God Hates Furries

Kyuu · Visitor Joined: 05 Dec 2006 Posts: 8 Local time: 11:16 PM

A new website is born to those who call themselves ''Furries''.

http://www.godhatesfurries.com/

The website condemn furries to death according to the bible.

tonyman1989 · Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:05 am Post subject:

want is the site about it won't open for me.

and whats a ''Furries''?
_________________
"If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for a reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed." Albert Einstein

"For then we will know the mind of God." Stephen Hawking

"We admit that we are like apes, but we seldom realise that we are apes." Richard Dawkins

http://www.atheistforums.com/weblog.php?w=22 Tonyman1989 blog's - updated on 8/28/07 - An interview of steven weinberg on religion

Specus_Meretricis · Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:20 am Post subject:

There is no God. And he does indeed hate Furries.
_________________
Fuck you bitch!!! I told you the asparagus is in the freezer! - William Shatner

What do you call someone that doesn't laugh at asparagus jokes? A human being.

physik · Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:59 am Post subject:

Some of the emails on that site are along the lines of FSTDT. Crazy.
_________________
If you understand 2001 on the first viewing, we will have failed. - Arthur C. Clarke

A_Atheist_named_Christian · Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:47 pm Post subject:

I'm not sure what Pikachu's reaction to this site will be.

Strafio · Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 3:20 pm Post subject:

If God hates this furry then he's clearly gay!

On a more serious note, I think Pika will hate that site. It's not a site of Christian biggotry a la 'God hates fags' but more is a more serious attack on 'Furrys'. She'd consider it quite slanderous. Interestingly, reading what they called Furries, they probably wouldn't consider Pika one. They consider her a person who likes to do some of the same things that Furries do. Their idea of a furry is someone who considers the discovery channel to be pornography and who is obsessed with seeing cartoon characters in sex scenes... things like that...
_________________
Let's all google bomb scientology!!!

Kosh · Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:01 pm Post subject:

SvZurich · Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:52 pm Post subject:

Hi Kyuu!
_________________
Kimberly (HSBUH) aka
Baroness Sylvia von Zurich (the only Goldwater Conservative) endorses the Meadow Party's Bill and Opus for the 2012 Presidential election!

The Atheist Forums have new rules!

Pikachu · Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:27 pm Post subject:

That website piss me off.

I have to admit that my subculture is my major weakness because it is indeed irrational for the reason that many of furries are zoophiles, plushophiles & toonophiles. Many are also Gay/Bi which is normal to me. Many of the furry fandom are ''Insane''. In other words, they go to the extreme ''animal''. Im just a moderate, i think yiffing is good but not in public. I do not wear my fursuit in public exept haloween or in a furry convention. I have to say that there's alot of hate against the furries because of the media's misunderstanding.

Furries is more than just a fetish, it's a pack of many things people love:

The arts
The furs
The costumes
The plushies
The animals
The actings

All in one ! If you like one or more of these things, your into the furry fandom. But not all think the same kind of ''love''. Some are just too horny and have sex with it. Personalty i just can't ejaculate without my furry tail.

There is evidence for this at wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_Valley

So you cannot say that:

P1: All Furries are X
C1: Therefore all X are Furries.

Because i am not a zoophile, nor a plushophile. Im just a toonophile who likes to fantasize that im a cartoon animal.

We act. Some acts harm. Some acts benefit. This is not collectively exhaustive. Some acts do neither.

P1: Furries does nothing harmful to others.
P2: Furries does nothing beneficial to others.
C1: Furries is neutral, for Furries does neither.

Unfortunaly some furries does harm others. Not humans, not plushies, i mean animals. And many consider this weird and immoral. So P1 is broken.

I myself am something of a toonophile, I prefer toony furries to 'normal' porn and such. They're really cute and cuddly, and that's what I like. I'm not into pain and shit like that, really turns me off. I'm also pretty into fursuits too, if it's toony enough and well made I'll go ape over it :3. Has to be male stuff though.

If someone wants to look at anime furry art I don't see anything wrong with it, no harm is done to anyone, so it should be no foul.

Bestiality, is a different story. I don't think that an animal can give consent, though as mentioned by another poster, a dog mounting a willing woman pierces the argument on consent. This one is a mixed feelings one for me. I would prefer that people not mess with animals sexually but it's not really any of my business if they're not doing the animal any harm and aren't forcing the animal to do something that he (she) doesn't want to do.

Well, the obvious question to ask is what criteria do you use to determine whether or not something is wrong? Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative works pretty well for this. Could you imagine a society in which people went around 'yiffing' animals, or would this present a problem? Personally, although it would seem like a very strange society, I don't necessarily see what would be problematic about it.

That said, there clearly are things that could constitute animal abuse. Technically, I don't think animals can legally consent, since they can't exactly say yes or no, but as long as you're not hurting the animal or otherwise forcing it to do something it probably couldn't be considered abuse.

I'm certain that the majority of the people who are into zoophilia would never want to hurt the animals they're having sex with. That would be like those abusive relationships between two people. Someone's getting hurt, and that's where the problem starts.

Me, I'm not into that. I find it bizarre, and strangely fascinating, but not really something I'd want to do.

What annoys me, and I bet I've said it before, is the way people act as if all furries are disgustingly sick. I for example, think Jessica Rabbit is hot. But when I'm in bed with my partner, she's the last thing on my mind.

And lolicon. Which I'm not into, but it's just pictures. They seem to get a lot less flack than furries. As does Guro. It's obviously cleaner to be aroused by small children, or girls having their limbs hacked off, than it is to fancy anthromorphic cartoon characters who were clearly designed to be attractive.

You can't look at Jessica Rabbit and deny that she isn't supposed to be attractive (look at those huge boobs!), although whether you're actually hot for her or not is a matter of choice.
_________________
In Dog We Trust

Strafio · Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:29 pm Post subject:

Turn it around on them!
They're the ones with something wrong with their brains! Smile

_________________
Let's all google bomb scientology!!!

Pikachu · Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:33 pm Post subject:

These videos make fun of furries.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZBODjS19Ac
_________________
In Dog We Trust

Specus_Meretricis · Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 12:04 am Post subject:

I can see why they have to wear giant animal suits to get some ass. *Shiver*

physik · Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 5:37 am Post subject:

Pikachu · Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:39 pm Post subject:

Specus_Meretricis · Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:52 pm Post subject:

	AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> General Discussion	All times are GMT - 5 Hours Goto page 1, 2 Next
Page 1 of 2