| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
AmericanIdle Forum Plebian


Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 270 Local time: 1:04 PM
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
wtf? Children don't even know enough to pick a religion. sorry, but Thats just a stupid scenario you created. |
That's why children should be able to depend on their parents to educate them w/ the truth, even if the truth is unsettling. Intellectual, historical and logical laziness is an inadequate excuse.
"Stupid Scenario" just set off the bells and whistles on my patented "Irony Meter" (It's cheaper and runs on less fumes than L. Ron Hubbard's E-meter), but "Stupid Scenario" certainly applies to every religion ever created, whether its followers foolishly believe it to be rational or not. _________________ Fundamentalism: "The hallmark of the collective non-indivduated life" - C.G. Jung
"All our problems arise from man's ceaseless attempts to impose his fictions on the natural world" - Otto Rank |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
SvZurich Loki's Little Valkyrie

Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 23454 Local time: 7:04 PM Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
More reasons to love Dr. Dawkins! Awesome and honest men like him are to be cherished! _________________ Kimberly (HSBUH) aka
Baroness Sylvia von Zurich (the only Goldwater Conservative) endorses the Meadow Party's Bill and Opus for the 2012 Presidential election!
The Atheist Forums have new rules! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nimitz Guest
Local time: 1:04 PM
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Dawkins never said anything about cults | All religions are cults. Some just have more members than others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pr126 resident misanthrope

Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Posts: 8880 Local time: 3:04 AM Location: Londonistan

|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Link _________________ “The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see.” - Ayn Rand |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moloth Fateless

Joined: 27 Aug 2003 Posts: 23105 Local time: 10:04 PM Location: Warner Robins, GA

|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| actualrationalist wrote: | | wtf? Children don't even know enough to pick a religion. sorry, but Thats just a stupid scenario you created. |
that's exactly the point, AR.
Parents are presenting their religion as being the one, true, right to be to these children. The children don't know enough to question.. they're CHILDREN!
the effect is called indoctrination.
So, therefore, why push religion on children at all? why tell them myths a parables as being true and altering their minds for, possibly, the rest of their lives? Why not teach them the tools of science (the tools to discover the way the natural world works) and let THEM decide, as adults, what to believe?
if the parents religion really IS the one, true, way to be, surely the kids will grow up to see that for themselves using logic, reason and facts...  _________________ -=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-
www.Moloth.com
Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eyedunno The Great JuJu at the Bottom of the Sea

Joined: 13 Aug 2005 Posts: 3815 Local time: 1:04 PM Location: Cin City, OH!

|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| actualrationalist wrote: | I also strongly disagree with
Dawkins:"It was hard to be an atheist before The Origin of Species. "
There have been atheists since "The fool hath says in his heart God doesn't Exist"
Voltaire was long before origin of Species and many doubted before him.
those people chose it. |
Yeah, but "atheist" in those days was a blanket term for anybody who rejected Christianity. Voltaire was a deist (as, perhaps, was Hume, though that's not 100% clear).
Incidentally, Candide was probably the funniest book I ever read for a college class (and An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding was probably the one that resonated the strongest with me, though I actually read that once before I started college as well, and that's what made me decide to be a philosophy major for two years, before I changed my mind and my major ). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pr126 resident misanthrope

Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Posts: 8880 Local time: 3:04 AM Location: Londonistan

|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
video to watch _________________ “The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see.” - Ayn Rand |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kmisho Stochastic

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 4814 Local time: 1:04 PM Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Eyedunno wrote: | | actualrationalist wrote: | I also strongly disagree with
Dawkins:"It was hard to be an atheist before The Origin of Species. "
There have been atheists since "The fool hath says in his heart God doesn't Exist"
Voltaire was long before origin of Species and many doubted before him.
those people chose it. |
Yeah, but "atheist" in those days was a blanket term for anybody who rejected Christianity. Voltaire was a deist (as, perhaps, was Hume, though that's not 100% clear).
Incidentally, Candide was probably the funniest book I ever read for a college class (and An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding was probably the one that resonated the strongest with me, though I actually read that once before I started college as well, and that's what made me decide to be a philosophy major for two years, before I changed my mind and my major ). |
Also, though out-and-out atheists existed (I suspect that atheism is almost exactly the same age as religion), they were very rare. So I agree that it was hard to be an atheist more than 150 years ago. It's fairly hard even today. Religion still dominates by far. But I think this is only due to human habit. At this point I take the hardass stance and call it generational abuse.
Not long ago I ran acorss an 11th century Arab atheist and was intrigued enough to change my sig. _________________ K Michau
Now this religion happens to prevail/Until by that one it is overthrown/Because men dare not live with men alone/But always with another fairy tale.
al-Ma'arri, Syrian Poet, died 1057
You deny the existence of 999 alleged Gods. I merely deny one more - yours.
John MacKinnon Robertson, "Godism" 1896
"Never is a long time." Robert Fripp, 1998
Poetry, Art, Music |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kmisho Stochastic

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 4814 Local time: 1:04 PM Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| actualrationalist wrote: |
That is a common misconception upon religion, very few denominations teach such views. I grew up with my mother teaching me the episcopal faith, We were taught it was mans interpretation, not the word of god. I even lived in the bible belt for 3 years (in which I went to a non-denom youth and bible study) most my friends accepted evolution and weren't sent to their rooms. now since he can't discern religion from belief in God, what would be wrong with teaching a child unitarian beliefs or deistic since those don't entail any creeds, Still child abuse? |
It is not a matter of what religions teach. This is precisely where you get off track. The problem is that the (western style) religions are based on nothing, literally.
They have no basis. THIS is the problem. Because if you can believe this or that or ANYTHING with no basis then you can believe anything...literally. If there is no foundation for belief, then there is literally no difference between beliving in universal love and togetherness and believing in killing all infidels. Without basis, there is no distance between these beliefs. In this sense the actual contents of any religion are both irrelevant and arbitrary, irrelevant BECAUSE arbitrary with respect to any sensible theory of knowledge.
This is the main problem with belief without basis, but not the only one. The other is transparent gullibility. This is what makes scepticism so important. Scepticism is a form of self-defense that the gullible lack.
To reiterate, because this is an important point, the problem is not religion, it is believing without basis. It just so happens that religion is the primary stockholder in believing without basis. _________________ K Michau
Now this religion happens to prevail/Until by that one it is overthrown/Because men dare not live with men alone/But always with another fairy tale.
al-Ma'arri, Syrian Poet, died 1057
You deny the existence of 999 alleged Gods. I merely deny one more - yours.
John MacKinnon Robertson, "Godism" 1896
"Never is a long time." Robert Fripp, 1998
Poetry, Art, Music |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
actualrationalist Forum Leader


Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 991 Local time: 1:04 PM
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wrong.
"More reasons to love Dr. Dawkins! Very Happy Awesome and honest men like him are to be cherished!"
why? because he uses cacophemisms to exaggerate his cause?
" All religions are cults. Some just have more members than others."
well in your case cult is just a dysphemism for religion to make your case look better.
"that's exactly the point, AR."
that wasn't his point, he was saying that a parent should take the child to a worship house and decide what religion he wants, when in fact all he/she has as a guide for such is their parents. A child has too short of attention span and literary skills to sit down and read the Koran or Talmud. not too mention if the religion required a house of worship, it would have to correspond with the parents schedule.
"Parents are presenting their religion as being the one, true, right to be to these children. The children don't know enough to question.. they're CHILDREN! "
mine never taught that. If one cares enough he can change around 13 when his brain is fully functional and cares about that sort of stuff, or people won't care at all what their religion is when they get older.
"if the parents religion really IS the one, true, way to be, surely the kids will grow up to see that for themselves using logic, reason and facts... Wink"
depends how the grownup interprets facts and or cares enough. The is no one true way to look at something, that is what communism is for.
"So I agree that it was hard to be an atheist more than 150 years ago."
well buddhism has existed along time as atheistic.
and I was reading a Religious biography on Thomas Jefferson and the author said Voltaire was atheist, though he could be wrong.
"This is the main problem with belief without basis, but not the only one. The other is transparent gullibility. This is what makes scepticism so important. Scepticism is a form of self-defense that the gullible lack. "
Alot of people base their belief on scripture which is based off someone elses interpretation on an event. _________________ "A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion."
-Francis Bacon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kmisho Stochastic

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 4814 Local time: 1:04 PM Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | "More reasons to love Dr. Dawkins! Very Happy Awesome and honest men like him are to be cherished!"
why? because he uses cacophemisms to exaggerate his cause? |
The only thing you're mad about is that he doesn't pretend to be nice. If he pretended to be nice, you'd praise him for it and he'd hate himself for being a liar in his own eyes.
| Quote: | "All religions are cults. Some just have more members than others."
well in your case cult is just a dysphemism for religion to make your case look better. |
The only difference between religion and superstition is the spelling. Get over it.
| Quote: | "that's exactly the point, AR."
that wasn't his point, he was saying that a parent should take the child to a worship house and decide what religion he wants, when in fact all he/she has as a guide for such is their parents. A child has too short of attention span and literary skills to sit down and read the Koran or Talmud. not too mention if the religion required a house of worship, it would have to correspond with the parents schedule. |
That's exactly the point AR. Kids trust their parents too much, from an adult level-headed perspective. A child SHOULD look at his parents with growing doubt if they truck him off to church to learn about magic spells every week (or day), but few child ren yet have the CAPABILITY to wield that sort of healthy doubt.
| Quote: | "Parents are presenting their religion as being the one, true, right to be to these children. The children don't know enough to question.. they're CHILDREN! "
mine never taught that. If one cares enough he can change around 13 when his brain is fully functional and cares about that sort of stuff, or people won't care at all what their religion is when they get older. |
Don't be a moron and deny that there are many parents who do exactly as Dawkins said they do.
| Quote: | "if the parents religion really IS the one, true, way to be, surely the kids will grow up to see that for themselves using logic, reason and facts... Wink"
depends how the grownup interprets facts and or cares enough. The is no one true way to look at something, that is what communism is for. |
How many ways can I look at this?: 2+2=4.
| Quote: | "So I agree that it was hard to be an atheist more than 150 years ago."
well buddhism has existed along time as atheistic.
and I was reading a Religious biography on Thomas Jefferson and the author said Voltaire was atheist, though he could be wrong. |
He did not say it was IMPOSSIBLE. He said it was HARD.
| Quote: | "This is the main problem with belief without basis, but not the only one. The other is transparent gullibility. This is what makes scepticism so important. Scepticism is a form of self-defense that the gullible lack. "
Alot of people base their belief on scripture which is based off someone elses interpretation on an event. |
Which event probably never happened...IF you are educated enough in the field to understand that...ergo no basis in your example. _________________ K Michau
Now this religion happens to prevail/Until by that one it is overthrown/Because men dare not live with men alone/But always with another fairy tale.
al-Ma'arri, Syrian Poet, died 1057
You deny the existence of 999 alleged Gods. I merely deny one more - yours.
John MacKinnon Robertson, "Godism" 1896
"Never is a long time." Robert Fripp, 1998
Poetry, Art, Music |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
actualrationalist Forum Leader


Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 991 Local time: 1:04 PM
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"The only thing you're mad about is that he doesn't pretend to be nice. If he pretended to be nice, you'd praise him for it and he'd hate himself for being a liar in his own eyes. "
well sure I do, I love science, he is an embarrassment to science with his outspoken views (which aren't agreed on by all scientists), and I think it gives scientists a bad image, so I strongly contest Dawkings format. He needs to look at Michael Shermer for some inspiration.
"The only difference between religion and superstition is the spelling. Get over it. "
Apparently you think their is one only one type of religion. I suggest you start looking up religions. BTW this comment was unwarranted because it had nothing to do with what was stated, it was rather an attack or Red Herring.
"A child SHOULD look at his parents with growing doubt if they truck him off to church to learn about magic spells every week (or day), but few child ren yet have the CAPABILITY to wield that sort of healthy doubt. "
I don't know what church you have been too, but at my prior ones, we never practiced magical spells.
"Don't be a moron and deny that there are many parents who do exactly as Dawkins said they do. "
sure theres one, but you neither I possess such statistic that portrays either way, so it is irrational to look one way or the other based off ones empirical observation or the typical stereotype.
"How many ways can I look at this?: 2+2=4. "
mathematics is the one and only field of learning where it captures 100% truth, conjectures are the only things not proved.
"He did not say it was IMPOSSIBLE. He said it was HARD. "
I nor you can't say either way, there is no statistic to base this off of as of this conversation.
"Which event probably never happened...IF you are educated enough in the field to understand that...ergo no basis in your example."
I admit it (along with scholars and historians) that their is a grain of truth in most stories of the bible, some bigger than others. _________________ "A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion."
-Francis Bacon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cheapsuprise Liberated

Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 7288 Local time: 7:04 PM Location: Next door.
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You seam to be confusing some issues here:
| actualrationalist wrote: |
well sure I do, I love science, he is an embarrassment to science with his outspoken views |
So science is about keeping silent, and not troubling others with your difference of opinion?
| Quote: | | (which aren't agreed on by all scientists), |
Ooops.
Kent Hovind is NOT a scientist FYI.
| Quote: | | and I think it gives scientists a bad image, |
Science is not about IMAGE.
| Quote: | | so I strongly contest Dawkings format. He needs to look at Michael Shermer for some inspiration. |
Michael Shermer would hurt your feelings to. Didn't you see that episode of Bullshit?
...Are you finished whining yet? You should try to thicken your skin a little if you plan to stick around here. Things will be changing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nimitz Guest
Local time: 1:04 PM
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cult is an accurate term. As would calling a follower of any religion a cultists. You just personally find the term harsh.
All religions cast spells. You might call them prayers but they are precisely the same thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MasterZap Forum Plebian


Joined: 17 Sep 2005 Posts: 227 Local time: 1:04 PM Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| actualrationalist wrote: |
that wasn't his point, he was saying that a parent should take the child to a worship house and decide what religion he wants, when in fact all he/she has as a guide for such is their parents. A child has too short of attention span and literary skills to sit down and read the Koran or Talmud. |
This is precicely why the child shouldn't be exposed to such things until it's old enough to make up it's own mind.
It's precicely for that reason that it is child abuse to force them into it at an early age.
/Z _________________ Shr?dingers cat is dead alright, Stephen Hawking shot him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|