| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Philosophos When we look at you, we see an asshole

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 9299 Local time: 7:16 PM Location: In ur body cast
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Noncognitivism is a perfectly defensible view of theism. And I definitely would not assert that noncognitivists "believe" that there's no God, as it's part of their assertion that the God concept is literally nonsense.
I don't think that it's the best way to go, however - and in fact I think the viewpoint has some flaws. But, if you all subscribe to this viewpoint, then you're right in saying that you "have no belief," as one cannot have a propositional attitude toward something that is not a proposition in the first place. _________________ Ass!
Hole!
Ass!
Hole! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Zocrates I rank, therefore I am

Joined: 07 Feb 2006 Posts: 2275 Local time: 7:16 PM Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Philosophos wrote: | | All words are labels, but I'm sorry if you feel insulted by my statements. However, if you literally think that when people talk about God, it's jibberish, then you are a noncognativist by definition. |
Oh I'm not insulted in the least. But since no one (not even those that believe in god) know what they're talking about when describing what god is.....everyone is a noncognativist. What purpose does this label serve if you can basically substitue it with "human being". Same with the word "god"...you can substitue is with "nothing" and it doesn't lose its meaning. That label means nothing to me unless clearly defined. _________________ Just Talk About It
"Faith is often the boast of the man who is too lazy to investigate." - F.M. Knowles
"We only fear things in proportion to our ignorance of them" - Titus Livius
"Ain't nothin to it but to do it!" -Martin Payne |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9908 Local time: 9:16 AM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
The point is that there is a difference. I believe x, and I believe not X are opposite propositions, and one can only consider one of those propositions to be true. |
There IS no X..only P _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9908 Local time: 9:16 AM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Philosophos wrote: | Noncognitivism is a perfectly defensible view of theism. And I definitely would not assert that noncognitivists "believe" that there's no God, as it's part of their assertion that the God concept is literally nonsense.
I don't think that it's the best way to go, however - and in fact I think the viewpoint has some flaws. But, if you all subscribe to this viewpoint, then you're right in saying that you "have no belief," as one cannot have a propositional attitude toward something that is not a proposition in the first place. |
Oh FUCK YEAH, then I'm a noncongenitivesist! _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zocrates I rank, therefore I am

Joined: 07 Feb 2006 Posts: 2275 Local time: 7:16 PM Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| josephpalazzo wrote: | | The point is that there is a difference. I believe x, and I believe not X are opposite propositions, and one can only consider one of those propositions to be true. |
Only if you know what X is. If you don't know what X is, you shouldn't automatically take the stance that you do not belive in X because once you find out what X is (if you ever do), you may change your mind and believe in it. _________________ Just Talk About It
"Faith is often the boast of the man who is too lazy to investigate." - F.M. Knowles
"We only fear things in proportion to our ignorance of them" - Titus Livius
"Ain't nothin to it but to do it!" -Martin Payne |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9908 Local time: 9:16 AM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zocrates wrote: | | Philosophos wrote: | | All words are labels, but I'm sorry if you feel insulted by my statements. However, if you literally think that when people talk about God, it's jibberish, then you are a noncognativist by definition. |
Oh I'm not insulted in the least. But since no one (not even those that believe in god) know what they're talking about when describing what god is.....everyone is a noncognativist. What purpose does this label serve if you can basically substitue it with "human being". Same with the word "god"...you can substitue is with "nothing" and it doesn't lose its meaning. That label means nothing to me unless clearly defined. |
SHHHHH! If it makes Phil believe I don't- not non-believe in gods let it go!!! _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philosophos When we look at you, we see an asshole

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 9299 Local time: 7:16 PM Location: In ur body cast
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| baddogma wrote: | | Quote: |
The point is that there is a difference. I believe x, and I believe not X are opposite propositions, and one can only consider one of those propositions to be true. |
There IS no X..only P |
Chi - rho? Holy shit! If you meant that as a joke: I am not worthy!
And if you didn't... fuck. I get dork-of-the-year. I guess I better go make a new D&D character with anomaly... *snort*. _________________ Ass!
Hole!
Ass!
Hole! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9908 Local time: 9:16 AM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zocrates wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | The point is that there is a difference. I believe x, and I believe not X are opposite propositions, and one can only consider one of those propositions to be true. |
Only if you know what X is. If you don't know what X is, you shouldn't automatically take the stance that you do not belive in X because once you find out what X is (if you ever do), you may change your mind and believe in it. |
Well up to that point you don't so stay a nongongenitivenisist! _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zocrates I rank, therefore I am

Joined: 07 Feb 2006 Posts: 2275 Local time: 7:16 PM Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| baddogma wrote: | | SHHHHH! If it makes Phil believe I don't- not non-believe in gods let it go!!! |
No, I can't SHHHH.....this whole exercise has been a secrect quest to become a forum leader (and I'm almost there).  _________________ Just Talk About It
"Faith is often the boast of the man who is too lazy to investigate." - F.M. Knowles
"We only fear things in proportion to our ignorance of them" - Titus Livius
"Ain't nothin to it but to do it!" -Martin Payne |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philosophos When we look at you, we see an asshole

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 9299 Local time: 7:16 PM Location: In ur body cast
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| baddogma wrote: | | SHHHHH! If it makes Phil believe I don't- not non-believe in gods let it go!!! |
I merely lack belief that you don't not non-believe. _________________ Ass!
Hole!
Ass!
Hole! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 7:16 PM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| baddogma wrote: | | Quote: |
The point is that there is a difference. I believe x, and I believe not X are opposite propositions, and one can only consider one of those propositions to be true. |
There IS no X..only P |
In the language of Apes, x=P and not-X = not-P, by the Substitution Axiom.
(To paraphrase Mark Twain, the unsoundness of the substitution axiom has been greatly exaggerated.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9908 Local time: 9:16 AM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zocrates wrote: | | baddogma wrote: | | SHHHHH! If it makes Phil believe I don't- not non-believe in gods let it go!!! |
No, I can't SHHHH.....this whole exercise has been a secrect quest to become a forum leader (and I'm almost there).  |
Fuck...I'm still only a tetrapod... _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9908 Local time: 9:16 AM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Philosophos wrote: | | baddogma wrote: | | SHHHHH! If it makes Phil believe I don't- not non-believe in gods let it go!!! |
I merely lack belief that you don't not non-believe. |
I'm skeptickital about that! _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/
Evidence>Faith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Philosophos When we look at you, we see an asshole

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 9299 Local time: 7:16 PM Location: In ur body cast
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zocrates wrote: | | Oh I'm not insulted in the least. |
Cool. I just wanna be sure.
| Quote: | | But since no one (not even those that believe in god) know what they're talking about when describing what god is.....everyone is a noncognativist. |
But isn't this self-contradictory? For then you yourself didn't even know what your saying in the above statement when you said "god." _________________ Ass!
Hole!
Ass!
Hole! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 7:16 PM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Philosophos wrote: | | baddogma wrote: | | SHHHHH! If it makes Phil believe I don't- not non-believe in gods let it go!!! |
I merely lack belief that you don't not non-believe. |
Must I correct you (for the umpteenth time *patience, patience*)? YOU BELIEVE THAT "I merely lack belief that you don't not non-believe". *SIGH* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|