| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Castaa Forum Master


Joined: 17 Aug 2005 Posts: 2305 Local time: 1:25 PM Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:24 pm Post subject: Should the candidates debate science knowledge/policy? |
|
|
| Quote: | Matthew Chapman's suggestion that the presidential candidates have a debate on science is naive, idealistic, and a step in the right direction. It will never happen, because the issues of science we could talk about are not up for debate, and I don't think any of the candidates in any party are competent to discuss them, and they know it. They won't step into a venue where their grade-school level understanding of science will face serious challenge, or where their embarrassing misunderstandings will be publicly aired.
Now what would be feasible, I think, would be a debate on science policy. |
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/11/a_presidential_debate_on_scien.php
I, of course, love either of these ideas. No leader of the one of the most technologically advanced nations should have poor knowledge of the issues confronting science in America. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Azrael Celestial Teapotist

Joined: 23 Jul 2007 Posts: 540 Local time: 4:25 PM

|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I certainly hope the next president at least believes in Evolution. _________________ I'm not insane, at least that's what the voices in my head tell me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RyanDzundza Sock Puppet

Joined: 19 Sep 2007 Posts: 5296 Local time: 9:25 PM Location: Manchester

|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its probs best not to hear what he thinks about science lol
i always laugh when i hear george 'dubbya' doesnt believe in evolution because he looks (and IQ level) are amazingly similar lol _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|