The Infidel Guy Show
The Debate Hour Show

Faith and Freethought
3 Podcasts, One Feed

or visit this page.


FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MemberlistMemberlist    UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister   
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 VideoRoom and ChatLive Video and Chat Room   The Infidel Guy's Video RoomFreethought Videos
BlogsBlogs    My BlogWeblogs News


Embed Our Player

~ TIP JAR ~


Piri Reis map

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> History General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Siderius
Forum Plebian
Forum Plebian


Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Posts: 146
Local time: 8:07 PM

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:30 pm    Post subject: Piri Reis map Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I stumbled upon this map, and started to read about it. There are many claims that it shows antarctica shoreline without the ice. But they also mention that it is 9000 years ago since antarctica was without ice. Prof. Charles H. Hapgood of Keene College claims that this shows that civilization did not start at 4000 BC but is far older, and that there was a worldwide civilization that was advanced compared to that time.

What I am looking for is reliable information about the autenticity of this map. And also maybe some critical study of it, I am not quite convinced that it actually shows antarctica but maybe something that is similar?

If it is real doesnt it show that civilization is older than 4000BC as is generaly accepted today?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
greyghost
Annoyingly Addicting


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 1252
Local time: 9:07 PM
Location: Earth, Milky way, Universe

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Piri Reis map Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Siderius wrote:
I stumbled upon this map, and started to read about it. There are many claims that it shows antarctica shoreline without the ice. But they also mention that it is 9000 years ago since antarctica was without ice. Prof. Charles H. Hapgood of Keene College claims that this shows that civilization did not start at 4000 BC but is far older, and that there was a worldwide civilization that was advanced compared to that time.

What I am looking for is reliable information about the autenticity of this map. And also maybe some critical study of it, I am not quite convinced that it actually shows antarctica but maybe something that is similar?

If it is real doesnt it show that civilization is older than 4000BC as is generaly accepted today?


A link would help.
_________________
"There is no such uncertainty, as a sure thing."-Robert Burns

"A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be."-Albert Einstein

"Patriotism is the willingness to kill and be killed for trivial reasons."-Bertrand Russell

"I want someone to quote me in their signature. That's why I'm a pandering whore."-CET

New blog entry- 11/03/08
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Blog Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Moloth
Fateless


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23105
Local time: 8:07 PM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
us.gif

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:35 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

well, the Agricultural Revolution (humans settling) is thought to have begun soon after the end of the last Ice Age, about 15,000 years ago.

Humans HAVE had civilization longer than 6,000 years.

link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Revolution
_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-

www.Moloth.com

Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total


Last edited by Moloth on Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Gerard
Worshipper of the Solstice


Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 4072
Local time: 1:07 AM
Location: Groningen, the Netherlands
nl.gif

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:36 pm    Post subject: antarctica Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

From what I've heard the map is authentic but the claim that is shows the shoreline of Antarctica without the ice in any remotely accurate way is nonsense. But hey, if Von Däniken writes that stuff, who's gonna actually check anyway?

Gerard
_________________
The Historical Atlas of Europe

But as man exists in nature, I am not authorized to say that his formation, is above the power of nature.
Paul Henri Thiry Baron d' Holbach, (1723-1789)

Not collecting stamps is my hobby.
Gerard, (1962-*)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gerard
Worshipper of the Solstice


Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 4072
Local time: 1:07 AM
Location: Groningen, the Netherlands
nl.gif

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:49 pm    Post subject: ah, found something Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote



Quote:
Above is a map of South America and Antarctica with the Piri Reis coastline in magenta. Southern South America and Antarctica are in the orthographic projection - in other words they do look like they would as seen from space. We can see the Piri Reis Map bears no resemblance at all to Antarctica. The 600-mile wide Drake Passage is not shown, nor are the large islands in the Weddell Sea. The latitude is thousands of miles off.




from:

http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/PiriRies.HTM

Gerard
_________________
The Historical Atlas of Europe

But as man exists in nature, I am not authorized to say that his formation, is above the power of nature.
Paul Henri Thiry Baron d' Holbach, (1723-1789)

Not collecting stamps is my hobby.
Gerard, (1962-*)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Siderius
Forum Plebian
Forum Plebian


Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Posts: 146
Local time: 8:07 PM

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:52 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

I had planned on linking this in the opening post.

http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm

Sorry hehe

Moloth wrote:
well, the Agricultural Revolution (humans settling) is thought to have begun soon after the end of the last Ice Age, about 15,000 years ago.

Humans HAVE had civilization longer than 6,000 years.

link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Revolution


Do you think this agricultural civilization could have made a map of south america africa and antarctica?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Siderius
Forum Plebian
Forum Plebian


Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Posts: 146
Local time: 8:07 PM

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:56 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Gerard wrote:
From what I've heard the map is authentic but the claim that is shows the shoreline of Antarctica without the ice in any remotely accurate way is nonsense. But hey, if Von Däniken writes that stuff, who's gonna actually check anyway?

Gerard


If it was Däniken who said it I would have disregarded it much much sooner, but the claims from people who 'should' be more reliable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Moloth
Fateless


Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23105
Local time: 8:07 PM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
us.gif

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:00 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Siderius wrote:
I had planned on linking this in the opening post.

http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm

Sorry hehe

Moloth wrote:
well, the Agricultural Revolution (humans settling) is thought to have begun soon after the end of the last Ice Age, about 15,000 years ago.

Humans HAVE had civilization longer than 6,000 years.

link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Revolution


Do you think this agricultural civilization could have made a map of south america africa and antarctica?



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piri_Reis_Map

Quote:
Antarctica

Scholars believe the resemblance of the coastline to the actual coast of Antarctica to be tenuous. For centuries before the actual discovery of Antarctica, cartographers had been depicting a massive southern landmass on global maps based on the theoretical assumption by Europeans that one must exist, if only to balance the landmass of the North. The landmass in question on the Piri Reis map would thus be simply a continuation of this tradition, with its debatable resemblance to the actual coastline being coincidental. It was widely believed that South America and, once its northern coastline was discovered, Australia, must be joined to this land mass, which was thought to be very much bigger than the real Antarctica. This theoretical southern continent, the Great Southern Land or Terra Australis Incognita (literally Unknown Southern Land), in various configurations, was usually shown on maps until the eighteenth century.

An alternate view is that the "Antarctic" coast is simply the eastern coastline of South America skewed to align east-west due to the inaccurate measurement of longtitude or to fit it on the page.[1] Close examination of the coastline supports this view, revealing depictions of the basins at the mouth of the Strait of Magellan and the Falkland Islands.[2] The annotations on the map itself, stating that this region is hot and inhabited by large snakes do not fit with the likely climate and fauna in Antarctica in the 1500s. Similarly the map states that "spring comes early" to the islands off the coast, which is true of the Falkland Islands but not of any islands close to the Antarctic mainland.

Hapgood suggests that the Antarctic section of the map was copied at an incorrect scale to the rest of the map and resulted in the distortion and enlargement of the continent on several ancient maps. This would explain why there is no waterway between South America and Antarctica. He suggests several points of continuity between the Piri Reis Map and modern maps of the continent below the ice caps. Since the Antarctic continent was not officially sighted until 1820 and its full coastline was not known until much later, this claim, if true, would require major revisions to the history of exploration.[3]

_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-

www.Moloth.com

Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mr_C
Reckoner


Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 6752
Local time: 7:07 PM
Location: Pale Blue Dot
us.gif

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:54 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Thanks for posting that, Moloth. I did some reading on the subject before I opened this thread from a web site that also endorsed numerology, so a balanced, skeptical approach was like a breath of fresh air.
_________________
"If we long to believe that the stars rise and set for us, that we are the reason there is a Universe, does science do us a disservice in deflating our conceits?"
Carl Sagan




The Atheist Forums Rules
Summary: Just play nice, mmkay?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> History General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
The eBay Song - Debt Consolidation - Cell Phones - Mortgage Calculator - Libros recomendados
phpBB SEO