| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Philosophos Do it

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 9289 Local time: 9:15 AM Location: Where Scum Are
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For fuck's sake... _________________ The whores and politicians will shout 'save us'...
...and I'll whisper 'no'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 8:15 AM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | So ShaSha, as loopy as you both are, is a breath of fresh air next to me. I guess you really cannot stand rationality. Are you allergic to it? |
I'm waiting for a demonstration of your "rational political ideas". Show me the way, O Great Master... |
I already did. Somehow, when you quoted an earlier post of mine, you failed to include some text that I included. Yet there's no edit stamp on my post, which leads me to conclude that you didn't accurately quote me. |
So you're all game to dish out insults, but when called upon to elaborate on your "rational political ideas", you give out lame excuses not to do so... you are a total joke and an intellectual fraud... |
Are you really unable to look up and see which post of mine you didn't fully quote? It's not a lame answer to say "I already did it" when I already did it.
Fraud is to misquote someone ... hmm ...
Perhaps, again, you are saying "I know you're a fraud because it takes one to know one". That being the case, I think you are mistaken about whether or not I am in your category. |
So I will have to conclude that Jason_Harvestdancer's rational political ideas = "I don't know what I'm talking about, but I will pretend that I do by repeating ad nauseam 'I already did it' line".
Yep, that will get you far in life... |
If that's the best you can do ... well it will have to do but I feel pity for you. |
Jason_Harvestdancer's rational political ideas = "I don't know what I'm talking about, but I will pretend that I do by repeating ad nauseam 'I already did it' line". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason_Harvestdancer WonderMod Powers ACTIVATE!

Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 2406 Local time: 5:15 AM Location: Northern LA County, CA
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
And now you're covering your inadequacy by lying. _________________ Nos laetus edo qui votum opprimo nobis.
LakeGeorgeMan actually think's I'm Socrates.
Visit my wife's art gallery |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason_Harvestdancer WonderMod Powers ACTIVATE!

Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 2406 Local time: 5:15 AM Location: Northern LA County, CA
|
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cheapsuprise wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: |
It's much safer to conclude that you really are just as irrational as ShaSha. |
ShaSha probably understands the axiom of identity though, or at least knows better than to go out on a limb if she doesn't.
JOE, on the other hand, fucked it up three times in a row, while he was "challenging" me on my knowledge of logic.
being irrational is one thing. Being ironically incompetent is another-- much funnier thing. |
The problem is, he is forgetting that while atheists do consider atheism more rational than theism, that doesn't mean that ALL atheists are ALWAYS more rational than everyone else in ALL situations and topics. That he is getting owned by a theist clearly offends him.
He sees religious threads where the burden of proof is on the theist to prove God, so he assumes that the burden of proof is always on the theist. What he doesn't udnerstand is that the burden of proof is always on the claimant, whether the topic be religious, political, or scientific. He assumes since he's an atheist and I'm a theist then when he makes the positive claim "me thinks that you are part of a conspiracy of spreading stupidity wherever, whenever" and "your IQ is below par, so my politics are beyond your mental reach" the burden of proof is somehow on me. For those who lost track, those are the positive claim that started this whole back-and-forth between JP and myself. Yet since he's an atheist and I'm a theist the burden of proof is mystically transferred to me.
It's a supernatural belief. _________________ Nos laetus edo qui votum opprimo nobis.
LakeGeorgeMan actually think's I'm Socrates.
Visit my wife's art gallery |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 8:15 AM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cheapsuprise wrote: |
ShaSha probably understands the axiom of identity though, or at least knows better than to go out on a limb if she doesn't.
JOE, on the other hand, fucked it up three times in a row, while he was "challenging" me on my knowledge of logic.
being irrational is one thing. Being ironically incompetent is another-- much funnier thing. |
Now that's a laugh when I gave you TWO assignments on another thread, a one-year university level course in logic , which you systematically avoided...
Here's a refresher for your pissed-poor memory
ASSIGNMENT 1: http://www.atheistforums.com/libertarian-socialism-t6503-240.html
ASSIGNMENT 2: http://www.atheistforums.com/libertarian-socialism-t6503-345.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 8:15 AM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | So ShaSha, as loopy as you both are, is a breath of fresh air next to me. I guess you really cannot stand rationality. Are you allergic to it? |
I'm waiting for a demonstration of your "rational political ideas". Show me the way, O Great Master... |
I already did. Somehow, when you quoted an earlier post of mine, you failed to include some text that I included. Yet there's no edit stamp on my post, which leads me to conclude that you didn't accurately quote me. |
So you're all game to dish out insults, but when called upon to elaborate on your "rational political ideas", you give out lame excuses not to do so... you are a total joke and an intellectual fraud... |
Are you really unable to look up and see which post of mine you didn't fully quote? It's not a lame answer to say "I already did it" when I already did it.
Fraud is to misquote someone ... hmm ...
Perhaps, again, you are saying "I know you're a fraud because it takes one to know one". That being the case, I think you are mistaken about whether or not I am in your category. |
So I will have to conclude that Jason_Harvestdancer's rational political ideas = "I don't know what I'm talking about, but I will pretend that I do by repeating ad nauseam 'I already did it' line".
Yep, that will get you far in life... |
If that's the best you can do ... well it will have to do but I feel pity for you. |
Jason_Harvestdancer's rational political ideas = "I don't know what I'm talking about, but I will pretend that I do by repeating ad nauseam 'I already did it' line". |
| Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | And now you're covering your inadequacy by lying. |
Post your fucking "rational" political ideas for debate. Put up or shut the fuck up... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason_Harvestdancer WonderMod Powers ACTIVATE!

Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 2406 Local time: 5:15 AM Location: Northern LA County, CA
|
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And you will pretend you didn't see it again? _________________ Nos laetus edo qui votum opprimo nobis.
LakeGeorgeMan actually think's I'm Socrates.
Visit my wife's art gallery |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cheapsuprise disgraced, in exile.

Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 7220 Local time: 5:15 AM Location: Next door.
|
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| josephpalazzo wrote: | | cheapsuprise wrote: |
ShaSha probably understands the axiom of identity though, or at least knows better than to go out on a limb if she doesn't.
JOE, on the other hand, fucked it up three times in a row, while he was "challenging" me on my knowledge of logic.
being irrational is one thing. Being ironically incompetent is another-- much funnier thing. |
Now that's a laugh when I gave you TWO assignments on another thread, a one-year university level course in logic , which you systematically avoided... |
LOL, but why should I do your assignments? I never claimed to be a logician. You just decided to make it an issue because you felt butt hurt. Then you felt even more butt hurt after you fucked up over and over. I'm wondering if YOU could have done those "assignments" yourself. I'm still waiting for you to explain to me WHEN Mermaids DON'T have identity. _________________ "-- Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than
feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to
be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it
is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be
dispensed with."-- Niccolò Machiavelli |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason_Harvestdancer WonderMod Powers ACTIVATE!

Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 2406 Local time: 5:15 AM Location: Northern LA County, CA
|
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But he likes having other people do his homework, Cheap. _________________ Nos laetus edo qui votum opprimo nobis.
LakeGeorgeMan actually think's I'm Socrates.
Visit my wife's art gallery |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cheapsuprise disgraced, in exile.

Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 7220 Local time: 5:15 AM Location: Next door.
|
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | But he likes having other people do his homework, Cheap. |
What he doesn't like is getting slapped like a bitch, but slappings come to those who ask for them. _________________ "-- Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than
feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to
be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it
is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be
dispensed with."-- Niccolò Machiavelli |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 8:15 AM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cheapsuprise wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | cheapsuprise wrote: |
ShaSha probably understands the axiom of identity though, or at least knows better than to go out on a limb if she doesn't.
JOE, on the other hand, fucked it up three times in a row, while he was "challenging" me on my knowledge of logic.
being irrational is one thing. Being ironically incompetent is another-- much funnier thing. |
Now that's a laugh when I gave you TWO assignments on another thread, a one-year university level course in logic , which you systematically avoided... |
LOL, but why should I do your assignments?
|
To shut me up, idiot. But you missed that opportunity, and now you are a fucking joke, trying to squirm out of that situation, but those threads are there for anyone to verify. If you want a third assignment, I can give you plenty. Are you ready, after all you've had a few months to hone your skills??? LOL.
Let me know when you're ready, fucking moron...
ASSIGNMENT 1: http://www.atheistforums.com/libertarian-socialism-t6503-240.html
ASSIGNMENT 2: http://www.atheistforums.com/libertarian-socialism-t6503-345.html[/size][/color]
Last edited by josephpalazzo on Sun May 18, 2008 4:25 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 8:15 AM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| josephpalazzo wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | So ShaSha, as loopy as you both are, is a breath of fresh air next to me. I guess you really cannot stand rationality. Are you allergic to it? |
I'm waiting for a demonstration of your "rational political ideas". Show me the way, O Great Master... |
I already did. Somehow, when you quoted an earlier post of mine, you failed to include some text that I included. Yet there's no edit stamp on my post, which leads me to conclude that you didn't accurately quote me. |
So you're all game to dish out insults, but when called upon to elaborate on your "rational political ideas", you give out lame excuses not to do so... you are a total joke and an intellectual fraud... |
Are you really unable to look up and see which post of mine you didn't fully quote? It's not a lame answer to say "I already did it" when I already did it.
Fraud is to misquote someone ... hmm ...
Perhaps, again, you are saying "I know you're a fraud because it takes one to know one". That being the case, I think you are mistaken about whether or not I am in your category. |
So I will have to conclude that Jason_Harvestdancer's rational political ideas = "I don't know what I'm talking about, but I will pretend that I do by repeating ad nauseam 'I already did it' line".
Yep, that will get you far in life... |
If that's the best you can do ... well it will have to do but I feel pity for you. |
Jason_Harvestdancer's rational political ideas = "I don't know what I'm talking about, but I will pretend that I do by repeating ad nauseam 'I already did it' line". |
| Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | And now you're covering your inadequacy by lying. |
Post your fucking "rational" political ideas for debate. Put up or shut the fuck up... |
| Jason_Harvestdancer wrote: | | And you will pretend you didn't see it again? |
I don't pretend anything. You are under the misguided notion that people all over should know about your political ideas, as if you are the navel of the world, and people are attentive to every word you write. Get a reality check, nobody gives a fuck about your political ideas, and if you want people to know about them, it's your fucking responsibilities to communicate them. If you don't want to, fine, but don't go around preaching as if I should know them. You are so fucked up that the title "No even wrong" applies to you...
So again:
Post your fucking "rational" political ideas for debate. Put up or shut the fuck up... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cheapsuprise disgraced, in exile.

Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 7220 Local time: 5:15 AM Location: Next door.
|
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| josephpalazzo wrote: | | Quote: |
LOL, but why should I do your assignments?
|
To shut me up, idiot. |
I shut you up HERE.
Before that I invited you to back your shit up HERE. Nothing is hidden, it's all in plain view. Your WAY behind me when it comes to answering challenges.
| Quote: | | But you missed that opportunity, and now you are a fucking joke, trying to squirm out of that situation-- |
No, I control the situation. I've had you on the defensive ever since your first fuck-up. I'm gonna continue to hurt your feelings by asking you this question:
When do Mermaids NOT have identity? Lets hear it, Mr. Logician.
Put down the text book that you borrowed and use your brain. _________________ "-- Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than
feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to
be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it
is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be
dispensed with."-- Niccolò Machiavelli |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 8:15 AM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| josephpalazzo wrote: | | cheapsuprise wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | cheapsuprise wrote: |
ShaSha probably understands the axiom of identity though, or at least knows better than to go out on a limb if she doesn't.
JOE, on the other hand, fucked it up three times in a row, while he was "challenging" me on my knowledge of logic.
being irrational is one thing. Being ironically incompetent is another-- much funnier thing. |
Now that's a laugh when I gave you TWO assignments on another thread, a one-year university level course in logic , which you systematically avoided... |
LOL, but why should I do your assignments?
|
To shut me up, idiot. But you missed that opportunity, and now you are a fucking joke, trying to squirm out of that situation, but those threads are there for anyone to verify. If you want a third assignment, I can give you plenty. Are you ready, after all you've had a few months to hone your skills??? LOL.
Let me know when you're ready, fucking moron...
ASSIGNMENT 1: http://www.atheistforums.com/libertarian-socialism-t6503-240.html
ASSIGNMENT 2: http://www.atheistforums.com/libertarian-socialism-t6503-345.html[/size][/color] |
| cheapsuprise wrote: | | josephpalazzo wrote: | | Quote: |
LOL, but why should I do your assignments?
|
To shut me up, idiot. |
I shut you up HERE.
Before that I invited you to back your shit up HERE. Nothing is hidden, it's all in plain view. Your WAY behind me when it comes to answering challenges.
| Quote: | | But you missed that opportunity, and now you are a fucking joke, trying to squirm out of that situation-- |
No, I control the situation. I've had you on the defensive ever since your first fuck-up. I'm gonna continue to hurt your feelings by asking you this question:
When do Mermaids NOT have identity? Lets hear it, Mr. Logician.
Put down the text book that you borrowed and use your brain. |
What a fucking idiot: mermaids are a figment of the imagination. They have identity as much as Santa, the flying spaghetti monster and, oh wait, ... God. Only a fucking moron like you would bring up mermaids in a field such as LOGIC. The first thing about LOGIC you ought to know is to deal with factive statements. Obviously, you can't make that distinction. Stop posting on AF, you are a total embarrassement to all atheists posting here...
Last edited by josephpalazzo on Mon May 19, 2008 8:45 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
romans120 Moderator


Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 1976 Local time: 8:15 AM Location: mid-west
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zocrates wrote: | | cheapsuprise wrote: | | Zocrates wrote: |
| Quote: | | What's pretty about how they sit? |
The way their feet dangle atop their large sums of money, profiting from others' death and misfortune. |
They are already rich though. I find it far fetched that something as ill-conceived as the Iraq war, was a business decision. |
Not saying that it's definitely the case, but what are your reasons for why we're over there? People have been trying to figure out why America's still over there for the past 5 years.....no one has a clue.
I don't think it's ill-conceived at all given the amount of money the war is making for people. |
Perhaps its the obvious reason that the terrorists arn't dead yet. _________________ The Resident Theist
For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. Romans 1:19-20
Check out my weblog at http://romans120.wordpress.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|