In Tune wrote: | | I can easily plug the data into STATA and run a regression analysis, but what is the hypothesis? |
If I had the data, I'd probably just run a calculation for covariance. I'm not looking for a specific model.
_________________
Ass!
Hole!
Ass!
Hole! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
Gettin' In Tune
Forum Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 2678
Local time: 4:02 AM
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The covariance between year and taxes? What would that tell you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Philosophos
When we look at you, we see an asshole
Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9299
Local time: 4:02 AM
Location: In ur body cast
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gettin' In Tune wrote: | | The covariance between year and taxes? What would that tell you? |
Mmmm...
No, not the covariance between the year and taxes. The covariance between my chosen measure of economic prosperity and "tax burden" (and that's what I'm seeking - a reasonable measure of the latter variable).
_________________
Ass!
Hole!
Ass!
Hole! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gettin' In Tune
Forum Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 2678
Local time: 4:02 AM
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Philosophos wrote: | | The covariance between my chosen measure of economic prosperity and "tax burden" (and that's what I'm seeking - a reasonable measure of the latter variable). |
How would you intertemporally weight economic prosperity? IOW, how would you measure and compare economic prosperity in the 19th century compared to the 21st century? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gettin' In Tune
Forum Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 2678
Local time: 4:02 AM
|
| Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You may want to check out this paper, particularly table 11.2. I do not think you are going to find studies of the historical tax burdens in the US as terms of GDP going back before 1929, but I could be wrong: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5981.pdf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr_C
Reckoner
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 6752
Local time: 3:02 AM
Location: Pale Blue Dot
|
| Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gettin' In Tune wrote: | | You may want to check out this paper, particularly table 11.2. I do not think you are going to find studies of the historical tax burdens in the US as terms of GDP going back before 1929, but I could be wrong: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5981.pdf |
Table 11.2 ftw!!
Pages 8 & 9 btw.
Now if it were just adjusted for inflation...
_________________
"If we long to believe that the stars rise and set for us, that we are the reason there is a Universe, does science do us a disservice in deflating our conceits?"
Carl Sagan
The Atheist Forums Rules
Summary: Just play nice, mmkay? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gettin' In Tune
Forum Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 2678
Local time: 4:02 AM
|
| Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr_C wrote: | | Now if it were just adjusted for inflation... |
Don't be a dumbass. I'll try to answer your economic questions, but your issue with their methodology?
I'd suggest contacting themselves directly, NBER. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr_C
Reckoner
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 6752
Local time: 3:02 AM
Location: Pale Blue Dot
|
| Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gettin' In Tune wrote: | | Mr_C wrote: | | Now if it were just adjusted for inflation... |
Don't be a dumbass. I'll try to answer your economic questions, but your issue with their methodology?
I'd suggest contacting themselves directly, NBER. |
...I was complementing your find and I made an observation and get called a dumbass. Nice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moloth
Fateless
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23105
Local time: 4:02 AM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
|
| Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr_C wrote: | | Gettin' In Tune wrote: | | Mr_C wrote: | | Now if it were just adjusted for inflation... |
Don't be a dumbass. I'll try to answer your economic questions, but your issue with their methodology?
I'd suggest contacting themselves directly, NBER. |
...I was complementing your find and I made an observation and get called a dumbass. Nice. |
its better than being a fickle twatwaffle...
oh... heh. sorry. 
_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-
www.Moloth.com
Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ChrissyFos
Lobal Dominatrix
Joined: 08 Dec 2005
Posts: 5315
Local time: 4:02 AM
Location: Here, There and Everywhere
|
| Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anything is better than being Mr_Chaz. I would consider dumbass to be a complimentative stretch.
_________________
This space is reserved for inarticulate meat puppets who have no true perspective outside the refuge of quotation marks.
Reverend Mother
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Knight_of_BAAWA
Jedi Slackmaster
Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 10021
Local time: 3:02 AM
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps he's more akin to a Candiru, aka the Dickfish (tm) (for those who remember that IG show).
_________________
aa #51, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gettin' In Tune
Forum Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 2678
Local time: 4:02 AM
|
| Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr_C wrote: | | ...I was complementing your find and I made an observation and get called a dumbass. Nice. |
oh. thanks and sorry. What is your observation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Live Video and Chat Room
Freethought Videos
FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Register
