| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mr_C
Reckoner
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 6756
Local time: 8:32 PM
Location: Pale Blue Dot
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: |
  |
|
| UnderGrace wrote: | | Quote: |
so... its says "days"... and you're questioning whether or not it meant "days"? O_o |
The english is the word "days." But the word that is used in the Hebrew text is more ambiguous. It could mean the literal day, or age of time.
| Quote: | 2) The word yôma has multiple meanings in Hebrew. BDB's Hebrew lexicon gives the following definitions:
1) day, time, year
a) day (as opposed to night)
b) day (24 hour period)
1) as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 11
2) as a division of time
a) a working day, a day's journey
c) days, lifetime (pl.)
d) time, period (general)
e) year
f) temporal references
1) today
2) yesterday
3) tomorrow
|
|
Let's not all forget that these "days" of creation occurred before the sun was created...
There is no coherent definition of "day" without the presence of the sun, from our perspective. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
UnderGrace
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 98
Local time: 8:32 AM
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | "God" could have easily been created by another, equally supreme, but absent god. Maybe Yahweh was born from "God most high" (Genesis 14), but then disappeared. This is what happens when you talk about things you can't prove, you create more questions then you have answered. |
Throughout scriptures God has many different names...the Hebrews used the term YahWeh because they respected the name of God so much that they didn't even want to say it. So they used other discriptive words as well, but all are the same God...there is no contradiction on this matter within scripture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SalsaShark
has filled in a custom rank.
Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 1158
Local time: 9:32 PM
Location: Regina SK CAN
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really wish UnderGrace would stop saying the word logic. It's pretty clear that he doesn't even understand the Principle of Non-Contradiction, which was like - the first fucking rule of logic ever discovered... or developed, or whatever.
_________________
"Oh bury me, far away please, bury me." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UnderGrace
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 98
Local time: 8:32 AM
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SalsaShark wrote: | | I really wish UnderGrace would stop saying the word logic. It's pretty clear that he doesn't even understand the Principle of Non-Contradiction, which was like - the first fucking rule of logic ever discovered... or developed, or whatever. |
Well then you should understand more than anyone under my discussion of absolutes...you can read it on the other topic but basically, saying that there are no absolutes=an absolute statement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nimitz
Guest
Local time: 12:32 PM
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Garden of Eden is a lie.
I'm not assuming anything. The buy-bull says gawd created Adam and Eve.
The buy-bull says only two people were on the face of the Earth. NOT an entire race of primitive homo sapeins who later evolved into Homo Sapeins Sapiens!
Gawd spoke to them. You say gawds word is a lie. The buy-bull lies about the whole story.
If you use evolution in your buy-bull then there is no original man and woman. NONE. You can't get around this.
If you use evolution in your buy-bull then there is no knowledge of good and evil.
If you use evolution in your buy-bull then there is no original sin. NONE. Jebus die for nothing!
And don't tell me about lack of physical evidence. That covers your ass like a blanket.
| Quote: | | Saying Genesis is a lie is only assuming the atheistic position... |
You make that assumption when you say the buy-bull is wrong.
I'm taking the buy-bull at it's word. It's either the unerrant word of gawd or it isn't.
There's no language problem here. Either gawd created man as it says in the buy-bull or he didn't.
God created a garden, put a tree of knowledge in the garden, then put animals and TWO people in it, or he didn't.
Genesis is a lie if you believe evolution. There's no middle ground.
You can't have it both ways. Get off the fucking fence.
I love the way theists pervert their own holey gawd inspired book of bullshit.
Last edited by Nimitz on Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moloth
Fateless
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23105
Local time: 9:32 PM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i like the part where God comes wondering around the Garden of Eden, but can;t find them, because they're hiding... lol. he had to verbally call out to them!
_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-
www.Moloth.com
Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nimitz
Guest
Local time: 12:32 PM
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yep and has to ask... where are you, who told you that you was nekid?! OMNI-WHAT?! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SalsaShark
has filled in a custom rank.
Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 1158
Local time: 9:32 PM
Location: Regina SK CAN
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| UnderGrace wrote: | | SalsaShark wrote: | | I really wish UnderGrace would stop saying the word logic. It's pretty clear that he doesn't even understand the Principle of Non-Contradiction, which was like - the first fucking rule of logic ever discovered... or developed, or whatever. |
Well then you should understand more than anyone under my discussion of absolutes...you can read it on the other topic but basically, saying that there are no absolutes=an absolute statement. |
What does you not understanding something have to do with me understanding something better than anyone. I'm fairly certain that the ONLY thing that I even COULD understand better than anyone else here is something mathematical - but even that's a longshot. However, that's way beside the point - the point is that there was once again, zero logic in that statement.
you not understanding =/= me understanding something relatively unrelated better than anyone else
Please don't quote me again, it's embarrassing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
greyghost
Annoyingly Addicting
Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 1254
Local time: 10:32 PM
Location: Earth, Milky way, Universe
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| UnderGrace wrote: | | Quote: | | "God" could have easily been created by another, equally supreme, but absent god. Maybe Yahweh was born from "God most high" (Genesis 14), but then disappeared. This is what happens when you talk about things you can't prove, you create more questions then you have answered. |
Throughout scriptures God has many different names...the Hebrews used the term YahWeh because they respected the name of God so much that they didn't even want to say it. So they used other discriptive words as well, but all are the same God...there is no contradiction on this matter within scripture. |
That was not my point at all, please reread it carefully. My rant about "God most high" was only hypothetical.
_________________
"There is no such uncertainty, as a sure thing."-Robert Burns
"A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be."-Albert Einstein
"Patriotism is the willingness to kill and be killed for trivial reasons."-Bertrand Russell
"I want someone to quote me in their signature. That's why I'm a pandering whore."-CET
New blog entry- 11/03/08 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Live Video and Chat Room
Freethought Videos
FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Register
