| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dawkadoodle
Forum Master
Joined: 03 Feb 2008
Posts: 2230
Local time: 10:21 PM
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:00 pm Post subject: |
  |
|
| Moloth wrote: |
have you considered that you are able to ignore him because he has not targeted your threads/posts for trolling? or, perhaps, because others have taken that bullet (willingly or otherwise)? congrats to you for ignoring a problem. Your consideration for others is commendable. I find your 'out of sight, out of mind' attitude about this topic... distasteful |
I don't target any thread or posts for "trolling," whatsoever. I respond with my honest opinion or corrections, with no intent to troll- Much like everyone else here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
Moloth
Coin Operated Boy
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23071
Local time: 10:21 PM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dawkadoodle wrote: | | Moloth wrote: |
have you considered that you are able to ignore him because he has not targeted your threads/posts for trolling? or, perhaps, because others have taken that bullet (willingly or otherwise)? congrats to you for ignoring a problem. Your consideration for others is commendable. I find your 'out of sight, out of mind' attitude about this topic... distasteful |
I don't target any thread or posts for "trolling," whatsoever. I respond with my honest opinion or corrections, with no intent to troll- Much like everyone else here. |
stop stalking me, psycho.
_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-
www.Moloth.com
Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dawkadoodle
Forum Master
Joined: 03 Feb 2008
Posts: 2230
Local time: 10:21 PM
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Moloth wrote: | | Dawkadoodle wrote: | | Moloth wrote: |
have you considered that you are able to ignore him because he has not targeted your threads/posts for trolling? or, perhaps, because others have taken that bullet (willingly or otherwise)? congrats to you for ignoring a problem. Your consideration for others is commendable. I find your 'out of sight, out of mind' attitude about this topic... distasteful |
I don't target any thread or posts for "trolling," whatsoever. I respond with my honest opinion or corrections, with no intent to troll- Much like everyone else here. |
stop stalking me, psycho. |
This is the "Love Shack" Forum, trying to provoke and flame me is against the rules- Yet that hasn't stopped you from provoking me now and making unsupported accusations has it?
Stop breaking the rules and if you are able, prove your claims. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moloth
Coin Operated Boy
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23071
Local time: 10:21 PM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dawkadoodle wrote: | | Moloth wrote: | | rickyroma wrote: | | Moloth wrote: | | 1. fine, but that will only give him the attention you seek.. and will cause people to accuse you of 'feeding the troll' |
Probably. As I said that would be for the personal satisfaction of pwning someone.
| Quote: | | 2. this will be a fruitless endeavor, as many people can testify to. |
Many have been banned or suspended from AF, and many more will. If I had evidence that a poster was making my life miserable without provocation, it would indeed be a fruitful endeavour.
Ignoring people is rarely a fruitless endeavour, as many people can testify to. |
i'm sorry.. but the facts of the situation do not agree with you here. there have been multiple threads, countless PMs and many links and re-links to evidence... all to no avail. the (old) Mods sat on their hands... and when one DID do something, it was in the least 'legal' way possible (a vigilante action), and therefore, the action was revoked.
i respect you a lot, ricky... i just disagree with you on this topic. |
There are no "facts" present. If there were "facts" you would have presented them long ago when I first asked for those "Evidences" of me being a "troll" as you continually claim. Secondly "least legal," it was completely illicit. |
stop stalking me, psycho.
_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-
www.Moloth.com
Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dawkadoodle
Forum Master
Joined: 03 Feb 2008
Posts: 2230
Local time: 10:21 PM
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So instead of verifying the content you claim to be factual you instead flame me again despite the rules forbidding it in the "love Shack" forum. That isn't "healthy debate."
I ask you a question, you flame me- Don't you think you've just invalidated your own arguments against me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FlatEarth1024
Hey, Everybody!
Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 4152
Local time: 3:21 AM
Location: Dippin' my balls in it.
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dawkadoodle wrote: | So instead of verifying the content you claim to be factual you instead flame me again despite the rules forbidding it in the "love Shack" forum. That isn't "healthy debate."
I ask you a question, you flame me- Don't you think you've just invalidated your own arguments against me? |
The man is under no obligation to answer your questions. Clearly, while "stop stalking me, psycho" is not the most inviting of replies, it says that he no longer wishes discourse with you.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dawkadoodle
Forum Master
Joined: 03 Feb 2008
Posts: 2230
Local time: 10:21 PM
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| FlatEarth1024 wrote: | | Dawkadoodle wrote: | So instead of verifying the content you claim to be factual you instead flame me again despite the rules forbidding it in the "love Shack" forum. That isn't "healthy debate."
I ask you a question, you flame me- Don't you think you've just invalidated your own arguments against me? |
The man is under no obligation to answer your questions. Clearly, while "stop stalking me, psycho" is not the most inviting of replies, it says that he no longer wishes discourse with you. |
And I'm under no obligation to let this man defame me either, so it appears we have reached a standstill- If he retains the right to avoid validating his claims then I retain to right to continually point out his failure to do so when he once again claims something is the truth. Secondly, if this person does not wish discourse with me then he is not showing it by continually making unsupported claims of me and even provoking me- And that much is observable. Lastly, by refusing to prove this it goes to show that moloth is trying to flame and provoke me.
He doesn't want to talk to me, I don't want him to talk lies about me- So what do you propose- Nothing, you can't propose a solution. You can't rant about someone and realistically expect that they won't be there to defend themselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moloth
Coin Operated Boy
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23071
Local time: 10:21 PM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dawkadoodle wrote: | | FlatEarth1024 wrote: | | Dawkadoodle wrote: | So instead of verifying the content you claim to be factual you instead flame me again despite the rules forbidding it in the "love Shack" forum. That isn't "healthy debate."
I ask you a question, you flame me- Don't you think you've just invalidated your own arguments against me? |
The man is under no obligation to answer your questions. Clearly, while "stop stalking me, psycho" is not the most inviting of replies, it says that he no longer wishes discourse with you. |
And I'm under no obligation to let this man defame me either, so it appears we have reached a standstill- If he retains the right to avoid validating his claims then I retain to right to continually point out his failure to do so when he once again claims something is the truth. Secondly, if this person does not wish discourse with me then he is not showing it by continually making unsupported claims of me and even provoking me- And that much is observable. Lastly, by refusing to prove this it goes to show that moloth is trying to flame and provoke me.
He doesn't want to talk to me, I don't want him to talk lies about me- So what do you propose- Nothing, you can't propose a solution. You can't rant about someone and realistically expect that they won't be there to defend themselves. |
Stop obsessing over me, Dawk. its unhealthy.
_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-
www.Moloth.com
Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dawkadoodle
Forum Master
Joined: 03 Feb 2008
Posts: 2230
Local time: 10:21 PM
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Moloth wrote: | | Dawkadoodle wrote: | | FlatEarth1024 wrote: | | Dawkadoodle wrote: | So instead of verifying the content you claim to be factual you instead flame me again despite the rules forbidding it in the "love Shack" forum. That isn't "healthy debate."
I ask you a question, you flame me- Don't you think you've just invalidated your own arguments against me? |
The man is under no obligation to answer your questions. Clearly, while "stop stalking me, psycho" is not the most inviting of replies, it says that he no longer wishes discourse with you. |
And I'm under no obligation to let this man defame me either, so it appears we have reached a standstill- If he retains the right to avoid validating his claims then I retain to right to continually point out his failure to do so when he once again claims something is the truth. Secondly, if this person does not wish discourse with me then he is not showing it by continually making unsupported claims of me and even provoking me- And that much is observable. Lastly, by refusing to prove this it goes to show that moloth is trying to flame and provoke me.
He doesn't want to talk to me, I don't want him to talk lies about me- So what do you propose- Nothing, you can't propose a solution. You can't rant about someone and realistically expect that they won't be there to defend themselves. |
Stop obsessing over me, Dawk. its unhealthy. |
How contradictory is your response since you've said more about me in this thread then I have ever said about you. In fact, you were one of the posters who made this thread about me in the first place. Your responses are numerous concerning me. Its evident that you won't even let the rules obstruct your path from spreading libel of me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FlatEarth1024
Hey, Everybody!
Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 4152
Local time: 3:21 AM
Location: Dippin' my balls in it.
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dawkadoodle wrote: | | So what do you propose- Nothing, you can't propose a solution. You can't rant about someone and realistically expect that they won't be there to defend themselves. |
That is EXACTLY what I propose, and what I have proposed these many months...Nothing. Moloth is taking to heart the advice that I and others have offered and is choosing not to reply to you. It is his right to do so.
He does not have to reply to you. You do not have to reply to him. There is no need for the never-ending game of one-upsmanship. You may say anything you like. Moloth may say anything he likes. The balance...the beauty if you will...is that if one of you chooses to not engage the other directly, then a flame war can not develop, in spite of the best efforts of either party.
So "Nothing" is exactly what I propose, and I commend Moloth for his efforts in doing exactly that. Perhaps if you could suppress your own need to reply, rebut and refute every single comment, you too would notice a change in both overall atmosphere and the way you are personally perceived.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moloth
Coin Operated Boy
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23071
Local time: 10:21 PM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dawkadoodle wrote: | | Moloth wrote: | | Dawkadoodle wrote: | | FlatEarth1024 wrote: | | Dawkadoodle wrote: | So instead of verifying the content you claim to be factual you instead flame me again despite the rules forbidding it in the "love Shack" forum. That isn't "healthy debate."
I ask you a question, you flame me- Don't you think you've just invalidated your own arguments against me? |
The man is under no obligation to answer your questions. Clearly, while "stop stalking me, psycho" is not the most inviting of replies, it says that he no longer wishes discourse with you. |
And I'm under no obligation to let this man defame me either, so it appears we have reached a standstill- If he retains the right to avoid validating his claims then I retain to right to continually point out his failure to do so when he once again claims something is the truth. Secondly, if this person does not wish discourse with me then he is not showing it by continually making unsupported claims of me and even provoking me- And that much is observable. Lastly, by refusing to prove this it goes to show that moloth is trying to flame and provoke me.
He doesn't want to talk to me, I don't want him to talk lies about me- So what do you propose- Nothing, you can't propose a solution. You can't rant about someone and realistically expect that they won't be there to defend themselves. |
Stop obsessing over me, Dawk. its unhealthy. |
How contradictory is your response since you've said more about me in this thread then I have ever said about you. In fact, you were one of the posters who made this thread about me in the first place. Your responses are numerous concerning me. Its evident that you won't even let the rules obstruct your path from spreading libel of me. |
this the THIRD time, in as many posts, that i am telling you to stop following and harassing, trolling and obsessing over me.
please note that a Mod is reading these requests.
_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-
www.Moloth.com
Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Philosophos
Do it
Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9289
Local time: 11:21 PM
Location: Where Scum Are
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dawk:
I'm thankful for you for at least two things:
1) Thank you for starting a thread on our thread on explostions. OMFG... in the words of David Letterman: "more 'splosions!!!!"
And...
2) Essentially calling me a dipshit when I was being a dipshit. I won't provide the link, but it was wour assessment of the "Gettin' in TUne sux" thread. Thanks for waking me up, Dawk.
Dawk - ya did me good in those two instances. I just wanted to say that (and yes, in shitty English...)
ETA: Why the hell is my response in this thread? I fucking specifically looked for certain threads to ressurect, and it wasn't fucking this one... god, I hate the mo...Gods...
OMG. I worship mistress Kimmie. I prostrate before her. May she grant us mercy...
HHHmmmmmmmm Hmmmmmmmmm.....
I prosatrate before mistresss ShaSha. May she grant us mercy.
HHHmmmmmmmm Hmmmmmmmmm.....
I prostrate berfore mister Hillbilly Atheist... so I can...
...
Can....
Yum. Honey... what's the problem, dawg?!??!?!!!??? 'Tever it is, I can solve it! Easy! Come here, baby....
_________________
The whores and politicians will shout 'save us'...
...and I'll whisper 'no'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jambrose
billions and billions
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 578
Local time: 11:21 PM
Location: Detroit, Michigan
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what
_________________
"In our obscurity -- in all this vastness -- there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FlatEarth1024
Hey, Everybody!
Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 4152
Local time: 3:21 AM
Location: Dippin' my balls in it.
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't mind Phil. His doctor recently switched his medication and he's still getting a handle on the side effects.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Moloth
Coin Operated Boy
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Posts: 23071
Local time: 10:21 PM
Location: Warner Robins, GA
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
whatever Xena HAD, Philo must've GOTTEN. O_o
_________________
-=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-
www.Moloth.com
Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Live Video and Chat Room
Freethought Videos
FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Register
