| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
munky99999 Provisional moralist.

Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 4671 Local time: 8:25 AM Location: Ontario, Canada

|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:08 am Post subject: Barack Obama on atheism |
|
|
39:45 long. It's a pretty long speech.
Older Keynote
"For one, they need to understand the critical role that the separation of church and state has played in preserving not only our democracy, but the robustness of our religious practice. Folks tend to forget that during our founding, it wasn't the atheists or the civil libertarians who were the most effective champions of the First Amendment. It was the persecuted minorities, it was Baptists like John Leland who didn't want the established churches to impose their views on folks who were getting happy out in the fields and teaching the scripture to slaves. It was the forbearers of the evangelicals who were the most adamant about not mingling government with religious, because they did not want state-sponsored religion hindering their ability to practice their faith as they understood it.
Moreover, given the increasing diversity of America's population, the dangers of sectarianism have never been greater. Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.
And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we go with James Dobson's, or Al Sharpton's? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount - a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let's read our bibles. Folks haven't been reading their bibles.
This brings me to my second point. Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God's will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all."
Fucking eh. _________________ A cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his fleshand drink his blood; while telepathically tell him you accept him as your master so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.
You cant outsmart me; you can only outnumber me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Castaa Forum Master


Joined: 17 Aug 2005 Posts: 2584 Local time: 6:25 AM Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's good to hear this being put forward. This is the foundational argument of the separation of church and state in government by putting a premium on arguments based on reason in the public sphere of discourse.
Gee, I wonder where he gets such crazy ideas?? Oh ya, he teaches constitutional law. Funny how that knowledge could help a Presidency...
However, I highly doubt you see ever see a speech like this given by him while he's running for or holding the office of US President. Granted none of the candidates would either. I would of course like to be proven wrong. _________________ MY YouTube Videos  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gettin' In Tune SUSPENDED - Pending Council Decision

Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 3308 Local time: 8:25 AM
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:54 am Post subject: Re: Barack Obama on atheism |
|
|
| Quote: | | [i]"For one, they need to understand the critical role that the separation of church and state has played in preserving not only our democracy, but the robustness of our religious practice. |
No, it did not. The South was founded on economic reasons. The North was founded on religious fanatics.
| Quote: | | Folks tend to forget that during our founding, it wasn't the atheists or the civil libertarians who were the most effective champions of the First Amendment. |
The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights, and The Constitution was the work of enlightened radicals influence by John Locke; a rational and empirical christian.
| Quote: | | It was the persecuted minorities, it was Baptists like John Leland who didn't want the established churches to impose their views on folks who were getting happy out in the fields and teaching the scripture to slaves. It was the forbearers of the evangelicals who were the most adamant about not mingling government with religious, because they did not want state-sponsored religion hindering their ability to practice their faith as they understood it. |
I wonder why. Because they knew that they were nuts?
| Quote: | | Moreover, given the increasing diversity of America's population, the dangers of sectarianism have never been greater. Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers. |
I disagree. There is no need to reconcile faith with society and science.
| Quote: | | This brings me to my second point. Democracy demands that the religioupsly motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God's will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all." |
This is a perverted version of democracy.
So fucking what? I do not need christ.
p.s. Munkey,
Are you an atheist or a theist? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
munky99999 Provisional moralist.

Joined: 02 Feb 2004 Posts: 4671 Local time: 8:25 AM Location: Ontario, Canada

|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | However, I highly doubt you see ever see a speech like this given by him while he's running for or holding the office of US President. Granted none of the candidates would either. I would of course like to be proven wrong. |
Ya well... the reality is that in a democracy... the president is the best representative of the people. The people in this case dont share this belief. So thusly it would be volunteering this information up... however while it's still primaries... this can come out and get to those... the atheists and other religious minorities... will get the message because of it being good for them... when it comes to actual election... this knowledge is still on the minority's minds...
| Quote: | So fucking what? I do not need christ.
p.s. Munkey,
Are you an atheist or a theist? |
I realize you aren't very bright. You are responding to Obama's keynote speach from a few years ago.
Obama is a christian and thusly isn't based entirely off truth. Infact given his father being an ex-muslim atheist would be HUGE in terms of showing him what atheism really is. He chose christianity... He understands the hatred and oppression that is in the Bible. _________________ A cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his fleshand drink his blood; while telepathically tell him you accept him as your master so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.
You cant outsmart me; you can only outnumber me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RyanDzundza Sock Puppet

Joined: 19 Sep 2007 Posts: 5318 Local time: 1:25 PM Location: Manchester

|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:38 am Post subject: Re: Barack Obama on atheism |
|
|
| Quote: | I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God's will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all."[/i]
|
i think this is a good point and would hope more christians took this view point
i was also expecting him to bash atheists as baby killers or something when i first noticed this thread _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daggett Forum Leader


Joined: 22 Jul 2007 Posts: 553 Local time: 7:25 AM Location: Kansas

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gettin' In Tune SUSPENDED - Pending Council Decision

Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 3308 Local time: 8:25 AM
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| munky99999 wrote: | | I realize you aren't very bright. You are responding to Obama's keynote speach from a few years ago. |
You do not need to keep regurgitating your opinion. I realize that I was responding to Obama's speech and not your words. I never quoted you.
| Quote: | | Obama is a christian and thusly isn't based entirely off truth. Infact given his father being an ex-muslim atheist would be HUGE in terms of showing him what atheism really is. He chose christianity... He understands the hatred and oppression that is in the Bible. |
I have no idea what you are trying to say. Can you answer my question? Are you an atheist or a theist? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 10192 Local time: 9:25 AM Location: Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Obama has to stress his Christian roots in order to offset any Republican attack on his tenuous link to Islam. But on the whole, he seems to be the kind who will take off his religious hat once he's in the oval office. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gettin' In Tune SUSPENDED - Pending Council Decision

Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 3308 Local time: 8:25 AM
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Not allowing religion to guide politics is correct. We should not be grateful for this. I am not sure when religion played such a dominant factor in claiming the presidency. It is a regression. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aitm pronounced as "thaddeus"

Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 3037 Local time: 9:25 AM Location: Space Coast

|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am not aware of any, really, instance where religion played a defining role in a presidency. They may have used religion as a convienant answer/reason/excuse, but most simply use it to get/remain in power.
Only idiots believe a candidate is really religious, unfortunately, idiots seem to have the same rights to vote as the rest. _________________ A word to the wise is unnecessary, a speech to the fool, useless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Castaa Forum Master


Joined: 17 Aug 2005 Posts: 2584 Local time: 6:25 AM Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aitm wrote: | I am not aware of any, really, instance where religion played a defining role in a presidency. They may have used religion as a convienant answer/reason/excuse, but most simply use it to get/remain in power.
Only idiots believe a candidate is really religious, unfortunately, idiots seem to have the same rights to vote as the rest. |
It has been argued that Harry Truman supported Israel (against the near universal decent of his advisers) because he was deeply religious and it was supported by biblical prophesy. I'm not sure of this view is supported by the majority of US historians.
I think truly religious people do let their instincts get filled in with divine influence. I have no doubt Bush felt that the wars were just before God was speaking through him. Not to say however there were other obvious influences. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hit_me_up024 Forum Master


Joined: 25 Dec 2007 Posts: 2407 Local time: 8:25 AM Location: My parents basement.

|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes us atheist are the best we know this. _________________ babygirl say she a lady and important to? Well i got the xray i see the whore in you. haha
Props to Enemy_of_Reality |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redraiderdude187 The Madcap Laugher

Joined: 19 Jan 2007 Posts: 1152 Local time: 8:25 AM Location: Houston, Texas

|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:00 pm Post subject: Re: Barack Obama on atheism |
|
|
| munky99999 wrote: | 39:45 long. It's a pretty long speech.
Older Keynote
"For one, they need to understand the critical role that the separation of church and state has played in preserving not only our democracy, but the robustness of our religious practice. Folks tend to forget that during our founding, it wasn't the atheists or the civil libertarians who were the most effective champions of the First Amendment. It was the persecuted minorities, it was Baptists like John Leland who didn't want the established churches to impose their views on folks who were getting happy out in the fields and teaching the scripture to slaves. It was the forbearers of the evangelicals who were the most adamant about not mingling government with religious, because they did not want state-sponsored religion hindering their ability to practice their faith as they understood it.
Moreover, given the increasing diversity of America's population, the dangers of sectarianism have never been greater. Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.
And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we go with James Dobson's, or Al Sharpton's? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount - a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let's read our bibles. Folks haven't been reading their bibles.
This brings me to my second point. Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God's will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all."
Fucking eh. |
Unless I misread something, I don't really see a problem with this; it's not like I don't like him just because he's a Christian. If he's willing to accept people of all faiths in some sort of Universalistic manner, then I'm fine with that; in fact, I would argue that the Universalistic viewpoint on religion is probably the best position for a politician in a representative government just because everyone deserves to have some sort of input or piece of mind in a decision. _________________ Above the hive, beyond the lynch mob, where two and two always make four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Castaa Forum Master


Joined: 17 Aug 2005 Posts: 2584 Local time: 6:25 AM Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PZ's point is that making appeals to religion is crazy and unjustified. Let's not forget that. It doesn't matter that he's the best of a bad field for free thinking voters. Granted, I think Clinton has made the least references to religion of entire field of candidates this year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PJS Forum Master Po

Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Posts: 1231 Local time: 8:25 AM Location: Clearwater,Fl.
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| josephpalazzo wrote: | | Obama has to stress his Christian roots in order to offset any Republican attack on his tenuous link to Islam. But on the whole, he seems to be the kind who will take off his religious hat once he's in the oval office. |
Sadly, the less sincere the candidate in his religious statements , the better. The scariest candidates are the ones who truly believe the mumbo-jumbo. It's somewhat of a guessing game to discern who if any are the true believers, , but in the least Obama seems unlikely to incorporate any religious faith he may have in any policies. _________________ The path of least resistance and least trouble is a mental rut already made. It requires troublesome work to undertake the alternation of old beliefs.
-John Dewey |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|