The Infidel Guy Show
The Debate Hour Show

Faith and Freethought
3 Podcasts, One Feed

or visit this page.


FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    MemberlistMemberlist    UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister   
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 VideoRoom and ChatLive Video and Chat Room   The Infidel Guy's Video RoomFreethought Videos
BlogsBlogs    My BlogWeblogs News


Embed Our Player

~ TIP JAR ~


Free Will and sundry
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> Christianity
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mr_C
Reckoner


Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 6615
Local time: 9:43 PM
Location: Pale Blue Dot
us.gif

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:44 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Romans120 wrote:

I want to deal with your above post more throughly but I only have a couple minutes so I get to that one later. There is one fundamental thing wrong with this statement. Repentance is not a feeling. To Repent means to "turn or change your direction" Repentance does not mean you feel badly for being a theif. It means you stop stealing. So even though God is in control of the man. The man is the object that who's direction was changed


In Biblical Hebrew, the idea of repentance is represented by two verbs: שוב shuv (to return) and נחם nicham (to feel sorrow).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Philosophos
Do it


Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9289
Local time: 12:43 AM
Location: Where Scum Are

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:13 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Mr_C wrote:

Why should God's Elect feel sorry, much less repentant, for something over which they had (and still have) no control?

Again, playing the Calvinist role, there's no "should" in the matter. We have no free will.

Perhaps you're asking how we can tell the elect from the non-elect? In that case, I can dig up some quotes which you probably already know.

Quote:
Remember that repentance is the key to salvation, but I'm arguing that there is no rational basis for repentance other than a puppeteer pulling the "repent" string of its puppet.

Wow. Absolutely not. Repentance is in no way the key to salvation. We are saved through God's grace. Period.

Quote:
And the terms "obey" and "disobey" don't imply choice either? Not within Calvinism, obviously, but generally?

Well, in that case, I don't know what to say. Do you want me to play the Calvinist? If so, then you're wrong, and you admitted it. If not, I don't have any personal beliefs about salvation to defend, and so I can't answer your question.
_________________
The whores and politicians will shout 'save us'...

...and I'll whisper 'no'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr_C
Reckoner


Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 6615
Local time: 9:43 PM
Location: Pale Blue Dot
us.gif

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:22 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Philosophos wrote:
Mr_C wrote:

Why should God's Elect feel sorry, much less repentant, for something over which they had (and still have) no control?

Again, playing the Calvinist role, there's no "should" in the matter. We have no free will.

Perhaps you're asking how we can tell the elect from the non-elect? In that case, I can dig up some quotes which you probably already know.

Maybe if I state it this way:

My little rant was to observe that, according to Calvinistic Theology, nobody would or should repent or even feel bad about sinning since they had no free will to begin with. Even if they realized that sinning was "wrong", they shouldn't feel bad about it because they're just God's puppet anyway. The only reason that they do repent is because God pulls just the right string and the puppet repents. Make sense? I think we actually agree with each other...

Philosophos wrote:

Mr_C wrote:
Remember that repentance is the key to salvation, but I'm arguing that there is no rational basis for repentance other than a puppeteer pulling the "repent" string of its puppet.

Wow. Absolutely not. Repentance is in no way the key to salvation. We are saved through God's grace. Period.

Luke 13:3, bitch. Wink
When God saves someone, they repent.

Philosophos wrote:

Mr_C wrote:
Another conundrum with the theology is the phrase "slave to sin". The word "sin" implies that man has some sort of choice. However, as I've demonstrated above, man doesn't according to Calvinistic Theology. As a result of this, Calvinists may safely eliminate the word "sin" and any derivitive thereof from their vocabulary. It would make more sense if they called themselves "Puppet that will burn in Hell for all eternity (Not Saved)" or "Puppet that won't burn in Hell for all eternity (Saved)"

Philosophos wrote:

[In reply to the bolded text above] Absolutely not. It simply means that a man disobeyed God.

Mr_C wrote:
And the terms "obey" and "disobey" don't imply choice either? Not within Calvinism, obviously, but generally?

Well, in that case, I don't know what to say. Do you want me to play the Calvinist? If so, then you're wrong, and you admitted it. If not, I don't have any personal beliefs about salvation to defend, and so I can't answer your question.

If you re-read the "Another conundrum..." paragraph, you'll see why I called it a conundrum Very Happy I'm arguing that Calvinistic Theology renders the word "sin" into an absolutely meaningless term; one that is both unnecessary and logically impossible within the context of the theology.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
romans120
Resident Theist


Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 2051
Local time: 10:43 PM
Location: The God Shaped Hole in Your Heart
um.gif

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:39 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Mr_C wrote:
Romans120 wrote:

I want to deal with your above post more throughly but I only have a couple minutes so I get to that one later. There is one fundamental thing wrong with this statement. Repentance is not a feeling. To Repent means to "turn or change your direction" Repentance does not mean you feel badly for being a theif. It means you stop stealing. So even though God is in control of the man. The man is the object that who's direction was changed


In Biblical Hebrew, the idea of repentance is represented by two verbs: שוב shuv (to return) and נחם nicham (to feel sorrow).


Well if you going to bring languages into it

4853 metanoe,w
• metanoe,w fut. metanoh,sw; 1 aor. meteno,hsa (evmeteno,hsan w. double augment ApcEsdr 2:24) (s. next entry; Antiphon+)

1. change one’s mind Hv 3, 7, 3; m 11:4 (cp. Diod. S. 15, 47, 3 meteno,hsen o` dh/moj; 17, 5, 1; Epict. 2, 22, 35; Appian, Hann. 35 §151, Mithrid. 58 §238; Stob., Ecl. II 113, 5ff W.; PSI 495, 9 [258 BC]; Jos., Vi. 110; 262), then

2. feel remorse, repent, be converted (in a variety of relationships and in connection w. varied responsibilities, moral, political, social or religious: X., Hell. 1, 7, 19 ouv metanoh,santej u[steron eu`rh,sete sfa/j auvtou.j h`marthko,taj ta. me,gista evj qeou,j te kai. u`ma/j auvtou,j= instead of realizing too late that you have grossly sinned against the gods; Plut., Vi. Camill. 143 [29, 3], Galba 1055 [6, 4], also Mor. 74c; M. Ant. 8, 2 and 53; Ps.-Lucian, De Salt. 84 metanoh/sai evfV oi-j evpoi,hsen; Herm. Wr. 1, 28; OGI 751, 9 [II BC] qewrw/n ou=n u`ma/j metanenohko,taj te evpi. toi/j prohmarthme,noij; SIG 1268, 2, 8 [III BC] a`martw.n metano,ei; PSI 495, 9 [258/257 BC]; BGU 747 I, 11; 1024 IV, 25; PTebt 424, 5; {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ISA.46:8')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Is 46:8;}}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_JER.8:6')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Jer 8:6;}}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_SIR.17:24')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Sir 17:24; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_SIR.48:15')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 48:15; }}}\cf1\ulnone oft. Test12 Patr [s. index]; Philo [s. meta,noia]; Jos., Bell. 5, 415, Ant. 7, 153; 320; Just.) in (religio-)ethical sense evn sa,kkw| kai. spodw/| m. repent in sackcloth and ashes {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAT.11:21')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 11:21; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.10:13')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 10:13. }}}\cf1\ulnone As a prerequisite for experiencing the Reign of God in the preaching of John the Baptist and Jesus {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAT.3:2')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 3:2; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAT.4:17')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 4:17; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAR.1:15')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mk 1:15. }}}\cf1\ulnone As the subject of the disciples’ proclamation {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAR.6:12')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 6:12; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.17:30')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Ac 17:30; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.26:20')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 26:20. }}}\cf1\ulnone Failure to repent leads to destruction {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.13:3')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 13:3, }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.13:5')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 5; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAT.11:20')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 11:20 }}}\cf1\ulnone (h' … metanoh,swsin h' evpimei,nantej dikai,wj kriqw/si Hippol., Ref. 1, pref. 2). Repentance saves (cp. Philo, Spec. Leg. 1, 239 o` metanow/n sw,|zetai; 253; Just., D. 141, 2 eva.n metanoh,swsi, pa,ntej … tucei/n tou/ para. tou/ qeou/ evle,ouj du,nantai) {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAT.12:41')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 12:41; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.11:32')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 11:32; }}}\cf1\ulnone cp. {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.15:7')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 15:7, }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.15:10')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 10; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.16:30')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 16:30. }}}\cf1\ulnone m. eivj to. kh,rugma, tinoj repent at or because of someone’s proclamation {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAT.12:41')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 12:41; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.11:32')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 11:32 }}}\cf1\ulnone (B-D-F §207, 1; Rob. 593; s. eivj 10a). W. evpi, tini to denote the reason repent of, because of someth. (Chariton 3, 3, 11; Ps.-Lucian, Salt. 84; M. Ant. 8, 2; 10; 53; {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_JOE.2:13')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Jo 2:13;}}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_JON.3:10')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Jon 3:10; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_JON.4:2')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 4:2; }}}\cf1\ulnone Am {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_AMO.7:3')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 7:3, }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_AMO.7:6')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 6; }}}\cf1\ulnone Prayer of Manasseh [=Odes 12] 7; TestJud 15:4; Philo, Virt. 180; Jos., Ant. 7, 264; Just., D. 95, 3.—B-D-F §235, 2) evpi. th/| avkaqarsi,a| of their immorality {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_2CO.12:21')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 2 Cor 12:21. }}}\cf1\ulnone evpi. toi/j a`marth,masin of their sins 1 Cl 7:7 (Just., D. 141, 2; cp. OGI 751, 9f). evpi, w. subst. inf. foll. MPol 7:3 (Just., D. 123, 6). Also dia, ti Hv 3, 7, 2. Since in m. the negative impulse of turning away is dominant, it is also used w. avpo, tinojÇ repent and turn away from someth. avpo. th/j kaki,aj ({\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_JER.8:6')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Jer 8:6; }}}\cf1\ulnone Just., D. 109, 1) {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.8:22')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Ac 8:22 }}}\cf1\ulnone (MWilcox, The Semitisms of Ac, ’65, 102-105). avpo. th/j avnomi,aj 1 Cl 8:3 (quot. of unknown orig.). Also e;k tinoj {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.2:21')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Rv 2:21b, }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.2:22')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 22; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.9:20')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 9:20f; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.16:11')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 16:11. }}}\cf1\ulnone W. evpistre,fein evpi. to.n qeo,n {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.26:20')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Ac 26:20. }}}\cf1\ulnone m. eivj e`no,thta qeou/ turn in repentance to the unity of God (which precludes all disunity) IPhld 8:1b; cp. ISm 9:1. But m. eivj to. pa,qoj repent of the way they think about the suffering (of Christ, which the Docetists deny) 5:3. W. inf. foll. {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.16:9')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Rv 16:9. }}}\cf1\ulnone W. o[ti foll. repent because or that (Jos., Ant. 2, 315) Hm 10, 2, 3. W. adv. avdista,ktwj s 8, 10, 3. bradu,teron s 8, 7, 3; 8, 8, 3b. puknw/j m 11:4. tacu, Hs 8, 7, 5; 8, 8, 3a; 5b; 8, 10, 1; 9, 19, 2; 9, 21, 4; 9, 23, 2c. m. evx o[lhj $th/j% kardi,aj repent w. the whole heart 2 Cl 8:2; 17:1; 19:1; Hv 1, 3, 2; 2, 2, 4; 3, 13, 4b; 4, 2, 5; m 5, 1, 7; 12, 6, 1; s 7:4; 8, 11, 3. m. evx eivlikrinou/j kardi,aj repent w. a sincere heart 2 Cl 9:8.—The word is found further, and used abs. (Diod. S. 13, 53, 3; Epict., En 34; Oenomaus [time of Hadrian] in Eus., PE 5, 19, 1 metanoei/te as directive; Philo, Mos. 2, 167 al.; Jos., Ant. 2, 322; Just., D. 12, 2; Theoph. Ant. 3, 24 [p. 254, 17]; eiv h;kousan metanoh,santej, ouvk evph,geto o` kataklusmo,j Did., Gen. 186, 9; a`martwlo.j … pro.j to/ metanoei/n poreuo,menoj Orig., C. Cels 3, 64, 5) {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.17:3')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 17:3f; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.2:38')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Ac 2:38; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.3:19')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 3:19; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.2:5')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Rv 2:5a }}}\cf1\ulnone (Vi. Aesopi G 85 P. metano,hson=take counsel with yourself), vs. {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.2:5')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 5b, }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.2:16')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 16, }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.2:21')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 21; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.3:3')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 3:3, }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_REV.3:19')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 19; }}}\cf1\ulnone 2 Cl 8:1, 2, 3; 13:1; 15:1; 16:1; IPhld 3:2; 8:1a; ISm 4:1; Hv 1, 1, 9; 3, 3, 2; 3, 5, 5; 3, 7, 6; 3, 13, 4a; 5:7; m 4, 1, 5; 7ff; 4, 2, 2; 4, 3, 6; 9:6; 10, 2, 4; 12, 3, 3; s 4:4; 6, 1, 3f; 6, 3, 6; 6, 5, 7; 7:2; 4f; 8, 6, 1ff; 8, 7, 2f; 8, 8, 2; 5a; 8, 9, 2; 4; 8, 11, 1f; 9, 14, 1f; 9, 20, 4; 9, 22, 3f; 9, 23, 2; 5; 9, 26, 6; 8; D 10:6; 15:3; PtK 3 p. 15, 11; 27.—S. also MPol 9:2; 11:1f, in the sense regret having become a Christian; AcPl Ha 1, 17.—Windisch, Exc. on 2 Cor 7:10 p. 233f; Norden, Agn. Th. 134ff; FShipham, ET 46, ’35, 277-80; EDietrich, D. Umkehr (Bekehrg. u. Busse) im AT u. im Judent. b. bes. Berücksichtigg. der ntl. Zeit ’36; HPohlmann, D. Metanoia ’38; OMichel, EvTh 5, ’38, 403-14; BPoschmann, Paenitentia secunda ’40, 1-205 (NT and Apost. Fathers).—On the distinctive character of NT usage s. Thompson 28f, s.v. metame,lomai, end.—B. 1123. DELG s.v. no,oj. M-M. TW. Spicq.

4854 meta,noia
• meta,noia, aj, h` (metanoe,w) prim. ‘a change of mind’ (Thu. 3, 36, 4; Polyb. 4, 66, 7; Appian, Mithrid. 16 §57; pap [s. New Docs 4, 160; Spicq II 475, 17]; TestSol 12:3 C; JosAs, ApcSed; ApcMos 32; Jos., C. Ap. 1, 274, Ant. 16, 125; Just., Tat.), also w. the nuance of ‘remorse’ (as regret for shortcomings and errors: Batr. 69; Lycon the Peripatetic [III BC], fgm. 23 Wehrli [in Diog. L. 5, 66]; Polyb. 18, 33, 7; Stoic. III 147, ln. 21f; Cebes 10, 4; 11, 1; Plut., Mor. 56a; 68f; 961d, Alex. 11, 4, Mar. 10, 4; 39, 3; Chariton 1, 3, 7; Appian, Liby. 52 §225; 102 §482; 116 §553; M. Ant. 8, 10; Ps.-Lucian, Calumn. 5; Jos., Ant. 13, 314. Of the ‘remorse’ of Sophia Iren. 1, 3, 1 [Harv. I 24, 7]); in our lit. w. focus on the need of change in view of responsibility to deity (cp. Hierocles 14, 451; {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_SIR.44:16')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Sir 44:16; }}}\cf1\ulnone Wsd {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_WIS.12:10')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 12:10, }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_WIS.12:19')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 19; }}}\cf1\ulnone Prayer of Manasseh [=Odes 12] 8; Philo, Det. Pot. Ins. 96, Spec. Leg. 1, 58, Virt. 175ff [peri. metanoi,aj] al.; EpArist 188; Jos., Ant. 9, 176; TestReub 2:1; TestJud 19:2; TestGad 5:7f; JosAs 15:6ff; 16:7; ApcSed prol.: peri. avga,phj kai. peri. m.; 14:3 evn metanoi,aij; SibOr 1, 129; 168; Iren. 1, 21, 2 [Harv. 182, 7]; Orig., C. Cels. 7, 57, 3f; Did., Gen. 97, 15) repentance, turning about, conversion; as a turning away meta,noia avpo. nekrw/n e;rgwn turning away from dead works {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_HEB.6:1')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Hb 6:1. }}}\cf1\ulnone Mostly of the positive side of repentance, as the beginning of a new relationship with God: h` eivj qeo.u m. repentance that leads to God {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.20:21')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Ac 20:21. }}}\cf1\ulnone a;xia th/j metanoi,aj e;rga deeds that are consistent with repentance {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.26:20')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 26:20. }}}\cf1\ulnone Also karpo.n a;xion th/j m. {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAT.3:8')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 3:8; }}}\cf1\ulnone cp. {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.3:8')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 3:8. }}}\cf1\ulnone bapti,zein eivj m. baptize for repentance {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAT.3:11')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 3:11 }}}\cf1\ulnone (s. bapti,zw 2a; also eivj 10a). ba,ptisma metanoi,aj {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAR.1:4')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mk 1:4; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.3:3')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 3:3; }}}\cf1\ulnone cp. {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.13:24')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Ac 13:24; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.19:4')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 19:4 }}}\cf1\ulnone (alt. loutrou/ … th/j m. Just., D. 14, 1) crei,an e;cein metanoi,aj need repentance or conversion {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.15:7')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 15:7. }}}\cf1\ulnone khru,ssein m. eivj a;fesin a`martiw/n preach repentance that leads to the forgiveness of sins {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.24:47')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 24:47 }}}\cf1\ulnone (meta,noian kai. a;fesin a`martiw/n dia. … loutrou/ palliggenesi,aj Theoph. Ant. 2, 16 [p. 140. 8f]); cp. 1 Cl 7:6. e;cein kairo.n metanoi,aj still have time for repentance 2 Cl 8:2. to,pon metanoi,aj dido,nai give an opportunity for repentance ({\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_WIS.12:10')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Wsd 12:10; }}}\cf1\ulnone cp. i[na meta,noia doqh/| Did., Gen. 169, 4; avformh.n metanoi,aj kai. evxomologh,sewj para,scein Theoph. Ant. 2, 29 [p. 170, 17]) 1 Cl 7:5. metanoi,aj to,pon eu`ri,skein {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_HEB.12:17')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Hb 12:17 }}}\cf1\ulnone (cp. metanoi,aj to,pon e;cein Tat. 15:3). dido,nai tini. $th.n% m. (cp. {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_WIS.12:19')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Wsd 12:19; }}}\cf1\ulnone M. J. Brutus, Ep. 7) {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.5:31')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Ac 5:31; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ACT.11:18')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 11:18; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_2TI.2:25')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 2 Ti 2:25; }}}\cf1\ulnone B 16:9; cp. Hv 4, 1, 3; s 8, 6, 2; 8, 11, 1. tiqe,nai tini. meta,noian prescribe repentance for someone Hm 4, 3, 4; cp. 5; kalei/n tina eivj m. {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_LUK.5:32')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Lk 5:32 }}}\cf1\ulnone (ApcSed 15:2; Just., A I, 15, 7; 90, 7); {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAT.9:13')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mt 9:13 v.l.; }}}\cf1\ulnone {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_MAR.2:17')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Mk 2:17 v.l. }}}\cf1\ulnone (cp. kalou/ntai auvtou.j evpi. m. kai. dio,rqwsin th/j yuch/j auvtw/n Orig., C. Cels. 3, 62, 3). peri. metanoi,aj lalei/n 1 Cl 8:1. avkou,santej tau,thn th.n meta,noian when they heard of this repentance Hs 8, 10, 3; paideu,esqai eivj m. be disciplined so as to repent 1 Cl 57:1. eivj m. a;gein tina, (EpArist 188; Jos., Ant. 4, 144; cp. Appian, Bell. Civ. 2, 63 §262 qeou/ sfa/j evpi. meta,noian a;gontoj) {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_ROM.2:4')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Ro 2:4; }}}\cf1\ulnone avnakaini,zein eivj m. {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_HEB.6:6')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul Hb 6:6; }}}\cf1\ulnone cwrh/sai eivj m. come to repentance {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_2PE.3:9')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 2 Pt 3:9. }}}\cf1\ulnone meta,noian lamba,nein receive repentance (after denying Christ) Hs 9, 26, 6a. metanoi,aj metascei/n 1 Cl 8:5. meta,noian e;cein have a possibility of repentance Hm 4, 3, 3; s 8, 8, 2. evsti, tini meta,noian have a possibility of repentance Hv 2, 2, 5c; 3, 7, 5; s 8, 8, 5; 8, 9, 4a; 9, 19, 1; 9, 20, 4. tini. meta,noia, evsti mi,a have (only) one possibility of repentance m 4, 1, 8; cp. 4, 3, 1. m. kei/tai, tini repentance is ready, available for someone s 9, 19, 2f; 9, 22, 4; 9, 26, 6b. evpi,keitai, tini 8, 7, 2a. gi,netai, tini 9, 26, 5; eivj ma,thn evsti.n h` m. is in vain 6, 1, 3. tacinh. ovfei,lei ei=nai must follow quickly 8, 9, 4b. h` m. su,nesi,j evstin mega,lh is great understanding m 4, 2, 2. m. kaqara, 12, 3, 2; cp. s 7:6. m. a`marti,aj rep. for sin 2 Cl 16:4; cp. Hm 4, 3, 3. m. zwh/j rep. that leads to life s 6, 2, 3; cp. 8, 6, 6. evlpi.j metanoi,aj hope of repentance or conversion IEph 10:1; Hs 6, 2, 4; 8, 7, 2b; 8, 10, 2. W. pi,stij and other Christian virtues 1 Cl 62:2. The a;ggeloj th/j m. appears in Hermas as a proclaimer of repentance: v 5:7; m 12, 4, 7; 12, 6, 1; s 9, 1, 1; 9, 14, 3; 9, 23, 5; 9, 24, 4; lupei/sqai eivj m. feel pain that leads to repentance {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_2CO.7:9')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 2 Cor 7:9, }}}\cf1\ulnone lu,ph meta,noian evrga,zetai (cp. Plut., Mor. 476f) vs. {\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "BwRef('BGT_2CO.7:10')"}}{\fldrslt{\cf0\ul 10.}}}\cf1\ulnone —W. the Christian use of the word in mind Polycarp says avmeta,qetoj h`mi/n h` avpo. tw/n kreitto,nwn evpi. ta. cei,rw meta,noia for us ‘repentance’ from the better to the worse is impossible MPol 11:1.—WHolladay, The Root Sûbh in the OT, ’58.—TRE VII 446-51; RAC II 105-18.—DELG s.v. no,oj. M-M. EDNT. TW. Spicq. Sv.

C/O BDAG

The only important part is the Primary use of both these greek words for the concept of repenting is "a change of mind" I'll admit there is a secondary use that does carry a sense of feeling. But I think the context of Biblical texts will reflect the primary use

BTW philosophos is arguing my perspective very well.
_________________
For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. Romans 1:19-20

Check out my weblog at http://romans120.wordpress.com/


Last edited by romans120 on Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:40 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
da_monumental_1
Linux Gawd


Joined: 27 Mar 2003
Posts: 692
Local time: 12:43 AM
Location: Lumberton, NC
us.gif

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:39 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Oops. Too much data.
_________________
Send Your Kids To Camp Okutta

Evan Tanner
32-8-0
2/11/71 – 9/8/08





Origin of Quaid - NSFW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Philosophos
Do it


Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9289
Local time: 12:43 AM
Location: Where Scum Are

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:01 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Mr_C wrote:
Maybe if I state it this way:

My little rant was to observe that, according to Calvinistic Theology, nobody would or should repent or even feel bad about sinning since they had no free will to begin with.

I'm still sticking with your normative stance... your "should". Any person who is just a puppet can't do otherwise. And my point is that there's no point in telling someone they "should" do anything differently when they can't.

Philosophos wrote:

Mr_C wrote:
Remember that repentance is the key to salvation, but I'm arguing that there is no rational basis for repentance other than a puppeteer pulling the "repent" string of its puppet.

Wow. Absolutely not. Repentance is in no way the key to salvation. We are saved through God's grace. Period.


Quote:
Luke 13:3, bitch. Wink
When God saves someone, they repent.

Can I just ignore that?

While I feel Calvinism gives Catholicism a run for its money in terms of intellectual tradition, I can't say that it's any more "Bible-believing" than any other Christian stance for exactly such reasons.

Mr_C wrote:
If you re-read the "Another conundrum..." paragraph, you'll see why I called it a conundrum Very Happy I'm arguing that Calvinistic Theology renders the word "sin" into an absolutely meaningless term; one that is both unnecessary and logically impossible within the context of the theology.

I still don't actually see this.
_________________
The whores and politicians will shout 'save us'...

...and I'll whisper 'no'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr_C
Reckoner


Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 6615
Local time: 9:43 PM
Location: Pale Blue Dot
us.gif

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:50 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Philosophos wrote:
Mr_C wrote:
Maybe if I state it this way:

My little rant was to observe that, according to Calvinistic Theology, nobody would or should repent or even feel bad about sinning since they had no free will to begin with.

I'm still sticking with your normative stance... your "should". Any person who is just a puppet can't do otherwise. And my point is that there's no point in telling someone they "should" do anything differently when they can't.

Ok, point taken. People either do or do not repent, but only because they are God's puppets. Better?

Philosophos wrote:

Philosophos wrote:

Mr_C wrote:
Remember that repentance is the key to salvation, but I'm arguing that there is no rational basis for repentance other than a puppeteer pulling the "repent" string of its puppet.

Wow. Absolutely not. Repentance is in no way the key to salvation. We are saved through God's grace. Period.


Quote:
Luke 13:3, bitch. Wink
When God saves someone, they repent.

Can I just ignore that?

While I feel Calvinism gives Catholicism a run for its money in terms of intellectual tradition, I can't say that it's any more "Bible-believing" than any other Christian stance for exactly such reasons.

Calvinists believe in repentance because of that verse and others I'm sure, that one's just the most obvious.


Philosophos wrote:

Mr_C wrote:
If you re-read the "Another conundrum..." paragraph, you'll see why I called it a conundrum Very Happy I'm arguing that Calvinistic Theology renders the word "sin" into an absolutely meaningless term; one that is both unnecessary and logically impossible within the context of the theology.

I still don't actually see this.


* If sinning is disobeying God
* And if disobeying God is a choice
* And if having a choice implies free will
* Then Man has free will and isn't God's puppet after all.

Furthermore, how could a puppet disobey God? He's only doing what God is making it do! If it's God pulling the strings, how is the puppet guilty of anything? IOW, How can a puppet sin?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
josephpalazzo
Illusion Master


Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 8036
Local time: 11:43 PM
Location: D-brane

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:55 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Mr_C wrote:
Philosophos wrote:
Mr_C wrote:
Maybe if I state it this way:

My little rant was to observe that, according to Calvinistic Theology, nobody would or should repent or even feel bad about sinning since they had no free will to begin with.

I'm still sticking with your normative stance... your "should". Any person who is just a puppet can't do otherwise. And my point is that there's no point in telling someone they "should" do anything differently when they can't.

Ok, point taken. People either do or do not repent, but only because they are God's puppets. Better?

Philosophos wrote:

Philosophos wrote:

Mr_C wrote:
Remember that repentance is the key to salvation, but I'm arguing that there is no rational basis for repentance other than a puppeteer pulling the "repent" string of its puppet.

Wow. Absolutely not. Repentance is in no way the key to salvation. We are saved through God's grace. Period.


Quote:
Luke 13:3, bitch. Wink
When God saves someone, they repent.

Can I just ignore that?

While I feel Calvinism gives Catholicism a run for its money in terms of intellectual tradition, I can't say that it's any more "Bible-believing" than any other Christian stance for exactly such reasons.

Calvinists believe in repentance because of that verse and others I'm sure, that one's just the most obvious.


Philosophos wrote:

Mr_C wrote:
If you re-read the "Another conundrum..." paragraph, you'll see why I called it a conundrum Very Happy I'm arguing that Calvinistic Theology renders the word "sin" into an absolutely meaningless term; one that is both unnecessary and logically impossible within the context of the theology.

I still don't actually see this.


* If sinning is disobeying God
* And if disobeying God is a choice
* And if having a choice implies free will
* Then Man has free will and isn't God's puppet after all.

Furthermore, how could a puppet disobey God? He's only doing what God is making it do! If it's God pulling the strings, how is the puppet guilty of anything? IOW, How can a puppet sin?


Hah, Mr C, you are one of the few who understands logic...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog
Philosophos
Do it


Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9289
Local time: 12:43 AM
Location: Where Scum Are

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:01 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Mr_C wrote:
Ok, point taken. People either do or do not repent, but only because they are God's puppets. Better?

Sure. Rhetorically charged, but fine.

Mr_C wrote:
Calvinists believe in repentance because of that verse and others I'm sure, that one's just the most obvious.

But do they believe that repentance must be a sign of a true believer, or that repentance must be done in order to be saved? Surely it's the former case. There is absolutely nothing that a person can do from his own will in order to be saved for a Calvinist.

(And, in full disclosure, I was not raised a Calvinist, but a mixed Catholic/Eastern Orthodox guy, so I'm much less into Calvinist theology than I should be. I got pulled into Calvinist philosophy, however, because it is the best modern philosophy of religion out there)

Mr_C wrote:
* If sinning is disobeying God
* And if disobeying God is a choice
* And if having a choice implies free will
* Then Man has free will and isn't God's puppet after all.

Ugh. We need to work on your logic.

If (A AND B AND C) Then (D AND not-E)

That doesn't quite work. At least not as a proof.

Quote:
Furthermore, how could a puppet disobey God? He's only doing what God is making it do! If it's God pulling the strings, how is the puppet guilty of anything? IOW, How can a puppet sin?

Quite easily. If I say "kicking me in the shins is wrong!", and then I pull a puppet's strings to kick me in the shins, then, by definition, it's doing wrong.
_________________
The whores and politicians will shout 'save us'...

...and I'll whisper 'no'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Philosophos
Do it


Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9289
Local time: 12:43 AM
Location: Where Scum Are

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:02 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

josephpalazzo wrote:
Hah, Mr C, you are one of the few who understands logic...

Lulz. Dueling logicians.

Duh duh duh duh duh duh...
_________________
The whores and politicians will shout 'save us'...

...and I'll whisper 'no'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stickhorse
Antichrist


Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 870
Local time: 12:43 AM
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:12 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

phil wrote:
Quite easily. If I say "kicking me in the shins is wrong!", and then I pull a puppet's strings to kick me in the shins, then, by definition, it's doing wrong.


aah, but in actuality it is you who is doing wrong, not the puppet. the puppet is simply obeying your command.

(iow)

you kicked yourself in the shins with the puppet.
_________________

http://myspace.com/stickhorse
you'll never believe what i got baddogma to do for a klondike bar!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Philosophos
Do it


Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9289
Local time: 12:43 AM
Location: Where Scum Are

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:21 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

stickhorse wrote:
aah, but in actuality it is you who is doing wrong, not the puppet. the puppet is simply obeying your command.

Dude: fuck you.

I really see no good way around this, so I must concede.

There must be actual Calvinists (or at least former Calvinists) who can do better than I can at this stuff.
_________________
The whores and politicians will shout 'save us'...

...and I'll whisper 'no'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stickhorse
Antichrist


Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 870
Local time: 12:43 AM
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:23 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Philosophos wrote:
stickhorse wrote:
aah, but in actuality it is you who is doing wrong, not the puppet. the puppet is simply obeying your command.

Dude: fuck you.

I really see no good way around this, so I must concede.

There must be actual Calvinists (or at least former Calvinists) who can do better than I can at this stuff.


you're welcome. Very Happy
_________________

http://myspace.com/stickhorse
you'll never believe what i got baddogma to do for a klondike bar!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
romans120
Resident Theist


Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 2051
Local time: 10:43 PM
Location: The God Shaped Hole in Your Heart
um.gif

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:32 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

[quote="Mr_C"]
Quote:

* If sinning is disobeying God
* And if disobeying God is a choice
* And if having a choice implies free will
* Then Man has free will and isn't God's puppet after all.


lets modify your definition of "sin" to "falling short of the mark" The mark is perfection or Holiness

also the puppet analogy while I understand it, it is imperfect. It has the same problems as the robot analogy in that puppets as well as robots are not aware of the actions they are preforming.

one other key element of calvinism must be accounted for in you analogy. You are missing a step. The unregenerate puppeteer is sin (slave to sin) the regenerate puppeteer is God (slave to God) Sin is not outside of God's control it is merely permitted. God is passively or permissively the puppeteer of the unregenerate
_________________
For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. Romans 1:19-20

Check out my weblog at http://romans120.wordpress.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Philosophos
Do it


Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 9289
Local time: 12:43 AM
Location: Where Scum Are

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:36 pm    Post subject: Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

Thank you for your compliment, Romans. As I said, I was not raised in a Calvinist tradition, but I do respect it. I especially respect the modern Calvinist philosphers, who really give us a run for our money. I will try to pick up the Calvinist defense when I see an opportunity.

For now, I feel defeated, and I'm going to take it all out on that dumb hick HBA... fuckin' guy... livin' in the South... hate him...
_________________
The whores and politicians will shout 'save us'...

...and I'll whisper 'no'.


Last edited by Philosophos on Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:39 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AtheistForums.com Forum Index -> Christianity All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 3 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Internet advertising - Credit Cards - Loans - Books - Mortgages
phpBB SEO