| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PJS

Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 833 Local time: 2:50 PM Location: Clearwater,Fl.
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To Al Capone:
The American philosopher and atheist John Dewey wrote a short book called A Common Faith based on lectures he gave at Yale in 1934. Before you get too far into your endeavor you may want to give it a read. _________________ The path of least resistance and least trouble is a mental rut already made. It requires troublesome work to undertake the alternation of old beliefs.
-John Dewey
Last edited by PJS on Wed May 14, 2008 2:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
BarkAtTheMoon O Captain, my Captain

Joined: 20 Dec 2004 Posts: 4348 Local time: 2:50 PM Location: Wilmington, DE

|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Al'Capone wrote: | Actually the smileys are here because I think we have to take things with distance. I am just a small thing, but I try to take it joyfully. I don't feel like a coward, I simply have no idea where the universe is going to, it's why I am agnostic: there might be something we can call God, if only we don't expect what we created ourselves. I tolerate quite well atheists, you should tolerate agnostics .
I am answering like that, and created open deity because it seems that there are only three choices: 2000 years old beliefs (or likely), atheism or agnosticism. In my opinion, the existing religions are just too old, so why not create new ones, based on atheism and agnosticism (and change the meaning of it too). I do not ask you to follow the idea, or even to visit the page, I just offer the idea to you: why not simply say that the religions are too old, and define our owns. I tried also to write something which is against beliefs (and so faith): that's exactly what lead to agnosticism AND atheism. That's an essay, I am not asking you to agree (actually I am asking you to not believe in it, at least). I might be wrong, but I am trying.
The main idea is that the actual universe is interesting enough to be lived without human-made god. But I am agnostic, still, sorry about that! |
Then why bother with a religion at all? _________________ "The very existence of flame throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, 'You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.' - George Carlin
"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Deep Thoughts by Jack Handey |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tinker683 Extremely Boring

Joined: 13 Mar 2003 Posts: 902 Local time: 1:50 PM Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Azathoth wrote: | Thanks for the help I got, from the people who were helpful.
To the rest of you: It's obvious that I can't go on an atheist forum and expect a lot of puppies and kittens for asking about religious conversion. On the other hand, telling me that you won't feel bad if I abandon logic and reason and go for blind faith is insulting and seems to be missing the point of a lot of what was in my original post.
I'm thinking about it and doing a lot of reading from both sides of the line. I haven't converted yet because I haven't seen a reason to. If I see a reason to, I will, otherwise, I won't.
What I'm doing is stopping my old habit of assuming all the Christian stuff I read is wrong, and all the atheistic stuff I've read is right. I'm just trying to weigh each one on its own merits, ignoring utopians on both sides, and trying to figure out what's what.
|
Good luck on your journey then. You shouldn't ever look at something and say, "Oh well this is from [X] source so I should immediately think it's wrong." I'd think that a better way to judge things is to read through it and see if it stands on it's own merits.
| Azathoth wrote: | | btw pancakes taste best if you beat the batter like hell right before you pour it in to the pan, use a little olive oil instead of butter, and only turn them once. |
Olive oil instead of butter!?!?!?!?!? You would actually remove butter from pancaking goodness???????
Savage. _________________ "Not everything that steps out of line, and thus 'abnormal', must necessarily be 'inferior'" - Hans Asperger, 1938 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jutter Quixotic Cloggy

Joined: 26 Jul 2003 Posts: 6382 Local time: 7:50 PM Location: Den Helder, the Netherlands

|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's one thing I've never understood about the "god(s) might exist"- middle ground...
...isn't god supposedly a special exception, where trivialities like 'possiblity'needn't apply? Isn't god supposedly miraculous, SUPERnatural? It exists without having to exist in the sense of you and I and everything around us existing.
With theism, aren't we (in general) dealing with a train of thought that goes beyond proposing the mere possibility of the existence of some entity? This is a deity we're talking about; a boldface fuck you in the face of the guidelines we've come to define "possibility" by. God exists even though he never could (disclaimer; by human/earthly/natural/blabla standards). God might exist? Nevermind "might".
I'm increasingly growing to think that agnosticism an underestimation of how nonsensical theism is. _________________ ~ Let us be reasonable ~
*You want to claim there's such a thing as the "supernatural"? Fine. I hereby declare that proposition "paracorrect".
*"If there were nobody listening to gods anymore, there would be nothing left for us to do, then to finally start listening to each other."
*As any gamer will tell you: God-mode is a cheat-code.
Last edited by Jutter on Wed May 14, 2008 2:25 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moloth Coin Operated Boy

Joined: 27 Aug 2003 Posts: 21260 Local time: 1:50 PM Location: Warner Robins, GA

|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jutter wrote: | | I'm increasingly growing to think that agnosticism an underestimation of how nonsensical theism is? |
i think you're on the right track. _________________ -=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-
www.Moloth.com
www.twitter.com/Moloth
www.MySpace.com/Moloth
www.last.fm/user/moloth
Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
_Frost Visitor


Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 20 Local time: 1:50 PM
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
technically, the search for meaning and truth is the most important thing one can desire in life. So don't give up on it, and please don't wave things away with witty pot-shots, which never help any cause (because I see this all the time, and it reeks).
I hate to say, but searching for answers on the Bible in a world gone dumb may be difficult. Lack of critical knowledge abounds, so you may find yourself somewhat alone. But do not ever forget this: the Bible is a composite of ancient literature. If you try to read it the way you might read the literature from your English classes, you will rob yourself of what it is trying to say. The insane thing is that so many pastors and Christians do this, thus promoting ignorance of the Bible's true meaning (that is, every author has a specific audience and a specific message, and uses devices to convey meaning. these devices and their context are radically different form the ones we use today). Is that not ironic? It is not so much that Christianity follows ignorance, it's simply that ignorance has that much power to corrupt people, and it very easily infects people who ignore critical study.
Who would have thought that the book of Revelation was written to Christians suffering persecution during the reign of Domitian, and concerns events during that time? (the seven headed beast stands for the seven hills of Rome, for one of many examples)
Who'd have thought that by occupational definition, the scribes who wrote Genesis knew of the Gilgamesh epic and the Near Easter flood stories? (But do you think they intended to create a false religion? Or did they simply make a strong theological statement by writing a story in some way contrary to the ones of the surrounding nations?)
Who would have thought that the purpose of the dietary laws in Leviticus were meant to separate the Israelites via eating customs from other nations, so as to avoid syncretism until the coming of the Messiah?
Literary devices...the implied meaning of the numbers 40, 7, and 3...symoblism...the reordering of events to emphasize a particular feature..."inclusio" structure...you just have to want it. And if you remain an atheist...so be it! You will at least know how to analyze ancient literature instead of just throwing your hand out and saying "fairytales!"
If you feel like reading, let me suggest Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament, and Elements of Biblical Exegesis. And, if you're really looking for it, there are plenty of scholarly assessments of Jesus out there.And it never hurts to purchase a few monographs on subjects such as Myth. Just don't be bound by the quick and simple. _________________ Ecclesiastes 7:23-25
All this I have tested by wisdom; I said, "I will be wise," but it was far from me. That which is, is far off, and deep, very deep; who can find it out? I turned my mind to know and to search out and to seek wisdom and the sum of things, and to know that wickedness is folly and that foolishness is madness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|