The Infidel Guy Show
The Debate Hour Show

Faith and Freethought
3 Podcasts, One Feed

or visit this page.


FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MemberlistMemberlist    UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister   
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 VideoRoom and ChatLive Video and Chat Room   The Infidel Guy's Video RoomFreethought Videos
BlogsBlogs    My BlogWeblogs News


Embed Our Player

~ TIP JAR ~


Goooodbyyyyyye to Evolutiooooon
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> Biology & Medicine
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Unbeliever
Forum Master
Forum Master


Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 2557
Local time: 10:11 PM
Location: The exact center of my observable universe

PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:57 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

EA215 wrote:
Atheists think just because science hasn't acknowledge God means that there's no God.


No, the fact that science hasn't acknowledged God is merely because science has no need of that hypothesis. Atheists (or at least this atheist) disbelieve in God because of Ockam's razor and the fact that the attributes of the theistic God are mutually exclusive and self contradictory.
_________________
"True wisdom is less presuming than folly. The wise man doubteth often, and changeth his mind; the fool is obstinate, and doubteth not; he knoweth all things but his own ignorance."
Akhenaton?( c. B.P. 1575)

Science is a lighthouse,
Faith is the rocks below.

God Not Found - resources for atheist/agnostics
"the universe is under no obligation to be easy for us to comprehend."
moloth
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Quasarsphere
Visitor
Visitor


Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Posts: 5
Local time: 6:11 PM
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
nz.gif

PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:07 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

God, I knew this would be a video from that useless little cunt VenomFangX before I even clicked on it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Andreusz
Royal Citizen
Royal Citizen


Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 340
Local time: 12:11 AM
Location: Johannesburg
sf.gif

PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:17 am    Post subject: Re: Goooodbyyyyyye to Evolutiooooon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

josephpalazzo wrote:


Evolution would turn out to be wrong if bones of dinosaurs were to be found in the Precambrian eon. So yeah, evolution can be falsified.


Yes, that's evolution as such, and I've often read this ... but what about Darwin's theory that the mechanism of evolution is natural selection? I've thought about this often, and I can't see any way it can be falsified. (No, I haven't gone religious as a consequence!) Would be interested to hear if anyone has any ideas on this.
The problem as I see it is: if an organism/species survives and flourishes, then clearly it is 'fit'; if not, it isn't. I really can't see how this can be falsified.
Or is Darwin's theory simply an application of Ockham's razor -- the simplest possible explanation that covers all the facts?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eyedunno
The Great JuJu at the Bottom of the Sea


Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 3811
Local time: 3:11 PM
Location: Cin City, OH!
us.gif

PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:25 am    Post subject: Re: Goooodbyyyyyye to Evolutiooooon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

josephpalazzo wrote:
EA215 wrote:

Link


Evolution would turn out to be wrong if bones of dinosaurs were to be found in the Precambrian eon. So yeah, evolution can be falsified.

Heck, ANY bones in the Precambrian or in the Cambrian.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stickhorse
Antichrist


Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 870
Local time: 1:11 AM
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:28 am    Post subject: Re: Goooodbyyyyyye to Evolutiooooon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Andreusz wrote:
josephpalazzo wrote:


Evolution would turn out to be wrong if bones of dinosaurs were to be found in the Precambrian eon. So yeah, evolution can be falsified.


Yes, that's evolution as such, and I've often read this ... but what about Darwin's theory that the mechanism of evolution is natural selection? I've thought about this often, and I can't see any way it can be falsified. (No, I haven't gone religious as a consequence!) Would be interested to hear if anyone has any ideas on this.
The problem as I see it is: if an organism/species survives and flourishes, then clearly it is 'fit'; if not, it isn't. I really can't see how this can be falsified.
Or is Darwin's theory simply an application of Ockham's razor -- the simplest possible explanation that covers all the facts?


your problem is that you're oversimplifying natural selection to mean simply, "survival of the fittest".

wikki wrote:
Natural selection is the process by which favorable heritable traits become more common in successive generations of a population of reproducing organisms, and unfavorable heritable traits become less common, due to differential reproduction of genotypes.


this could be easily falsified don't you agree?
_________________

http://myspace.com/stickhorse
you'll never believe what i got baddogma to do for a klondike bar!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
josephpalazzo
Illusion Master


Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 8036
Local time: 12:11 AM
Location: D-brane

PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:40 am    Post subject: Re: Goooodbyyyyyye to Evolutiooooon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Andreusz wrote:
josephpalazzo wrote:


Evolution would turn out to be wrong if bones of dinosaurs were to be found in the Precambrian eon. So yeah, evolution can be falsified.


Yes, that's evolution as such, and I've often read this ... but what about Darwin's theory that the mechanism of evolution is natural selection? I've thought about this often, and I can't see any way it can be falsified. (No, I haven't gone religious as a consequence!) Would be interested to hear if anyone has any ideas on this.
The problem as I see it is: if an organism/species survives and flourishes, then clearly it is 'fit'; if not, it isn't. I really can't see how this can be falsified.
Or is Darwin's theory simply an application of Ockham's razor -- the simplest possible explanation that covers all the facts?


Good point. However, you must keep in mind that natural selection is just one leg of the theory of evolution, along with mutations, gene drift and speciation. So I don't know that every part of a theory must hold to Popper's test of falsification. Wouldn't we be taking that test to extreme?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog
Rortykiller
Forum Leader
Forum Leader


Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Posts: 722
Local time: 12:11 AM

PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:08 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Evolution is comprised strictly of two selective pressures (not one). Natural selection (survival of the fittest) and Sexual selection (often female mate selection). These pressures operate on the biological imperative of genetic drift (evident in all life forms). Thats the entire thing.
I wouldn't go as far as to call it Occam's razor though, the theory really requires knowledge of biology.
It does however cover all the facts, and though in a hypothetical way something could disprove evolution Occam's razor makes us realize how unlikely this hypothetical can be.
_________________
"rights" are the modern recontextualizing of "holy"; a romanticized state of being beyond reproach.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Disko Pickle
Intern
Intern


Joined: 11 Nov 2008
Posts: 53
Local time: 11:11 PM

pp.gif

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:22 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Quasarsphere wrote:
God, I knew this would be a video from that useless little cunt VenomFangX before I even clicked on it.



You're just being narrow minded.

I, for one, have been completely convinced by that video and I now acknowledge the existence of the one true God and his only begotten son, Jesus Christ. In fact, I just came back from becoming a member of a church: the Church of Satan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jutter
Quixotic Cloggy


Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 6674
Local time: 6:11 AM
Location: Den Helder, the Netherlands
nl.gif

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:34 am    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Sea of red wrote:
Just like all the other theists trolls,this will probably be his one and only post.

To this top-preformer's credit, the postcount was ultimately cranked up to a whopping three ignorant posts.
_________________
~ Let us be reasonable ~
Congratulations: you are paracorrect about the supernatural.
*"If there were nobody listening to gods anymore, there would be nothing left for us to do,...
... then to finally start listening to each other."

*As any gamer will tell you: God-mode is a cheat-code.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kmisho
Stochastic


Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 4683
Local time: 3:11 PM
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:44 am    Post subject: Re: Goooodbyyyyyye to Evolutiooooon Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Andreusz wrote:
josephpalazzo wrote:


Evolution would turn out to be wrong if bones of dinosaurs were to be found in the Precambrian eon. So yeah, evolution can be falsified.


Yes, that's evolution as such, and I've often read this ... but what about Darwin's theory that the mechanism of evolution is natural selection? I've thought about this often, and I can't see any way it can be falsified. (No, I haven't gone religious as a consequence!) Would be interested to hear if anyone has any ideas on this.
The problem as I see it is: if an organism/species survives and flourishes, then clearly it is 'fit'; if not, it isn't. I really can't see how this can be falsified.
Or is Darwin's theory simply an application of Ockham's razor -- the simplest possible explanation that covers all the facts?

This is the old tautology argument. A species is deemed fit because it survives, yet survives because it's fit. The problem is that fitness is not defined by survival nor is survival defined by fitness.

A simple example I got from SJ Gould: A bunch of species of fish live in a lake, some more fit to survive in that lake than others. A drought comes and the lake dries up. You would expect all to die regardless of how well or poorly adapted each is to the lake environment. Now, one species does survive, a poor swimmer, a scanger living off scraps that hides in the shadows that is so unfit it has developed the ability to survive for some short period out of the water just to lay its eggs in safety. Suddenly, with the unpredictable change in environment to severe drought, the least fit becomes the most fit. Fitness to a particular niche is no guarantee or predictor of survival.
_________________
K Michau
Now this religion happens to prevail/Until by that one it is overthrown/Because men dare not live with men alone/But always with another fairy tale.
al-Ma'arri, Syrian Poet, died 1057

You deny the existence of 999 alleged Gods. I merely deny one more - yours.
John MacKinnon Robertson, "Godism" 1896

"Never is a long time." Robert Fripp, 1998

Poetry, Art, Music
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> Biology & Medicine All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Page 5 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Mortgages - Unblock Myspace - Ipod nano - 0 Credit Cards - Remortgages
phpBB SEO